In the past, there are a couple proof Kennedy set owners who have sniped the set award. If they're planning that this year, though, they're out of luck. Not possible to topple Edson - he owns the top spot for all time to come.
I wouldn't be too worried about the #2 set, it's the "The number 1 set of all time (future)" set you have to be worried about. He's probably waiting till the end of June to list his other 79 dates.
Better hope it's not registered in another set could take a few days to get the # freed-up
"My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
Russ, The only guy that can snipe me is EBL III but looks like he is tired of collecting Kennedy.
The others that had the habit of hiding the composition of the set to throw everything in the last hours, they will have to work better this year if they want to tie with me.
The good news is that I have a real chance to make a second 1969 PR70DCAM. I found one PR69DCAM ++++PQ.
Wow, thanks for the heads up, guys. I had been planning to hold my newest update to my Walker short set until the end of June. But then I read this thread. I said to myself, "My gosh, what I was planning to do has a name, 'sniping.' I certainly dont want to be known as a sniper." So, shamed as I was to even contemplate such a dastardly deed, I decided to post my upgrade today, a 1947-D in 67, pop 7/0. I'm computer illiterate, so if anyone wants to provide a link to "impalasteve's walker short set," that would be fine. If not, thats ok also.
Steve
PS. Of course we all realize that the TRUE #1 short set belongs to Walkerguy, who recently retired his awesome set, which allowed a perennial #2 guy like me move up.
Bill , You must have known that your set was going to be topped. I just looked at your set today and you are now #2. I think you can get back your top racking but you will need to upgrade. I am now #3 well we will see how it all plays out. Fred
In NASCAR, you get points for leading a lap that goes towards the championship. Should the registry winners be based on average time standing versus point in time standing?
Collector of Modern Silver Proofs 1950-1964 -- PCGS Registry as Elite Cameo
" In NASCAR, you get points for leading a lap that goes towards the championship. Should the registry winners be based on average time standing versus point in time standing?"
No, unless PCGS starts a championship. These are only individual races.
"It's far easier to fight for principles, than to live up to them." Adlai Stevenson
I may not have made my point. One way to lower the impact of sniping would be to use an average time basis. This would promote adding coins as obtained.
Dave
Collector of Modern Silver Proofs 1950-1964 -- PCGS Registry as Elite Cameo
Pcgs does give the nod to the earliest list set in a tie but I fell the # 1 listed set on the closing day should win. as highlander said " there can only one ".
I like Dave’s idea with the averaging.. Or another way (which I think is better) is to limit the percentage of number of coins in the last month upgrades and additions. For example, in a 20 coin set, only 2 coins will count if more added within the last 30 days. This would give the honest competitors (as Hutton and Lyle in the 2000 set) ability to battle to the deadline, and prevent the obvious disrespect for the registry that was shown by Lothlórien....ric
I would have to agree........What happened tonite sucked. I work (as well as Ernie - Lyle) hard on this set and to be slammed loke this when JUST LAST NIGHT that set was at #8 and closed....is BS. With 10000 sets registered, there has to be some paramiters set. That is clearly uncalled for. Just my 2 half cents worth.
I would have to agree........What happened tonite sucked. I work (as well as Ernie - Lyle) hard on this set and to be slammed loke this when JUST LAST NIGHT that set was at #8 and closed....is BS. With 10000 sets registered, there has to be some paramiters set. That is clearly uncalled for. Just my 2 half cents worth. >>
Guys, Take it easy..Your day will come.....you know what they say about payback....Now get going and give me some competition on my early Mint Sets.......33-47.....Nobody has even put up another 33 set! I just received 4 coins for my Mint Sets, but rather then snipe I will just hold off and put them up this weekend. Trust me, it's not that big a deal...........have fun......build the best set you can and challange the others to beat it..........and if they do......congrads to them.......
Building 33-47 Mint Sets always looking for MS67s PM with any coins you might have for sale.
Comments
As always I'm in the dark.
09/07/2006
<< <i>How many of you have upgrades and are waiting for 11:59 June 30th 2004 to post them? >>
If there are any, I think you get replies from them at 11:59 June 30th 2004. So they don't tip their hand.
be enjoying having some competition.
Russ, NCNE
I wouldn't be too worried about the #2 set, it's the "The number 1 set of all time (future)" set you have to be worried about. He's probably waiting till the end of June to list his other 79 dates.
The only guy that can snipe me is EBL III but looks like he is tired of collecting Kennedy.
The others that had the habit of hiding the composition of the set to throw everything in the last hours, they will have to work better this year if they want to tie with me.
The good news is that I have a real chance to make a second 1969 PR70DCAM. I found one PR69DCAM ++++PQ.
Let’s see if PCGS agree with me.
Edson
09/07/2006
Steve
PS. Of course we all realize that the TRUE #1 short set belongs to Walkerguy, who recently retired his awesome set, which allowed a perennial #2 guy like me move up.
The set is entered now.
Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
Steve
WOW!! Tremendous set(s), lots of great coins.
MS Buffalo
MS 1951
I hope....Text
Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
No, unless PCGS starts a championship. These are only individual races.
I may not have made my point. One way to lower the impact of sniping would be to use an average time basis. This would promote adding coins as obtained.
Dave
Link to 1950 - 1964 Proof Registry Set
1938 - 1964 Proof Jeffersons w/ Varieties
I just want people to have to make their coins visible for
everyone to see.
as highlander said " there can only one ".
David
My 20th Century Gold Major Design Type Set ---started : 11/17/1997 ---- completed : 1/21/2004
I would have to agree........What happened tonite sucked. I work (as well as Ernie - Lyle) hard on this set and to be slammed loke this when JUST LAST NIGHT that set was at #8 and closed....is BS. With 10000 sets registered, there has to be some paramiters set. That is clearly uncalled for. Just my 2 half cents worth.
<< <i>Currin
I would have to agree........What happened tonite sucked. I work (as well as Ernie - Lyle) hard on this set and to be slammed loke this when JUST LAST NIGHT that set was at #8 and closed....is BS. With 10000 sets registered, there has to be some paramiters set. That is clearly uncalled for. Just my 2 half cents worth. >>
Guys,
Take it easy..Your day will come.....you know what they say about payback....Now get going and give me some competition on my early Mint Sets.......33-47.....Nobody has even put up another 33 set!
I just received 4 coins for my Mint Sets, but rather then snipe I will just hold off and put them up this weekend.
Trust me, it's not that big a deal...........have fun......build the best set you can and challange the others to beat it..........and if they do......congrads to them.......
Mike
idocoins
Camelot