Guess the Grade 1985-D Kennedy Half.....

Proof69Eagles · June 29, 2004 9:30AM

Guess the grade on this beauty!!!!...... will reveal grade later tonight

Looks well deserving to me!!!

kamehameha00 · June 29, 2004 9:34AM

Pictures a little dark but...MS-65?

Russ · June 29, 2004 9:34AM

I'd grade it MS65 (weak strike), but it's probably in an MS66 holder.

Russ, NCNE

fcloud · June 29, 2004 9:38AM

67

Proof69Eagles · June 29, 2004 10:19AM

I'll agree with Russ, that the strike on the obverse could be better, looks like Kennedy has a Mohawk in the photo, but this coin is nick free on both sides, with strong luster.

TheNumish · June 29, 2004 10:20AM

MS-67

tgilliams · June 29, 2004 10:37AM

MS66

19Lyds · June 29, 2004 11:48AM

The fields all look very clear but I see some slight nicks on the reverse shield and the fingerprint on the obverse.

I'll go MS64.

Option1 · June 29, 2004 11:51AM

65
Looks alittle flat in the pic.

Proof69Eagles · June 29, 2004 11:54AM

I know its hard to tell from a picture, but the marks(small scratches) by the shield and the fingerprint are on the slab.

19Lyds · June 29, 2004 12:46PM

In that case I'll bump to a MS-66. Possible a MS-67

Manorcourtman · June 29, 2004 9:13PM

I have to believe because of the weak obverse strike it would go 65 at best. I do not see any crease in his neck and he almost looks bald on the side of his head. The shield also appears to have hits as well as a decent hit on Liberty. The fields, however, seem very PQ. If it is 67 I'll have to scratch my head on this one. I have numerous 70's and 80's Kennedys exactly like this one in 65 holders. OK....what's the grade?? We assume it's in a PCGS holder........PCI MS68 maybe??

TUMUSS · June 29, 2004 10:09PM

65

Manorcourtman · June 30, 2004 7:49AM

Ok.....what's the grade?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????And who slabbed it?????????

Proof69Eagles · June 30, 2004 7:55AM

I had to mess with you all some............

It is graded NTC MS69

But it is a nick free coin, the obverse strike is weak, I would give it a 66/67 just for no nicks and great luster though.

airplanenut · June 30, 2004 7:56AM

NTC MS69

clackamas · June 30, 2004 8:00AM

The shield has way too many marks for anything above 65 IMO. Its a main focal point and should be fairly clean to garner 66.

nwcs · June 30, 2004 9:06AM

65/66

poorguy · June 30, 2004 9:20AM

If that coin is in an MS69 holder, NTC should increase their scale to a modified-Sheldon 80 scale.

The very ugly hits on the sheild and the overall extremely weak strike should keep this coin from going anything over 64 in any holder offered by a respectable grading service. MS69 is just plain pathetic.

airplanenut · June 30, 2004 9:31AM

<< <i>MS69 is just plain pathetic. >>

I didn't say I agree. I just think it is an NTC holder, and I guessed their grade.

Russ · June 30, 2004 9:36AM

<< <i>The very ugly hits on the sheild and the overall extremely weak strike should keep this coin from going anything over 64 in any holder offered by a respectable grading service. >>

If the coin has full luster, it would easily grade MS65 at PCGS. If the luster is eye popping, it might very well grade MS66. The shield hits are actually very minimal for this issue, the fields are excellent, and the portrait is nearly mark free. As for the strike, these are normally weakly struck on the obverse.

Russ, NCNE

Proof69Eagles · June 30, 2004 9:44AM

Just to let you all know, in case you missed my post above,

Airplanenut is right....... It is in an NTC MS69 holder,

However, there are no nicks on the shield, what you see in the picture are scratches on the slab and the fingerprint is on the slab,

I have looked at the coin with a 10x and 30x loupe and it is a nick free coin. The strike is weak on the obverse I will say, but I still think the luster and lack of hits on it, make it at least a MS66. That is my opinion although that doesn't count for squat!!!

Manorcourtman · June 30, 2004 10:02AM

Luster will not get you from 65 to 66 at PCGS on MS Kennedys without a strong strike. MS Kennedys are very cut and dry between 65-68, technical grading is not a matter of luster.....it is a matter of strike and # of hits. MS69NTC, MS68PCI as I called it...what's the difference. NTC will get you 3 points, PCI will get you 2 points......very pathetic nonetheless. Good thread, thanks. Don't waste your $$ by sending it to PCGS....it will grade 64.

Russ · June 30, 2004 10:13AM

<< <i>Luster will not get you from 65 to 66 at PCGS on MS Kennedys without a strong strike. >>

Of course it will. With PCGS, blazing luster will overcome a lot of flaws.

<< <i>MS Kennedys are very cut and dry between 65-68, technical grading is not a matter of luster.....it is a matter of strike and # of hits. >>

If PCGS actually graded strictly on a technical basis, there's no way in hell this coin would have graded MS66:

Strike and number of hits are only one part of the grade and, at PCGS, are not necessarily the most important elements in many series.

Russ, NCNE

Proof69Eagles · June 30, 2004 10:38AM

I am going to send this coin to PCGS in a couple days along with some others. When it comes back, I will post the results. I believe Russ is correct in that nicks are not the primary grading aspects in a coin. It is apparent from seeing other coins in holders, that are beautifully toned, obtain higher grades than other coins of similar aspects. I truly believe that this coin will come back in a 66 holder from PCGS.

Thanks to all who contributed to this thread.

Guess the Grade 1985-D Kennedy Half.....

Comments

Leave a Comment