Someone said there are 75/25 9s out there? I thought they were talking about 8s. That's just silly. There are no 9s that are even 65/35 that I've ever seen
<< <i>I made the comment the other day regarding 75/25 PSA 9's, after someone said we had all seen them. I asked for a pic, but have not seen one yet. >>
In my opinion I'd rather have a well centered 8 in my 61 Topps set than a poorly centered 9 any day!
I don't have exact measurements but I've seen plenty of 9's that I wouldn't have in my set because of poor centering. Worse than most of the 8's I see out there for some reason.
Buckwheat, I have one. I PSA 9 that I estimated at 78/22. It is otherwise clean and I paid less for it than SMR for an 8 at the time. I have thought of re-submitting and taking the insurance but then I would have to buy another "9". It is on my list to replace albeit at a low prioirity. My scanner is still in the box and I do not have a few hours to work it all out at this point but if you will send me an email address, I will be glad to make you a photocopy and mail it. OH GOD, How low tech. Fuzz
Wanted: Bell Brands FB and BB, Chiefs regionals especially those ugly milk cards, Coke caps, Topps and Fleer inserts and test issues from the 60's. 1981 FB Rack pack w/ Jan Stenerud on top.
Wanted: Bell Brands FB and BB, Chiefs regionals especially those ugly milk cards, Coke caps, Topps and Fleer inserts and test issues from the 60's. 1981 FB Rack pack w/ Jan Stenerud on top.
Comments
However, I have to admit that the Feller card is might off center for an 8.
<< <i>I made the comment the other day regarding 75/25 PSA 9's, after someone said we had all seen them. I asked for a pic, but have not seen one yet. >>
Here's a 1954 Banks Rookie PSA-9 which is OC 80/20 top to bottom.
Robert
Any high grade OPC Jim Palmer
High grade Redskins (pre 1980)
I don't have exact measurements but I've seen plenty of 9's that I wouldn't have in my set because of poor centering. Worse than most of the 8's I see out there for some reason.
Anyone else observe this?
Tom
I have one. I PSA 9 that I estimated at 78/22. It is otherwise clean and I paid less for it than SMR for an 8 at the time. I have thought of re-submitting and taking the insurance but then I would have to buy another "9". It is on my list to replace albeit at a low prioirity. My scanner is still in the box and I do not have a few hours to work it all out at this point but if you will send me an email address, I will be glad to make you a photocopy and mail it. OH GOD, How low tech.
Fuzz
On the other hand, I measured as best I could from scan, and I get 62/38 L/R and 68/32 T/B, both within "legal limits" for an 8.
PSA 9's 75/25
Shane