Home U.S. Coin Forum

Cleaned coin ?

Am trying to train my eye on numerous aspects of numismatics,and my unexpert opinion tells me that
this coin was cleaned.
The tone looks unnatural and maufactured.
Agree / Dis agree ?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2211771403
JJ

Comments

  • JohnZJohnZ Posts: 1,732
    Link-O-Matic

    The photo certainly makes it appear to be cleaned. The color is a little bit unnatural.

    We ARE watching you.

    image
  • VeepVeep Posts: 1,454 ✭✭✭✭
    Looks unnatural to me too. It could be due to a number of reasons includig having been tampered with or just plain poor photography. This is not a rare coin. There are sure to be more that come along that do look natural and take away that risk.
    "Let me tell ya Bud, you can buy junk anytime!"
  • 1040taxman1040taxman Posts: 153 ✭✭✭
    JJ69: The fact that it's not certified by a reputable grading could be reason enough to stay away from it.I'm not comfortable with the color.
  • Thanks for the replies.
    It does look un natural,plus there appears to be a fair amount of little scratches on the reverse.
    In fact,I tried dipping an unsalvagable common date wheat a couple weeks ago in:
    pickle juice
    acetone,then
    jewel luster -
    And the resulting color looks to be about the same as that one,minus the scratches.
    I'm not only trying to train my eyes,but also have a roll of these not so rare but more collectable
    than average coins,so I'm trying to gauge the market for them,which seems to be from $2 to
    $6 or so for a F/VF ungraded brown,if ebay can be any guide.
    I will most likely sell 40 of them and keep 10 or so.
    JJ
  • Its NOT cleaned. The planchlets in those days were not the best!!!,....Ken
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    I think so and I think you could get a better deal.
  • JamericonJamericon Posts: 440 ✭✭✭
    I do not think that it is cleaned. I have seen a few coins of that year which have that color- it was common for those planchets during that time. In fact, the coin looks RD. Any abberations could be a poor picture.
    Jamie Yakes - U.S. paper money collector, researcher, and author. | Join the SPMCUS Small-Size Notes, National Bank Notes, and NJ Depression Scrip
  • nankrautnankraut Posts: 4,565 ✭✭✭
    IMHO, there's no way a 94 yr old copper coin could have a color like this unless it has been "messed with"
    I'm the Proud recipient of a genuine "you suck" award dated 1/24/05. I was accepted into the "Circle of Trust" on 3/9/09.
  • My first impression is that the photographer did a bit too much "correcting" of the photo.

    Next is the gouge and other scratches

  • merz2merz2 Posts: 2,474
    I'd be willing to bet the pic was messed with rather than the coin itself.I think if you had it in hand,it would look a whole lot different.The Luster is there.That isn't a bad price either.
    Don
    Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns


  • << <i>I'd be willing to bet the pic was messed with rather than the coin itself.I think if you had it in hand,it would look a whole lot different.The Luster is there.That isn't a bad price either. >>



    I asked the seller himself,and he simply stated that the 'coin is uncirculated'.
    I'm almost willing to give him the benifit of doubt - Especially since I'm not looking to purchase it,but I'll
    have to stick to my original conclusion that that coin is the victim of a botched cleaning job.
    If he did digitally recolorize it,I'd say he did a pretty poor job.
    I would suspect that when most people alter a pic to make a coin look better for an auction,they increase
    the saturation to make faded colors/luster look fuller - Not completely change its color.
    It looks neither red nor brown or anywhere in between,more like a wholly un natural orangish gold.

    But I agree that with the coin in hand,one could possibly come to a different conclusion.
    JJ
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    Still, you can get a lot better coin for the money. Even a PCGS 65RD, which will cost a bit more, will be much nicer and protected from most potential problems. If you go raw, you should be able to cherry pick a 64 or 65 for around $10 at a show.
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The fact that it's not certified by a reputable grading could be reason enough to stay away from it. >>



    In many cases, that would be true. Not so with this one, though. It's a cheap coin in or out of a slab so, unless it's an ubergrade, there's no real incentive to submit it.

    Russ, NCNE
  • JRoccoJRocco Posts: 14,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I agree with Russ. I would not slab that coin.
    Some coins are just plain "Interesting"

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file