Would this be considered attractive toning?

The coin appears to be nearly gold plated. You can see a small part around the "T" in liberty that looks like a finger print where someone held the coin. The same "finger" mark is on the other side as well as the gold tone. It is currently in a PCGS MS65 holder...
What could cause such toning?
What could cause such toning?
0
Comments
<< <i>Would this be considered attractive toning? >>
OH YES!!
Michael
I kind of agree with you. All though I'm biased because it's my coin; it just looks strange. It looks a lot like those gold plated ones that you can purchase. But, we all know that PCGS would never slab one. It certainly is different...
<< <i>I wouldn't want a whole set of Ikes that looked like this one >>
I don't know - I'm working on a gold set of silver Kennedy's - I think it looks kinda neat
In Laurel
MD
Just a fist full of Dollars
<< <i>I don't know - I'm working on a gold set of silver Kennedy's - I think it looks kinda neat >>
<< <i> I'm working on a gold set of silver Kennedy's >>
Frank, way to nice...love that 68, third down from the top.
mcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu">dmcinnes@mailclerk.ecok.edu
Here are my Canadian dollars which I've shown you before.
For me great toning has visual appeal any which way you look at it. The golden toned dollar on the top left has this and looks great all the time.
The blue toned one is better looking in more direct like which highlights the blue of course. The toning on the bottom left tooks cool but only in direct light, preferably daylight, otherwise it looks muddy.
Of course I don't have much experience with toned US coins but that may change soon.
<< <i>Unfortunately the ones that I have seen have had a lot of hairlines due to the naked coin being exposed to the velvet case as well. >>
The blue toned one unfortunately has this problem which is a bummer. The golden one is pretty clean though.