Options
"64" doesn't mean cleaned. "64 cleaned" means cleaned. Do you agree?
I borrowed the title from a reply in another thread. When I read it, it made me think. 
I personally have always kept "GRADE" and "problems" separate. I like that ANACS grades problem coins but have never liked their net-grading. The coin is "x" grade with "x" problem. Nuff said, no need for net-grade as now you are trying to price the coin and the buyer and seller decide that.
A coin can be 64 or any other grade AND have problems. Any thoughts?
Joe.
I personally have always kept "GRADE" and "problems" separate. I like that ANACS grades problem coins but have never liked their net-grading. The coin is "x" grade with "x" problem. Nuff said, no need for net-grade as now you are trying to price the coin and the buyer and seller decide that.
A coin can be 64 or any other grade AND have problems. Any thoughts?
Joe.
0
Comments
Just my eversohumble opinion.
Cheers,
Bob
Not to start a never-ending battle but by the above definition I would include dipping as evidence that it was in circulation but I know there are many who would disagree.
Joe.
Live Long and Prospect.
Personally, I see them as impaired and "NO-GRADE". Please, this is not a shot at TD or chopmarked coin collectors, just my opinion. I'm asking this because I see chopmarked TD's on eBay all the time where the seller is claiming them as UNC. I don't recall ever seeing one in a holder graded as UNC.
Cheers,
Bob
<< <i>I personally have always kept "GRADE" and "problems" separate. >>
Joe I am not sure how you can do this. Problems equate directly to what a coin grades. Sure a coin can have no wear and have Mint State details strike wise but if the luster is impaired, cleaned, the coin is not mint state any longer. JMHO.
On the Trade Dollar. Its damaged. The coin is a part of numismatic history but still damaged. Again JMHO.
Ken
<< <i>"64" doesn't mean cleaned >>
I would definitely agree with this premise!
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Not to open up a can of worms, but...What do you consider a chopmarked TD that is otherwise MS... >>
I would say that they're definitely damaged or impaired. But chopmark collectors area different breed and a numismatic subculture, so I say they can call them whatever they want, lest they should try to chopmark me!
If the coin has been cleaned it still has value, it just should be net graded, as ANACS does. There's alot of wiped coins in the world that are worth owning.
IMHO
Michael
Unless the cleaning, tooling or holing (if that's a word
Check out some of my 1794 Large Cents on www.coingallery.org
<< <i>64" doesn't mean cleaned. "64 cleaned" means cleaned. Do you agree? >>
defintiely not, what's the paranoia w/ cleaned coins? happens all the time.
"64" simply means it is a bit better than "choice" but not quite a gem, & says nada about "cleaning". MANY cleaned coins are VERY, VERY choice. if you are so all uptight about it, chances are you should choose an easier hobby, like collecting marbles.
literally thousands upon thousands of ms-65, ms-66, 67 & up have been "cleaned" by dipping them. your focusing on the wrong thing, whether it's cleaned or not, you should focus on whether or not you LIKE the coin as it is.
K S
Ken
Jeremy
Darktone:
I wouldn't mind seeing the coin first before attempting to determine if it is a 64. There are some slight hairlines but those hairlines may not be due to a cleaning.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.