I say NT. I don't consider it particulary attractive (sorry), but most of the tone doctors aim for bright colors or rainbows. I've not seen a whole lot of AT coins toned in an album type pattern in grey or black.
Well, it doesn't look entirely natural to me, and do not think it even makes "intentional but market acceptable" meaning that the P or the N would slab it. It's too white in the center and too dark around the rims, and the transition is too sharp and kind of uneven. Maybe something was brushed on or off the coin. Sorry, maybe it looks better in hand than in the pics.
I also lean towards artificially applied. The edges are too sharp and at weird angles. The way the color jumps the rim also worries me. My first impression when seeing the coin was "yikes." Sorry. It is always possible that the pic is horrible or was enhanced to show the color. That would explain why the center is blown way out of gamut.
i kinda am leaning toward the AT side, bc of the dark rims and pristine centers......and relatively same obv and rev......hope i am wrong for your sake, please post pics when you get her.
tom
Family, kids, coins, sports (playing not watching), jet skiing, wakeboarding, Big Air....no one ever got hurt in the air....its the sudden stop that hurts. I hate Hurricane Sandy. I hate FEMA and i hate the blasted insurance companies.
No, I don't think it's naturally toned. The patina has the appearance of being derived from an album, hence the "target" effect. However, when a coin tones like this, without actually being in contact with the source of the toning (and, in most cases, even when there is contact), the colors do not start out that dark, but rather get darker with additional exposure time. As this process proceeds, and it takes quite a while for the outer portion of the coin to tone that dark natually, the inner portion will begin to assume some of the earlier colors that the rim took on.
On your piece, Doug, there is no such effect. One would expect to see some blue toning being formed inside the dark outer portion, rather than the bright white surface that appears untoned. To me, that implies that the outer toning was applied in a rapid and unnatural manner. For this reason, I suspect the coin is AT, and further believe that its appearance is not market acceptable for the top tier grading services, and I don't mean just PCGS or NGC.
I have a Morgan1$ with toning like that in a PCGS holder. I think it is NT, but that is the type of toning that sometimes is called enviromental damage by the grading services. It all depends on how deep it is into the coin.imo
Comments
David
Doug
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
peacockcoins
I think its a nice natural toning
My posts viewed
since 8/1/6
tom
<< <i>The Teacher asking the students if it's AT or not... >>
On your piece, Doug, there is no such effect. One would expect to see some blue toning being formed inside the dark outer portion, rather than the bright white surface that appears untoned. To me, that implies that the outer toning was applied in a rapid and unnatural manner. For this reason, I suspect the coin is AT, and further believe that its appearance is not market acceptable for the top tier grading services, and I don't mean just PCGS or NGC.
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain
Newmismatist
Free Trial
Michael (Frattlaw) - your refund just went down to 100%...
Doug