Just Miss Designation Coins....Pricing Discussion.

The series I collect is Merc Dimes. A Full Band coin can bring some very high money for certain dates. Frankly the money some of these dates bring in FB is way way out of my league. The problem that is encountered is what to pay for one of these dates if it has a very nice strike but just not quite there in reguard to the bands. Would you think a person should only pay Gray Sheet prices for these just miss coins or should the person pay maybe 50% over Gray Sheet ? Is there another formula that would work ?
Some examples would be a 18D a 19S and the 45P. A 18D graded MS65 is a $650 coin but in MS65FB it is a coin worth upto $30,000 or more. The 19S is a $1350 coin in MS66 but there is No Value stated by PCGS for MS66FB because one has not been certified by them. The 45P in MS66 is a $60 coin but add the FB to the slab and you have a $20,000 coin. These examples would suggest to me that one of these dates if found with 90% bands should sell for much more than straight MS grade but much less than the complete FB coin.
Your thoughts about Merc Dimes or any other series that has a strike designation, price wise for the just miss coins.
Ken
Some examples would be a 18D a 19S and the 45P. A 18D graded MS65 is a $650 coin but in MS65FB it is a coin worth upto $30,000 or more. The 19S is a $1350 coin in MS66 but there is No Value stated by PCGS for MS66FB because one has not been certified by them. The 45P in MS66 is a $60 coin but add the FB to the slab and you have a $20,000 coin. These examples would suggest to me that one of these dates if found with 90% bands should sell for much more than straight MS grade but much less than the complete FB coin.
Your thoughts about Merc Dimes or any other series that has a strike designation, price wise for the just miss coins.
Ken
0
Comments
What you say makes perfect sense and I practice it all the time. Since we share a passion for the same series, you know the kind of adrenaline we feel when we see a 1945 dime that is 2/3 or more FB, but not 2/3 the price of the full FB.
In otherwords, if you can cherrypick a 80% FB 1945 dime and pay straight price for it or a slight premium, thats fine as long as it meets your collecting parameters. I collect duplicate Mercs, so its never a question of settling for a single 45 with 50% FB or a single 1939S that has to have 100% FSB, etc.
I simply love exceptional Mercs and don't mind having multiples with varying attributes.
Enjoy the hobby.
I have seen premiums paid for RB designated copper, that is very close to full red in color. I think FB Merc's are a different story. The bands are either there, or they are not. Same goes with FH on SLQ's. I've seen "80% full head" descriptions in price guides for some SLQ's, but I would think you would have a hard time pushing for extra dough on those.
LSCC#1864
Ebay Stuff
The only series where I think the pricing does take into account more than just the designation is Standing Lib Quarters. Let's see if we can get some collectors of those beauties to chime in... Excellent thread!
Maybe the Grading Services need to put the amount of split on the slab.
Maybe these coins also should be valued like a pristine classic car. First you start out with the MS66 Car and then a premium for a larger engine is attached to the car untill you get to the real Hot Rod version which would be the FB Car
Ken
There is likely more opportunity for cherry picking in the very well struck coins
which miss the designation by either a lot or a little. These are probably an even
better value in the very high grades since they'll go for a fraction of the coins with
the designation in many cases.
Coins with the designation and a nearly full strike may well also be underappreciated
in many cases.
I would pay a small premium for coins like that even though it would be hard to get a premium when selling.
How much would you pay for an MS64 that walked and talked like an MS65 but just missed?
It's scary that I, too, thought of expanding the "near miss" issue to beyond a strike-based designation.
The issue of FMV for a near miss FB gem 1945 Merc is akin to the issue for an 1872S dollar in super-slider ChAU59+++++. For both, the issue is one of condition rarity, For both, the issue involves the FMV decline of a coin after examination of a minute area on the coin.
Let's expand this even further and talk about the 1877 Trade Dollar. In MS64, it is hardly a rarity (relative to the series). Yet, in full GEM, it is a fabulous rarity. One of the Big Two have yet to grade a specimen in GEM! So, what is the FMV of a MS64.9+++++++ specimen that will never be a 65 due to minor weakness of strike?
I find this issue to be an excellent one for discussion, but I think we should examine it inclusive of all types of "near miss" issues and not just involving FB's and the like. Additionally, I think true specialists will not hesitate to pay strong premiums over the average specimen if they feel the coin is otherwise all there. And, I'm not talking about the designation on a holder, as most specialists learn to assess on their own.
EVP
How does one get a hater to stop hating?
I can be reached at evillageprowler@gmail.com
Tony
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
As to worrying about what a dealer will pay: Why? Why not sell it to another collector of Merc Dimes who appreciates the "nearness" of it? With the interenet and message boards such as this it probably wouldn't be too hard to find collectors like Fairlane of WingedLiberty (or jom, in the past) who buy these.
As to trying to the strike designations themselves: IMO, it is best to observe the OVERALL strike. If that strike (regarless of how it's designated) effects the EYE APPEAL then thre is no basis for paying a premium. In fact, it should be bought at a discount, no? So when I see many FH SLQ's with "FH" (even true FH's) that do NOT have full shield I have never understood how one can pay a big premium for that. BUT...if this same piece has some GREAT TONING or wonderful LUSTER it might be worth more. Again, it is the OVERALL EYE APPEAL that should determine the price not necessarily how it's graded. Grade and quality are not necessarily the same thing.
jom
What about 1939-S or 1945 in AU55, or AU58 with full bands? Whould these deserve a price premium?
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
<< <i>Here is some more food for thought.
What about 1939-S or 1945 in AU55, or AU58 with full bands? Whould these deserve a price premium? >>
Excellent question. There is likely lots of room for cherry picking in these
areas also. What about four step Jeffersons? Some of these are very
elusive with a few steps. Surely some collectors will desire steps even if they
are less than full or the coin has some circulation. The steps are a high point
so they will generally be worn before the coin gets in low grade.
Well, that about says it all - doesn't it?!
Charlie
At least for PCGS, a a small hit in the FBL area will not keep a coin from getting an FBL desingation. A larger hit will, as would even a small hit that covers what appears to be an incomplete spot in the lines.
are worth. Everytime a collector spends money for a coin he is voting for what
he finds to be of value. If collectors decide that a designation or some other as-
pect of condition is important then eventually prices will reflect this. What people
value is determined by their beliefs, so what we believe is the determining con-
sideration in the long run. Those who collect for enjoyment and as a diversion
will at least gain this. Those who enjoy their collections will learn what real value
is as part of their education.
Just as in the long run it's the coin that determines value, in the long run it's con-
dition that determines relative value for individual coins and dates. Just missed
coins can certainly represent good conditions and excellent value at today's prices.