I just posted a new thread entitled "Coin Photography 101" for the same reason -- advice. I am experimenting with my new Sony Cyber-shot. It is a pocket-sized still/video 5 megapixel camera. My best advice from another novice: - Use a tripod - Use two lamps with standard 60W bulbs indoors (more consistent) or outdoor lighting - Don't use a flash - Use macro focusing (25 cm focusing distance worked best for me) - Cut down the resolution to 3 megapixels (more than this just creates a larger file size) - Cut down the f/stop a little from the maximum (widest) setting (f/3.5 worked best for me) for less lens distortion - Use a fairly wide angle, but not the widest setting (f=12mm worked best for me) for less lens distortion - Use ISO 100 - Overexpose by 1.0, i.e., set eV to +1.0 - Set white balance to incandescent lighting (indoors) or the appropriate outdoor setting (experiment) - Use center mode autofocusing - Use spot metering mode - When saving the .jpg file, choose true color, progressive mode, and YUV422 subsampling For a sample, see the picture of the 1900-S Morgan silver dollar at my link below. I am still having trouble with getting the file size down to <=100 KB for the registry sets and still keeping a reasonable quality image.
"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5
"For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
Invest in some OTT-lights. You still need to play with light positioning and camera angles for EVERY coin depending on toning, metal type, etc., but the true color will be 95% spot on.
Backgrounds are very important also. A light cream textured background works well with no fussing with the white balance. Also, using a setting of 1600 x 1200 pixels is as much as would be necessary unless you're planning on using a multi-thousands dollar specialized color printer on Kodak papers.
Remember, most people only have equipment to view 72 dpi shots, and unless you have your own webserver for hosting (300 dpi or better possible), you'll lose a lot of original details and crispness by the time you've shrunk the jpeg down to under 50k.
John -- a while back I put together a few pages of boring details for a friend who had just purchased a Nikon 4500. It will put you to sleep but you may find some helpful tips, and save you the 2 years it took me to start taking decent copper images. I'm still learning as I go along and these pages could use an update. And I'm sure some experienced photographers can offer better advice.
Besides my discontinued 995, I also own a Nikon 5700 5.0 megapixel that I haven't been as happy with for macro shots. Something about the lens on that 8X zoom camera that just doesn't capture the color & luster as well. Or maybe I just didn't stick with it long enough. The difference in a 3.0 and 5.0 megapixel camera's picture quality is negligible once you've reduced the images to internet acceptable sizes.
Shylock: Thanks for the warning on that Nikon 5700. If I ever decide to "upgrade" my camera I'll take that into account. But with the result I've had with my "outdated" 950 I don't think I'll be "upgrading" any time soon.
Comments
It's what separates those taking exceptional pictures with $100 cameras from those who take lousy pictures with million-dollar cameras.
Lighting, angle, composition.
I can attest to that!
Of course, macro is also necessary
<< <i>Of course, macro is also necessary >>
but of course.
1.3" on my $100 Ricoh RDC-4300.
siliconvalleycoins.com
<< <i>Is Shylock around? He takes awesome pix. Maybe he has some advice. >>
Yup, Shylock is good... I use the newer version of his camera
Well, I can be of more help... what are you shooting?
Jeremy
Just shooting some coins right now, but only have halogen as a light source. It is drowning in light...
John
siliconvalleycoins.com
Shot this yesterday:
more in the am.
Good night.
John
siliconvalleycoins.com
- Use a tripod
- Use two lamps with standard 60W bulbs indoors (more consistent) or outdoor lighting
- Don't use a flash
- Use macro focusing (25 cm focusing distance worked best for me)
- Cut down the resolution to 3 megapixels (more than this just creates a larger file size)
- Cut down the f/stop a little from the maximum (widest) setting (f/3.5 worked best for me) for less lens distortion
- Use a fairly wide angle, but not the widest setting (f=12mm worked best for me) for less lens distortion
- Use ISO 100
- Overexpose by 1.0, i.e., set eV to +1.0
- Set white balance to incandescent lighting (indoors) or the appropriate outdoor setting (experiment)
- Use center mode autofocusing
- Use spot metering mode
- When saving the .jpg file, choose true color, progressive mode, and YUV422 subsampling
For a sample, see the picture of the 1900-S Morgan silver dollar at my link below. I am still having trouble with getting the file size down to <=100 KB for the registry sets and still keeping a reasonable quality image.
Check out a Vanguard Roth IRA.
"Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." -Luke 11:9
"Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might." -Deut. 6:4-5
"For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; He will save us." -Isaiah 33:22
Invest in some OTT-lights. You still need to play with light positioning and camera angles for EVERY coin depending on toning, metal type, etc., but the true color will be 95% spot on.
Backgrounds are very important also. A light cream textured background works well with no fussing with the white balance. Also, using a setting of 1600 x 1200 pixels is as much as would be necessary unless you're planning on using a multi-thousands dollar specialized color printer on Kodak papers.
Remember, most people only have equipment to view 72 dpi shots, and unless you have your own webserver for hosting (300 dpi or better possible), you'll lose a lot of original details and crispness by the time you've shrunk the jpeg down to under 50k.
John -- a while back I put together a few pages of boring details for a friend who had just purchased a Nikon 4500. It will put you to sleep but you may find some helpful tips, and save you the 2 years it took me to start taking decent copper images. I'm still learning as I go along and these pages could use an update. And I'm sure some experienced photographers can offer better advice.
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Besides my discontinued 995, I also own a Nikon 5700 5.0 megapixel that I haven't been as happy with for macro shots. Something about the lens on that 8X zoom camera that just doesn't capture the color & luster as well. Or maybe I just didn't stick with it long enough. The difference in a 3.0 and 5.0 megapixel camera's picture quality is negligible once you've reduced the images to internet acceptable sizes.
Thanks for the tips. You all have been great. Will work on it and get back to you with pics.
I have to leave school now. My camera and coins are calling. Who cares if it is finals week?????????
John
siliconvalleycoins.com
jom
Jeremy, great photo of a great coin. Good job.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.