Home U.S. Coin Forum

1865 3 cent nickel with mirror image outline of obverse shown on reverse

orevilleoreville Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
I have never seen such a clear outline of the head of liberty on the reverse of this 3 cent nickel before!!!!! It is clearly underneath the design elements of the reverse.

Is this rare? Any added value?

PCGS graded this MS-64 in the green insert.

Discussion?


image
A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!

Comments

  • bigtonydallasbigtonydallas Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭
    Cool! Value depends on how much is visible. Post a pic if you have one.
    Big Tony from Texas! Cherrypicking fool!!!!!!
  • Oreville, strong clashing is fairly common the Three Cent Nickels. Quite often near complete outlines from the opposite side can be seen. No value added as far as I know. They are neat though.
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Doesn't seem to add any value to IHC's. I have picked up three recently, two 64's and a 65. It makes you wonder what the mint employees were drinking at lunch time back then. I would pay a premium for them, but I am one of Anaconda's so-called coin weenies.


    I like yours very much, nice clash.
  • Oreville, clashing is most common on Three Cent Nickels, in my experience. As far as the effect of clashing on a coin's value, it can go either way. We have sold some Three Cent Nickels with heavy clash marks because a collector thought it was "neat" and was looking for clash marked coins. More commonly though, collectors of that series are looking for perfect examples and often find the clashing to be a distraction. Personally, I think that it is interesting and I place a "mental premium" on such pieces. Guess I am a coin weenie like IrishMike. image
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    no added $ value at all. in fact, 1865 w/ absolutely NO evidence of clashing at all are rare.

    plenty of added interest value, however!

    K S
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Well thanks! It is cool looking!

    Heck, I wonder if PCGS had downgraded this coin to MS-64 due to the reverse die clashes which could look like bag marks if looking real quickly because it sure looks more like a 65 to me.

    Here is the obverse (there is a planchet raised "chip" at 10 o clock!)

    http://imagehost.vendio.com/bin/imageserver.x/00000000/tbeanie2/DSC02277.JPG


    image
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • orevilleoreville Posts: 12,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    A close up of the obverse:

    image
    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
  • darktonedarktone Posts: 8,437 ✭✭✭
    those are neat oreville! I had one last year with rather well defined clashing- I think I started a thread on it if you do a search I am sure you can find it. mike
  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,745 ✭✭✭✭✭
    As stated,

    clash marks on three cent nickels are common. I actually prefer not to have them there if heavy.

    Others may,

    However, I do like that 3 cent nickel. Very nice coin with great eye-appeal.

  • shylockshylock Posts: 4,288 ✭✭✭
    1865 was a rough year in the mint, there are a lot of 'as struck' oddities in the IH series as well. IrishMike owns an IH from that date that's as deeply clashed as I've seen. I bought this scrubbed 1865 3-Cent Nick on Ebay cheap so he could add it to his cent, maybe start a date set of clashes!

    (chin is on top, nose at bottom)
    image
  • IrishMikeIrishMike Posts: 7,737 ✭✭✭
    Paul you are right I have started two date sets 64 & 65. I'll have to do a picture collage of all of them sometime.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file