PCGS grading HARD on Lincoln's. please let me know what u all think

The last two orders that i sent in, got graded really hard by PCGS, has there standards change with the new graders or what do u all think.. thank you
0
Comments
Registry 1909-1958 Proof Lincolns
I have two very nice NGC Proof Lincolns right here, that I will not send in, because I already know there is no chance now in their eyes. I wish they would change the slab inserts again, so I can distinguish coins that have been graded recently.
Yes, indeedy.
Here's a warning parable for coin collectors...
You should remember that for mint state Lincolns, PCGS takes the O in One Cent into account. If the O on your Lincoln is weak, you may not get the grade you desire and as such, you may be better off submitting the piece elsewhere in the present market.
Brian.
Quit wining guys !!!
Quit wining = Stop providing or entertaining with wine, or
Quit winning = Stop achieving success in an effort, or
Quit whining = Stop complaining or protesting in a childish fashion?
I vote for all three.
About Stewart: I vote for quit winning and making all those high-grade Lincolns as he wants all the best Lincolns for himself.
Tom
I'm considering breaking out the coins and submitting to NGC to try for the MS65 and/or red designation. Anyone else have good results doing this?
>>>What else do they look at besides the "O"on the cent that makes it a MS66 or 67...or even an 68???? Thank you very much for your comments David
for MS66 look for coins with a perfect face and VERY clean fields, for MS67 the fields must be perfect and you need something extra like a glow, forget about MS68 it won't happen regardless if you had a coin that was MS70, it won't go 68. The "O" in "ONE" goes hand in hand with the shoulder. I have not seen this matter with MS66 coins much as long as the coins are "as struck".
1 60103916 1941 1C MS67RD
1 60103917 1941 1C MS66RD
1 60103918 1941 1C MS66RD
1 60103919 1941 1C MS67RD
1 60103920 1941 1C MS66RD
2 60103921 1941-S 1C MS66RD
3 60103922 1942-S 1C MS67RD
4 60103923 1942 1C MS67RD
5 60103924 1942-D 1C MS66RD
6 60103925 1943 1C MS66
6 60103926 1943 1C MS66
7 60103927 1944 1C MS66RD
8 60103928 1944-D 1C MS67RD
9 60103929 1945 1C MS66RD
9 60103930 1945 1C MS67RD
9 60103931 1945 1C MS66RD
10 60103932 1945-D 1C MS67RD
10 60103933 1945-D 1C MS67RD
11 60103934 1946-D 1C MS66RD
12 60103935 1947 1C MS66RD
13 60103936 1947-D 1C MS66RD
13 60103937 1947-D 1C MS66RD
14 60103938 1949-D 1C MS66RD
14 60103939 1949-D 1C MS66RD
14 60103940 1949-D 1C MS66RD
15 60103941 1958 1C MS67RD
16 60103942 1946 1C MS66RD
Date Received: 06/04/2003
Date Shipped: No Date Specified
1946D
PCGS MS67RD = 97
NGC MS67RD = 355
AWWWWWWWWW thanks for letting me vent......
Don't change the prices, tighten (falsify, change, adjust) the grading.
If a 1980 MS65 had remained a 65 with the cert services, the grey sheet would have had to print headlines of the great drop in prices. As it was, with the grading just raised to impossible criteria, the market "appeared" to stay strong even though thousands of collectors lost their arses.
For a MS68 you need that mint frostiness and a nearly perfect coin with no specks and superb luster. A 67 can have a little variation in color as long as it is not too dramatic. You might see a small hit somewhere, but not in a focal area. A lot of nicer 67s have mint frost on them. Luster should also be excellent. A MS66 is less lustrous, with a couple small hits, shouldn't have any specks except maybe real tiny, in my opinion, but some do. The luster should still be very nice. Luster is the most important thing, then lack of hits, then strike. A MS68 needs to be superb in all 3 areas.
We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
RELLA
who boasts of twenty years experience in his craft
while in fact he has had only one year of experience...
twenty times.
All in all, I think they are still about the same they have been for a year or so, but that is still about three quarters to a full point away. Just adjust your standard and move on. That is what I had to do.
morris <><
** I would take a shack on the Rock over a castle in the sand !! **
Don't take life so seriously...nobody gets out alive.
ALL VALLEY COIN AND JEWELRY
28480 B OLD TOWN FRONT ST
TEMECULA, CA 92590
(951) 757-0334
www.allvalleycoinandjewelry.com
David, if you feel strong about the coins being undergraded, just hold onto them and resubmit at another time. Probably a crack out thing. I do this at a very, very high success rate.
1 21296099 1946-D 1C MS67RD Yes!!
1 21296100 1946-D 1C Damage Huh??
1 21296101 1946-D 1C MS66RD Okay
1 21296102 1946-D 1C MS66RD Okay
2 21296103 1945-S 1C MS65RD
2 21296104 1945-S 1C MS65RD
3 21296105 1949-S 1C MS65RD
3 21296106 1949-S 1C MS66RD Okay
4 21296107 1938-D/D 5C Buffalo MS64 Came from NGC MS66 Slab - Submitted Raw
This is what I got back a couple of weeks ago!!
1 21315554 1915 1C Artificial Color
2 21315555 1917 1C Cleaning
3 21315556 1919-D 1C Cleaning
4 21315557 1918-D 1C Artificial Color
Date Received: 07/17/2003
Date Shipped: 08/07/2003
Good thing these were CC submissions. The 15-P is an easy 66, best I have seen and a darn good coloring job also. The 17-P and 19-D are somewhat surprising, didn't see those BB coming. Both are 65's. I had a feeling about the 18-D after I picked it up in Long Beach. It is also easily a 65. Oh well, time to find someone who likes nice-looking unslabbed Lincolns.
Jeff
A few of those sevens could well been 8.
I still have approx,120 still pending grading.I have said this before,the coin has to be almost an 8 to get a 7
K S