Home U.S. Coin Forum

Pics from new camera - Nikon D100 - warning - large images

Well, i've been wanting to try to improve my images taken with a digital camera and while my Nikon Coolpix 4500 has and will do well,
i wanted to try and simply improve my ability to get a better focus, something i thought i could do with a SLR type of camera.

So, here's what i've come up with so far...and right now my primary challenge is improving my depth of field, which is a part of the focus issue, so one step forward, two back with hopefully a few more forward soon:

image
image

image

image

image

image

Comments

  • sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500
    Nice pictures -

    That dollar got a gift at 65 with those reeding marks in front of the ear don't you think?
  • ANACONDAANACONDA Posts: 4,692
    It certainly isn't prettier because of any imperfections.

    By the way - nice IHC. Do you know anything about that particular coin?
  • mdwoodsmdwoods Posts: 5,559 ✭✭✭
    Nice coins Adrian. It will be hard to improve on your photos though. You always did a super job of getting the colors. mdwoods
    National Register Of Big Trees

    We'll use our hands and hearts and if we must we'll use our heads.
  • MadMonkMadMonk Posts: 3,743
    Coin pics look good Adrian. I'm not familiar with that camera model. An SLR? Got to give you credit if that's the case. I believe I have a link to a how to article about coin photograpy with an SLR, and will search for it if you want. Which lens did you use? What kind of lighting (Soft white leaves less yellow) Ringed flourescent does well with color if I remember correctly. You make me want to ressurect my Minolta and give it a shot.
    BTW, here's the webpage info "coin photography made simple" by J.T. Stanton
    http://www.numis.net/101/index1.shtml
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    Interesting use of DOF especially with the label so close to the coin. You usually do not see this much impact of DOF within an item so small.

    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • ANACONDAANACONDA Posts: 4,692
    Coin pics look good Adrian.

    ............Thanks!

    I'm not familiar with that camera model. An SLR?

    ..........it's a single lens reflex..... digital camera. (at least that's what i think it is.....it looks like the cameras we used several years ago
    that weren't compact cameras that use through the lens technology...you look through the viewfinder and press the shutter and then
    what you saw goes away for a split second so something (a mirror) can move out of the way so the "film" can be exposed.

    Got to give you credit if that's the case.

    ..............I'll take it (even if you thought i was using film....i'm not. It's a digital camera)

    I believe I have a link to a how to article about coin photograpy with an SLR, and will search
    for it if you want. Which lens did you use?

    ..............The Nikon 100 mm macro lens....which is too putting me too far away from my subject and which doesn't telephoto. (Good bye lens.)

    What kind of lighting (Soft white leaves less yellow)

    ...........i used one of my secret lighting techniques (florescent light that was in the house when i bought it...located under the one of the
    kitchen cabinets. I jest you not.



  • ANACONDAANACONDA Posts: 4,692
    Cos said --

    "Interesting use of DOF especially with the label so close to the coin. You usually do not see this much impact
    of DOF within an item so small."

    Yeah, in a way it's kind of interesting ....but annoying....

    I'd like the whole coin to be as much in focus as possible ....but the part of the coin being out of focus does give a sense of realism to the
    image.....
  • MadMonkMadMonk Posts: 3,743
    Now you really have me curious, An SLR / Digital...Time for me to research the Nikon D100!



    6.1 Effective Megapixels for 3,008 x 2,000-pixel images Compact and lightweight (weighs approx. 14.7 oz.) New CCD sensor is the same size as that of D1 series SLRs lens image coverage factor x1.5) 3D Digital Matrix Image Control for precise exposure control, TTL auto white balance, and optimal color accuracy High-performance built-in Speedlight with D-TTL flash control for Multi-Sensor Balanced Fill-Flash. Also manual control GN 36 at ISO 100. Three color modes Five-Area Autofocus with Dynamic AF operation, Focus-tracking and Lock-on™ High-speed image processing provided by new one-chip system LSI Top shutter speed of 1/4,000 sec. and flash sync speed up to 1/180 sec. 30 second long exposures Plug-and-play USB1.1 interface for quick computer connection On-Demand Grid Lines can be displayed in viewfinder Custom Settings can be selected in the LCD monitor Compatible with Certified CompactFlash™ cards Type I and Type II, including 512MB/1GB IBM MicroDrive™ Nikon View 5 software (supplied) enables easy transfer, viewing and simple editing of images on your computer (Mac and PC) Optional Nikon Capture 3 software for excellent image management and remote operation Optional Multi Function Battery Pack MB-D100 accepts six 1.5V LR6 (AA-size alkaline) batteries or two Li-ion rechargeable batteries for extended shooting capability. Features voice memo recording/playback function, vertical shutter-release button, Command and Sub Command Dials, AF start button and a 10-pin remote terminal.

    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • ANACONDAANACONDA Posts: 4,692
    Maybe the term SLR should only apply to a camera that uses film. I'm not sure.

    Maybe "TTT (throught the lens technology) is the correct term.

    adrian
  • MadMonkMadMonk Posts: 3,743
    It's quite interesting. I've had no interest in digital cameras until I got into this Mad House (image)
    So, I kind of got the bug again. I just started seeing images that were hard for me to distinguish whether or not they were film or digital. until then, it was pretty obvious film had the edge for my taste.
    You got yourself quite a piece of work there Adrian.
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • When you take pictures at that high resolutuion you will ceratinly see EVERY small nick or imperfection in/on a coin. You don't see a lot of that stuff with the naked eye or even a 10X Loupe.

    Those coins and the photography are great!

    Edit: verb tense
  • dragondragon Posts: 4,548 ✭✭
    Very nice and clear pics Anaconda. Also very good portrayal of the toning, especially on the Morgan dollar, that looks very realistic. I like that 25-S Peace dollar, is it going to be up for sale on Ebay, I'd be interested in that one.


    dragon
  • Adrian,

    Beautiful photos!

    RE: focus....

    I used to shoot professionally with traditional SLRs (Nikon) in my distant past. On those cameras, Depth of Field was controlled by the aperture (higher number equals greater depth of field). Try setting your camera on a tripod, set the shutter speed slow enough to get the aperture (F-stop) to F16 or F22. This should increase your focus range and improve sharpness on your closeup pictures. You may have to use the self-timer to get rid of camera movement, or use a remote shutter release if your camera allows.

    Hope this helps...

    -craig
  • sinin1sinin1 Posts: 7,500
    I apologize for my first remark - what was I thinking, PCGS does not err - a 65 is a 65 is a 65 - it is just shown "larger than life" with the good photos.

    I also am jealous of your fine photos - I read my owners manual again to work on my macros and now am off to the store to get some low wattage Revel bulbs for capturing my color.


    One aspect of coins that is hard to capture is LUSTER - you did it on the walker, anyone have any ideas on showing off luster?

  • gripgrip Posts: 9,962 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Adrian
    Nice pictures.And when you use the coolpix 4500,how far away is the coin from the lens?Thanks.Al
    Still strugglingimage
  • WWWWWW Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭
    Hey Adrian, the D100 is a great D-SLR but you definitely need a different lens. I think some of the zooms listed will offer macro capability. WWW
  • BustmanBustman Posts: 1,911
    Snake,
    I own the latest, greatest canon digital slr camera that costs as much as some cars ( for work).....but I get better results from my coolpix when it comes to coin pictures.
    And yes, a digital camera can still be considered an SLR.


    My web site
  • Dog97Dog97 Posts: 7,874 ✭✭✭
    Snake you've clearly got the board members trained not to offer you any critisism so I'll go against the flow here. image
    The top Morgan picture is the only decent one, that's a very nice detailed picture and shows the colors nicely if you would crop out the bad plastic.
    The out of focus really detracts and takes away from the nice coins on the other ones. The blurry Barr cent makes me dizzy. I can't read the date on the 22 Peace or the WL Half and the coin's details are blurry. grrrrr.........
    Your old setup is much better.
    Change that we can believe in is that change which is 90% silver.
  • MadMonkMadMonk Posts: 3,743
    Hey dog97, I didnt critique because the Snake acknowledged that his depth of field, etc, needed work.
    Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
  • ANACONDAANACONDA Posts: 4,692
    "Your old setup is much better."

    Currently, you are correct.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file