Home› Q & A Forum
Options

What year would you say this wheat is ?

I found this wheat in a small coin collection my grandfather left me. It's in not that good of shape so it's hard to read the date. It's the top one that's in question. If it is a 1943 , is it still relevant to collectors in poor condition ?

Tagged:

Comments

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 40,130 ✭✭✭✭✭

    the photo is too small

    the chances of it being a 1943 is minuscule

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • Options
    GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Welcome to the forum
    Your photos are way too small to tell anything.
    Please supply a larger photo of the complete coin plus a closeup of the date.

  • Options

    I cropped the first photo

  • Options
    GreenstangGreenstang Posts: 1,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is not a 3 but hard to say exactly what the number is.

  • Options

    I did a side by side collage. Don't think I can post an internet image of the 43 on here though.

  • Options
    lcutlerlcutler Posts: 753 ✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a 45 to me, but really need a better picture.

  • Options
    WAYNEASWAYNEAS Posts: 7,276 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I too say it is a '45.
    Wayne

    Kennedys are my quest...

  • Options

    Thanks for taking a look ! I'm including a photo of the 45 wheat I have. I've compared the two and in my opinion the four is too small and the questionable 5 is too big

  • Options
    lcutlerlcutler Posts: 753 ✭✭✭✭

    I believe it's a 5, the lower part looks more like a gouge with some metal pushed up than part of the number.

  • Options
    Rholo3Rholo3 Posts: 15 ✭
    edited October 1, 2026 7:54AM

    NGC website has an image of the 43 with a small 4

  • Options
    jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rholo3 said:
    Thanks for taking a look ! I'm including a photo of the 45 wheat I have. I've compared the two and in my opinion the four is too small and the questionable 5 is too big

    You are welcome to any opinion you like. However, the size of the 4 remained the same throughout the decade while the final digit obviously changed every year. If you think that the 4 is the wrong size -- when it actually had only a single size throughout -- there's nothing else to discuss.

  • Options
    lcutlerlcutler Posts: 753 ✭✭✭✭

    Die wear, die polishing, wear on individual coins can cause variation in small details like numbers or letters from die to die and coin to coin. The 4 on the 1945 you picture has pretty heavy circulation flattening. It's not something that can be used to determine the date.

Sign In or Register to comment.