Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

How would you submit this coin to PCGS? Pattern coin in a non pattern holder.

redraiderredraider Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭✭

This coin is in a 1864 CN PF65 Holder. It was originally bought as a Bronze PF64BN NGC a few years ago. You can see where there is confusion....two grading companies with 2 very different opinions.

When I sent the coin to Rick Snow for a Photoseal, he did a XRF analysis and he determined that it is bronze on a thick planchet (Judd356A).

How would I go about submitting this coin back to PCGS to have them designate it correctly? They will probably need to do a metallurgic analysis as well, but that is not on any submission order sheet that I have seen. I don't want to crack it out and submit it raw.

Comments

  • Options
    lermishlermish Posts: 5,028 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I recently submitted a trade dollar that was in a business strike holder but which is, in actuality, a scarce proof strike variety.

    I submitted as a reholder with the additional comments field in all caps and highlighted asking them to see the attached documentation. And then I attached my highly annotated documentation.

    I think a similar process here would work.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,168 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 17, 2026 7:07AM

    I agree with @oih82w8 and wouldn’t even consider submitting it as a non-pattern.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    redraiderredraider Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

  • Options
    redraiderredraider Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    And then there is this.....Not in print in his guide, but it was added after he published his last attribution guide.
    It doesn't hurt that my name is here with the description of the holder!


  • Options
    CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    She’s a beauty, Jonathan! Best of luck going through this process. Good advice, too, from all three members above!
    Ken

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian
    Copperindian II
    Indy Eagles
    Gold Rush
    Bust Caps

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian
    Nickelodeon
    Early Walkers

    Successful transactions: Eagle Eye, redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector, BruceS

  • Options
    redraiderredraider Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks everyone! Will work on my submission and let everyone know the results.

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 517 ✭✭✭✭

    I have delt with similar situations. It may take a couple of attempts before they understand what it is you have and are asking. If possible, I would suggest bringing it to a show and submitting in person with all of the documentation.

  • Options
    retirednowretirednow Posts: 708 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You could ask Rick Snow to submit it for you ... I presumed he had several similar cases in the past.

    OMG ... My Mother was Right about Everything!
    I wake up with a Good Attitude Every Day. Then … Idiots Happen!

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @redraider said:
    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

    If they shot it through the plastic, that is not conclusive. If PCGS takes it out and shoots it, they may not get the same result.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 517 ✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @redraider said:
    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

    If they shot it through the plastic, that is not conclusive. If PCGS takes it out and shoots it, they may not get the same result.

    Still, the absence of any nickel is telling.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @redraider said:
    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

    If they shot it through the plastic, that is not conclusive. If PCGS takes it out and shoots it, they may not get the same result.

    Still, the absence of any nickel is telling.

    Is it? We shot a platinum silver eagle through the plastic and it came back as 95% SILVER with almost no platinum.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 517 ✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @redraider said:
    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

    If they shot it through the plastic, that is not conclusive. If PCGS takes it out and shoots it, they may not get the same result.

    Still, the absence of any nickel is telling.

    Is it? We shot a platinum silver eagle through the plastic and it came back as 95% SILVER with almost no platinum.

    I've never shot platinum, but I have had CN cents shot through plastic and they always showed at least some nickel.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,107 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @redraider said:
    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

    If they shot it through the plastic, that is not conclusive. If PCGS takes it out and shoots it, they may not get the same result.

    Still, the absence of any nickel is telling.

    Is it? We shot a platinum silver eagle through the plastic and it came back as 95% SILVER with almost no platinum.

    I've never shot platinum, but I have had CN cents shot through plastic and they always showed at least some nickel.

    Here's a fascinating article. I may give it its own thread:

    https://britnumsoc.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/269-xrf-slabs-oddie-blog-001.pdf

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 517 ✭✭✭✭
    edited September 18, 2026 10:34AM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @TrickleCharge said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @redraider said:
    This was the XRF result....Would PCGS take this as evidence? There is no indication of what was analyzed.

    If they shot it through the plastic, that is not conclusive. If PCGS takes it out and shoots it, they may not get the same result.

    Still, the absence of any nickel is telling.

    Is it? We shot a platinum silver eagle through the plastic and it came back as 95% SILVER with almost no platinum.

    I've never shot platinum, but I have had CN cents shot through plastic and they always showed at least some nickel.

    Here's a fascinating article. I may give it its own thread:

    https://britnumsoc.blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/269-xrf-slabs-oddie-blog-001.pdf

    That is an interesting article. Notice that the expected elements for each coin do show up at least in some amount. Even your platinum eagle showed some platinum.

    Best practice is to shoot the slab without coin and use those results to adjust the slab shot with the coin. It's not perfect, but should give a pretty good idea of composition. Looking at the image @redraider posted, it appears that Rick has his device set to remove the slab elements already.

    Edit: Hmm, well except in the case of the gold. That shows no gold at all in the slab. You should start a separate thread. I am more familiar with how the gun reads bronze and nickel through a slab. It is interesting to see how it reads other metals.

  • Options
    MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,782 ✭✭✭✭✭

    FWIW, I won’t buy patterns like this unless the composition is clearly stated on the label. Over the years, and especially in the early days of the TPGs, too many patterns were attributed by sight and guesswork, without proper testing. So if my coin, I would make that request. And in this case, I’d also request that the weight be noted, mostly to help future internet bidders.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • Options
    redraiderredraider Posts: 368 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks Andy! I agree with your assessment on buying patterns with known metal composition! This wasn't bought as a pattern. I originally bought it as an 1864 Bronze proof. I sent it to Rick for a photoseal and he noticed that it was a thick planchet. He removed it from the holder and then had it analyzed with the results you see above as a raw coin. He then submitted it to PCGS (with his evidence) and they still put it in a CN holder!

    Trying again the 2nd time around now!

  • Options
    CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Jonathan -
    I don’t know if this will help your case, but below is a MS coin with the composition:

    But, I’ll note they still attributed the variety incorrectly 😂

    Ken

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian
    Copperindian II
    Indy Eagles
    Gold Rush
    Bust Caps

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian
    Nickelodeon
    Early Walkers

    Successful transactions: Eagle Eye, redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector, BruceS

  • Options
    IkesTIkesT Posts: 4,617 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @redraider said:
    Thanks Andy! I agree with your assessment on buying patterns with known metal composition! This wasn't bought as a pattern. I originally bought it as an 1864 Bronze proof. I sent it to Rick for a photoseal and he noticed that it was a thick planchet. He removed it from the holder and then had it analyzed with the results you see above as a raw coin. He then submitted it to PCGS (with his evidence) and they still put it in a CN holder!

    Trying again the 2nd time around now!

    When supporting information is submitted with an order, is it seen by anyone in the grading room, or is it tossed out as soon as the package hits the receiving department?

  • Options
    renomedphysrenomedphys Posts: 4,019 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I believe it is as simple as resubmitting with variety attribution. You don’t even need to ask for a regrade. You can attest to your belief on the submission form by stating: Coin is a PATTERN, J-356-a. I don’t think your XRF results will be taken into account as fact but may help get the ball rolling 🫨🙃🤣

    Figuring this out is PCGS’ business and well within their wheelhouse, especially with a little guidance.

    If there is a coin number already associated with this variety then you should include it in your written testament, and that it’s your expectation that this coin should certify as such.

  • Options
    MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 40,122 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @renomedphys said:
    I believe it is as simple as resubmitting with variety attribution. You don’t even need to ask for a regrade. You can attest to your belief on the submission form by stating: Coin is a PATTERN, J-356-a. I don’t think your XRF results will be taken into account as fact but may help get the ball rolling 🫨🙃🤣

    Figuring this out is PCGS’ business and well within their wheelhouse, especially with a little guidance.

    If there is a coin number already associated with this variety then you should include it in your written testament, and that it’s your expectation that this coin should certify as such.

    but they want money to do an xrf and from past experiences attributions is hit-or-miss

    i'd suggest using a paper form and write all over it that it is bronze and provide the pattern number and pcgs coin number. i'd also include supporting evidence like the xrf picture

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file