Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Here is something you rarely, if ever, see. A 1936 proof set in OGP.

SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited September 15, 2026 7:34PM in U.S. Coin Forum

A 1936 proof set in OGP (wish it were mine).

Comments

  • Options
    tahbb143tahbb143 Posts: 387 ✭✭✭✭

    wow

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 34,010 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow is right. I wish I had that one as well

  • Options
    jacrispiesjacrispies Posts: 1,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Incredible! Is there an original box to go along with it? I'm guessing it is the exact same used for the other box type proof sets.

    "But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness and all these things shall be added unto you" Matthew 6:33. Young fellow suffering from Bust Half fever.
    BHNC #AN-10
    JRCS #1606

  • Options
    GoobGoob Posts: 568 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That’s incredible!!

    "Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
    - Someone, probably

  • Options
    HarlequinHarlequin Posts: 229 ✭✭✭

    Wowzer !!!!!!! Never saw one before. 😎

    🇺🇸 Harlequin
    harlequinnumismatic@gmail.com
    Home of the Americana Collection of USA silver coins

  • Options
    MeltdownMeltdown Posts: 9,283 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hmmm. Very cool. Where did you see it? What do the coins look like in person? I assume a little hazy at least.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fascinating, looks genuine too. A lot of times these are faked.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,468 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    Yesterday I was searching for 1936 proof sets in the Internet. I was directed to a hobby related site that had a forum discussion about a person who inherited a 1936 proof set in the cello envelopes. The forum discussion was posted in 2020.

    The person posted a photo of the 1936 proof set. I copied the photo and posted it in this thread.

    I thought it was very interesting to see a photo of what appears to be a 1936 proof set in OGP. I remember that many years ago on the US Coin Forum there was a thread posted by a person who, along with his siblings, inherited his grandparents' coin collection. That collection included many 1936-1964 proof sets in OGP, plus many Classic Commemorative coins. The grandparents acquired these and other coins in the 1930's and subsequent decades directly from the mint and stored them carefully. It was quite an enjoyable thread; and it included many photographs of the coins in the collection.

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/573989/recently-acquired-coin-collection-the-return#latest

    This should be the thread you reference.

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    FlyingAl.

    You are correct sir.

    I just sent a PM to Darth5oh to say hello and to suggest that he post a new forum thread giving an update on the status of his grandparents' coin collection.

  • Options
    CRHer700CRHer700 Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coinscratch should see this.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • Options
    CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 11,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @CRHer700 said:
    @Coinscratch should see this.

    Where can I get one :)
    So is it worth more in the cello or graded or does that depend on how spectacular they are??

  • Options
    PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,133 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I did not know that the 1936 proof coins that way. The ones I have seen came in a plastic/cellophane and in a 2x2 envelope.

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • Options
    CatbertCatbert Posts: 8,256 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting topic, but click bait thread title. 👎

    Seated Half Society member #38

    "She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
    running like a water color in the rain...."
  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Catbert said:
    Interesting topic, but click bait thread title. 👎

    I kind of like click bait titles. 😂

  • Options
    CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 11,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting click bait titles are all I ever click on, the rest of the crap is boring. :D

  • Options
    CatbertCatbert Posts: 8,256 ✭✭✭✭✭

    And yet it would be so easy and courteous to include what the thread is about.

    Seated Half Society member #38

    "She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
    running like a water color in the rain...."
  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Catbert.

    Ask and you shall receive :)

  • Options
    jmski52jmski52 Posts: 24,010 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I hope that Darth5oh decides to post an update. His threads were some of the best threads that this forum has had while I've been a member.

    Q: Are You Printing Money? Bernanke: Not Literally

    I knew it would happen.
  • Options
    seanqseanq Posts: 8,834 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    Darth5oh just sent me a PM.

    Some of his grandparents' collection has been sold. He bought out his relatives and now owns the rest, including better quality proof sets and Commemoratives.

    I remember the Darth5oh thread, it was an all-timer. Glad to hear the udpate and that the coins are still in good hands.

    Sean Reynolds

    Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.

    "Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,374 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What makes you think this is OGP??

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maywood.

    The pictured 1936 Proof Set in the cello envelopes (in my opening post to this thread) looks like the 1936 Proof Set (also in the same cello envelopes) Darth5oh inherited from his grandparents (who purchased same from the mint and on receipt kept it in the mint packaging) and posted photos of in his forum posts about his grandparents collection in 2007.

    So, I am assuming that Darth5oh's 1936 Proof Set is an example of one being in OGP.

    Since that set looks similar to the 1936 Proof Set pictured in my opening post to this thread I also assume that it is an example of one being in OGP. :)

  • Options
    cptbillycptbilly Posts: 135 ✭✭✭✭
    edited September 16, 2026 10:33AM

    @FlyingAl said:

    @SanctionII said:
    Yesterday I was searching for 1936 proof sets in the Internet. I was directed to a hobby related site that had a forum discussion about a person who inherited a 1936 proof set in the cello envelopes. The forum discussion was posted in 2020.

    The person posted a photo of the 1936 proof set. I copied the photo and posted it in this thread.

    I thought it was very interesting to see a photo of what appears to be a 1936 proof set in OGP. I remember that many years ago on the US Coin Forum there was a thread posted by a person who, along with his siblings, inherited his grandparents' coin collection. That collection included many 1936-1964 proof sets in OGP, plus many Classic Commemorative coins. The grandparents acquired these and other coins in the 1930's and subsequent decades directly from the mint and stored them carefully. It was quite an enjoyable thread; and it included many photographs of the coins in the collection.

    https://forums.collectors.com/discussion/573989/recently-acquired-coin-collection-the-return#latest

    This should be the thread you reference.

    Thanks for the Link, Flying AI. . .enjoyable back-story.

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,374 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Kevin, I guess what I'm asking is has anyone ever come across some documentation which details how the Mint "packaged" Proof coins from that era. I don't recall ever seeing anything.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maywood.

    I also do not recall seeing any such documentation.

  • Options
    FredSFredS Posts: 90 ✭✭✭

    Truth be told, you could just remove 5 coins from a 1955 set or earlier, and put your 1936 set in those cello wrappers. Who would know or be able to prove otherwise. That is the easy part. Now for the hard part, you have to find a 1936 proof set.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,127 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FredS said:
    Truth be told, you could just remove 5 coins from a 1955 set or earlier, and put your 1936 set in those cello wrappers. Who would know or be able to prove otherwise. That is the easy part. Now for the hard part, you have to find a 1936 proof set.

    Most of those wrappers are brittle and wouldn’t do well if coins were removed and replaced by others.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    FredSFredS Posts: 90 ✭✭✭
    edited September 16, 2026 1:45PM

    @MFeld said:

    @FredS said:
    Truth be told, you could just remove 5 coins from a 1955 set or earlier, and put your 1936 set in those cello wrappers. Who would know or be able to prove otherwise. That is the easy part. Now for the hard part, you have to find a 1936 proof set.

    Most of those wrappers are brittle and wouldn’t do well if coins were removed and replaced by others.

    How much would you care to wager on that? Send me a 1936 proof set and I will have it out the door, 5 minutes later, in OGP!!
    The defense rests.

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I just looked at Darth5oh's January, 2025 update thread and his 2007 sequel thread on his grandparents' coin collection. In those threads are photographs of multiple 1936-1942 proof sets, many of which are in cello sleeves and stapled together.

    Since those proof sets were acquired by his grandfather from the mint at the time of issue and upon receipt were kept as is (until Darth5oh and his siblings/cousins inherited same) I take it as proof that these early proof coins were placed by the mint in cello sleeves and shipped to buyers (with orders of multiple coins having the cello sleeves stapled together.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,127 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 16, 2026 2:12PM

    @FredS said:

    @MFeld said:

    @FredS said:
    Truth be told, you could just remove 5 coins from a 1955 set or earlier, and put your 1936 set in those cello wrappers. Who would know or be able to prove otherwise. That is the easy part. Now for the hard part, you have to find a 1936 proof set.

    Most of those wrappers are brittle and wouldn’t do well if coins were removed and replaced by others.

    How much would you care to wager on that? Send me a 1936 proof set and I will have it out the door, 5 minutes later, in OGP!!
    The defense rests.

    No matter how strongly I feel about something, I wouldn’t offer or accept a serious bet with a forum member over it.

    And by the way, the defense rested prematurely, without having proved 1) the source or type of the pictured packaging or 2) that its state of preservation is representative of what’s most likely to be found in original 1936 Proof sets.

    Edited to add: Where are the staples?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    FredSFredS Posts: 90 ✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @FredS said:

    @MFeld said:

    @FredS said:
    Truth be told, you could just remove 5 coins from a 1955 set or earlier, and put your 1936 set in those cello wrappers. Who would know or be able to prove otherwise. That is the easy part. Now for the hard part, you have to find a 1936 proof set.

    Most of those wrappers are brittle and wouldn’t do well if coins were removed and replaced by others.

    How much would you care to wager on that? Send me a 1936 proof set and I will have it out the door, 5 minutes later, in OGP!!
    The defense rests.

    No matter how strongly I feel about something, I wouldn’t offer or accept a serious bet with a forum member over it.

    And by the way, the defense rested prematurely, without having proved 1) the source or type of the pictured packaging or 2) that its state of preservation is representative of what’s most likely to be found in original 1936 Proof sets.

    Edited to add: Where are the staples?

    You can no more prove that there was not a 1936 set in there, than I can prove there was. My point, you can use ANY of the old wrappers, and no one would know otherwise. The staple would not go back in until it was sealed back up. The fascination on seeing a set in these cello wrappers, is mind numbing, when it is SO easy to put coins right back in them, if you wish to do it.

    The image in the OP looks a lot more fake than real cello plastic I have. These were from a 1952 unopened proof set, that I had graded, so I know they are original. If I would have posted a 1936 set in these, you would have believed it, if you believe the top one is real.

  • Options
    CoinscratchCoinscratch Posts: 11,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FredS said:

    @MFeld said:

    @FredS said:

    @MFeld said:

    @FredS said:
    Truth be told, you could just remove 5 coins from a 1955 set or earlier, and put your 1936 set in those cello wrappers. Who would know or be able to prove otherwise. That is the easy part. Now for the hard part, you have to find a 1936 proof set.

    Most of those wrappers are brittle and wouldn’t do well if coins were removed and replaced by others.

    How much would you care to wager on that? Send me a 1936 proof set and I will have it out the door, 5 minutes later, in OGP!!
    The defense rests.

    No matter how strongly I feel about something, I wouldn’t offer or accept a serious bet with a forum member over it.

    And by the way, the defense rested prematurely, without having proved 1) the source or type of the pictured packaging or 2) that its state of preservation is representative of what’s most likely to be found in original 1936 Proof sets.

    Edited to add: Where are the staples?

    You can no more prove that there was not a 1936 set in there, than I can prove there was. My point, you can use ANY of the old wrappers, and no one would know otherwise. The staple would not go back in until it was sealed back up. The fascination on seeing a set in these cello wrappers, is mind numbing, when it is SO easy to put coins right back in them, if you wish to do it.

    The image in the OP looks a lot more fake than real cello plastic I have. These were from a 1952 unopened proof set, that I had graded, so I know they are original. If I would have posted a 1936 set in these, you would have believed it, if you believe the top one is real.

    The cellos definitely look different from yours which are shorter in length and they have some type of a pressing seal you can notice on the right side which could be a telltale sign of authenticity.

    I’m in the camp that I don’t have a clue what they’re supposed to look like but they’re definitely different and also separated by almost 20 years.

  • Options
    cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,839 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It would make an interesting idea for a set to have a complete run from 1936-1942 in the original government packaging. Does he still own the proof sets?

  • Options
    normmalinnormmalin Posts: 261 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Newbie here with a distantly related question -- if you have a proof set in a box that has never been opened, should you leave it sealed? Is there a loss of value by breaking the seal? In the case of this thread, what if the box had never been opened? Thanks

    Casual collector slowly building a collection....

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 16, 2026 7:55PM

    "Is there a loss of value by breaking the seal?"

    Depends on who you ask. Some people put a higher value on "unsearched" items than other people do.

    edited to add... With regards to the set in this thread, I would expect that, due to the packaging materials used in these sets, it's more likely the coins would look worse than average rather than better. JMO, YMMV.

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,374 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Just for clarity, it wasn’t my intention to cause any strife with my simple question. It’s just that all we have had and continue to have even now is anecdotal evidence. Sadly, those people who could provide more reliable(yet still anecdotal) evidence have all died.

    For my own part, there was a local Coin Club member whose father was supposed to have a run of sets dated back to 1936 still in the OGP, but nobody I know ever saw them. That man and his father are both dead now and the whereabouts of the sets is a mystery.

    Absent any sort of documentation such as Mint correspondence(man, I miss @PhillyJoe) this is one of the more enduring recent Numismatic Urban Myths, right behind the 1964 Peace Dollar. Perhaps some future reasearcher or Heir(s) will help to solve it. Till then, I guess each of us will believe what we choose.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,179 ✭✭✭✭✭

    cameonut2011.

    Darth5oh is the current owner of all of the 1936-1942 proof sets that were acquired by his grandfather directly from the mint. He bought out the interest of his 5 siblings and cousins. If I recall correctly for each year from 1936-1942 his grandfather purchased either one set or two sets. He has had some, if not all, of these proof sets graded.

    If he chooses to look at this thread perhaps he will post a reply that provides information about the history of these proof sets, including information about the cello sleeves the coins were contained in.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file