Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

"California Gold" authenticity question

cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,065 ✭✭✭✭✭

I got these at a show recently. The dealer had a number of them available, but all but the 2 I bought were obviously modern fakes. These are both "bear" coins without denominations, so I know they aren't period, but I know people still collect them. I don't have the Bree/Gillio book, but they resemble some of the ones I've seen certified online and will get the book and spend time attributing them once I know if they're real or not.

What bothers me about both of them is that while they show wear, errors, and are very thin, the rims look odd and I think I can see copper showing through in places.

Am I correct in my assumption they are fakes? I got them for a dollar apiece so I'm not really out much on this gamble. Thanks in advance!


You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.

Comments

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 47,600 ✭✭✭✭✭

    All the Breen-Gillio types are shown here in the PCGS Coin Facts site where they show pics of each B-G type. If you don't see your coin there, you have a token, replica, charm, or fantasy coin many of which are back dated and modern.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    dcarrdcarr Posts: 10,149 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PerryHall said:
    All the Breen-Gillio types are shown here in the PCGS Coin Facts site where they show pics of each B-G type. If you don't see your coin there, you have a token, replica, charm, or fantasy coin many of which are back dated and modern.

    .

    Some of the "charms" can still be worth a good amount, if they were made circa 1930s or before.
    The one on the right appears to match the "1875 Arms of California #1" shown on this page:
    calgoldcoin.com/oldhtml/wreath2.htm
    It is described as being "fairly common" (as charms go).

    .

  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,065 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 16, 2026 1:24PM

    Thanks, everyone! Both pieces definitely fall into the token/charm category. Being a variety guy, I really like the blundered 'R' in 'EUREKA' (it appears to be a R/K) on the larger one and the E/? and blundered 'N' on the smaller one.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file