Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

1956 Proof Type 1 Half - Coin received, new photos attached

SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited June 27, 2026 6:37PM in U.S. Coin Forum


It is a new EBay purchase.

Comments

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,382 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Very nice! Needs new images, but I’d say it looks like a solid CAM to me!

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree.
    The stronger reverse slightly carries the weaker obverse.
    CAMEO would be a fair assessment.

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 20, 2026 6:11PM

    There’s an old adage that the reverse won’t necessarily take the grade up but it might take it down. With that in mind and judging what looks like weak overall frost on the obverse coupled with some clear hairlines I would say PR66 no-Cam.

    My searching has shown that there are many one sided Cam/Deep Cam coins from the 1950’s, the Mint had a bad habit of switching only one die.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,929 ✭✭✭✭✭

    it looks very nice in your pics

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As we know, accurately grading a proof coin from a photo (numerical grade and designation, if any) consistently is impossible.

    For this coin the obverse photo does not show the coin as it looks in hand. It shows frosted devices, but it could be less or more than it appears. There are hints the obverse frost is similar to the reverse frost.

    I will post photos of the coin when I receive it.

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Kevin, your above post is rather confusing. You state that the photo “does not show the coin as it looks in hand” while also saying “I will post photos of the coin when I receive it” so have you seen the coin or not?? I am thinking not which is OK.

    Logic tells me that the seller posted pictures to show the coin at its best so it won’t look better when it arrives, although I hope it does.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maywood.

    I took a gamble and bought the proof set containing the half dollar based upon the photos only.

    I may win or I may lose. I decided to give it a shot. I bought a similar 1956 proof set with a frosted Type 1 half. I submitted it for grading and our host graded it PF66CAM. Maybe I will get lucky on this one also.

  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 23, 2026 7:43AM

    It looks very nice. Would wager cameo.

    Investor
  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,045 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yowza. Even if it doesn't make cameo, the premium for the variety alone justifies the grading fees. I've done very well cherrypicking/certifying these over the years.

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I used to search eBay for encapsulated 1956 Franklins with the hope of finding a T1 listed as a T2. Never found a Cam/DCam but several brilliant coins. That window has pretty much closed now.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,106 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like that one a lot! Are the lines on the obverse as-struck or are they minor hairlines?

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks pretty nice to me.
    I hope you have good luck with it.
    How can you tell a type 1 from a type 2?

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP PROMETHIUS88

  • Options
    CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,432 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like a solid shot at cameo to me. Boy, those Type 1s are tough in cam.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 22, 2026 2:43PM

    Here are additional Seller's photos of the obverse of the half dollar that show the obverse frost a little differently from the photo in my opening post. I think that the obverse frost is heavy enough to warrant a Cameo designation. :)


  • Options
    ShaunBC5ShaunBC5 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I love a type 1! I’ll be surprised if you get a cameo designation out of it, but I hope you do. You’ve got a lot more experience with the CAMs than me. It just seems like a little lack of cameo on the cheek indention is enough to keep it out. I hope it’s great in hand.
    Was/is the seller a a knowledgeable coin pro, or likely just a random heir?

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The proof set is being delivered to me today (so I have been told).

    Looking forward to seeing the half dollar in hand

  • Options
    davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,929 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    Here are additional Seller's photos of the obverse of the half dollar that show the obverse frost a little differently from the photo in my opening post. I think that the obverse frost is heavy enough to warrant a Cameo designation. :)

    \

    This one suggests to me you won't get the CAM, but still very nice

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 27, 2026 6:38PM


    Your thoughts.

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Definitely a non-Cameo to me. The above pictures look like “lamp shade” pictures with diffused light which always gives an enhanced look of the coin. I’ll stick with my initial PR66.

    1956 Type1’s in Cam/DCam are very scarce and I admire you for continuing the hunt, I gave up long ago.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maywood.

    The coin does have obverse frost that is not as heavy as the reverse frost. I think it will not receive a Cameo designation. However in 2024 I submitted a similar Type 1 half that I thought would not Cameo, To my surprise PCGS graded it PF66CAM.

    This newly acquired coin is gorgeous :)

  • Options
    humanssuckhumanssuck Posts: 666 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coin looks gorgeous, nice pickup.

    Obverse looks just ever so slightly short of a CAM.

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here is the PF66CAM I made in 2024. It looks similar to the half I received today.


  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The new coin does have a nice look. My question is this: Do you think PCGS grades the Type One coins differently??

    Another observation is that all the images which show these coins to have wonderful contrast appear to have been shot with low light which will accentuate the contrast. JMHO.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maywood.

    I have seen three Type 1 halves in hand that have frosted devices on both sides. Two have been graded by our host. One is the PF66CAM I made that now sits in my Registry Set of proof Franklin halves with major varieties. The other is a PF68CAM CAC previously owned by Winesteven. The third coin is the raw coin I received yesterday. All three coins have heavy reverse frost and obverse frost that is moderate at best.

    I will send my new raw Type 1 in for grading. It may or may not CAM.

    I think that if the three halves mentioned above were Type 2 none of them would have received a CAM (my opinion is based on my grading results on multiple Type 2 halves that I have submitted that have heavy frost on both sides and mirrored fields that did not receive a CAM designation).

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have also found quite a few reverse frosted Type 1's where the obverse ranges from brilliant to very light frost.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have a Type 1 half that has a heavily frosted reverse and a brilliant obverse.

  • Options
    MaywoodMaywood Posts: 4,129 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Kevin, please keep us posted on a submission, results and TV's.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • Options
    SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 13,000 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Maywood.

    Will do.

    I am going to submit this Type 1 half dollar to our host for grading later this month along with some other coins I recently acquired, including some or all of a 1942 proof set (especially the half), a toned 1952 proof dime and a 1952 proof Superbird quarter.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file