Options
GTG: 1869 half
scotty1419
Posts: 1,134 ✭✭✭
Would appreciate opinions on this one. Thanks!
Edit: Updated pictures.
0
Comments
Looks cleaned to me. Its hard to tell with the pics 😕
Edit: Cleaned up photos in original post.
The obverse has a "worked" sort of a look to me. From the initial pics of the reverse... can't tell, but could be PVC damage. Those spots look dark green to me...
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
AU details.
Net XF40 cleaned/altered surfaces.
Worked is a good description.
Cleaned AU
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.
Not an easy date in the series - but there are many.
Nice strike.
Lots of lines in fields. Dark spots on reverse and by elbow.
I agree with AU detail.
The coin looks like it was cleaned perhaps harshly and the obverse and reverse don't match.
Cleaned
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
Appreciate the feedback!
The debris on the reverse is black in nature. May simply be very aged PVC...
There's a fair bit of luster on the obverse around the stars and date with more on the reverse throughout motto.
Agree that the fields issues. Without the problems, I'd imagine it at 53/55, however a net low/mid XF is probably accurate.