Home Sports Talk

2026 Kentucky Derby

BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

It's that time of year again. 1 week to go. A field of 20 will run. Many variables and angles abound. Mike Smith seeks to become oldest winning jockey of the Derby. Father/son combination of the Motts racing against each other. Baffert in with 2 charges. Horses from Japan.
Who do you like?

Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".

Comments

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I just don't follow horse racing any longer. I can't even name a single horse in the race.

    Would be nice if Mike Smith brings it home. He always was a class act.

  • craig44craig44 Posts: 12,704 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I dont know the first thing about horse racing, but last summer the Fam and I spent a day at Churchill Downs while on vacation touring the grounds/museum (my daughter is into horses/racing) It is an amazing facility with awesome history. we toured the stables and i have never seen horses like that.

    There is a whole "town" to the side of the track behind Churchill downs where all the workers live during race season. there is a school, church, restaurant, apartments etc.

    I learned a lot and came to have a better appreciation of racing.

    George Brett, Roger Clemens and Tommy Brady.

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 27, 2026 4:02PM

    FWIW here are my plays for the Derby: Commandment and Further Ado to win. So Happy and Golden Tempo to show. Good luck to all who partake in the race.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • estangestang Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭

    If I'm around a TV, I will catch only the race itself.

    The track will appear to be dry and temps on the cool side.

    You think these horses have any realization of what awaits them after they win?

    Enjoy your collection!
    Erik
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @estang said:
    If I'm around a TV, I will catch only the race itself.

    The track will appear to be dry and temps on the cool side.

    You think these horses have any realization of what awaits them after they win?

    Hopefully a good bath,rubdown, and the best oats,carrots,mints money can buy.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • estangestang Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭

    @BLUEJAYWAY said:

    @estang said:
    If I'm around a TV, I will catch only the race itself.

    The track will appear to be dry and temps on the cool side.

    You think these horses have any realization of what awaits them after they win?

    Hopefully a good bath,rubdown, and the best oats,carrots,mints money can buy.

    I was thinking more about the myriad or harem of mares - lol.

    Enjoy your collection!
    Erik
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Me and a group of buddies will go to the local casino and rip it up, I won't even watch the race but will enjoy everything else

    I haven't bet on a horse or dog race since the 90's

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @estang said:

    @BLUEJAYWAY said:

    @estang said:
    If I'm around a TV, I will catch only the race itself.

    The track will appear to be dry and temps on the cool side.

    You think these horses have any realization of what awaits them after they win?

    Hopefully a good bath,rubdown, and the best oats,carrots,mints money can buy.

    I was thinking more about the myriad or harem of mares - lol.

    There's that too.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Here's the Exacta, COLD

    6-Commandment
    15-Emerging Market

    You're welcome.

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Dave99B said:
    Here's the Exacta, COLD

    6-Commandment
    15-Emerging Market

    You're welcome.

    Dave

    Do you ever consider reversing your exactas just in case the result flips? Say on a DQ. Or if the bet had 2 longshots?

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Dave99B said:
    Here's the Exacta, COLD

    6-Commandment
    15-Emerging Market

    You're welcome.

    Dave

    I’m not crazy about the 15 post in a 20 horse race. Renegade drew the rail which is a huge advantage as long as the track is fast. I’ll post my picks (as usual) Saturday.

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2dueces said:

    @Dave99B said:
    Here's the Exacta, COLD

    6-Commandment
    15-Emerging Market

    You're welcome.

    Dave

    I’m not crazy about the 15 post in a 20 horse race. Renegade drew the rail which is a huge advantage as long as the track is fast. I’ll post my picks (as usual) Saturday.

    Looking forward to your picks as well as any other players picks.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BLUEJAYWAY said:

    @Dave99B said:
    Here's the Exacta, COLD

    6-Commandment
    15-Emerging Market

    You're welcome.

    Dave

    Do you ever consider reversing your exactas just in case the result flips? Say on a DQ. Or if the bet had 2 longshots?

    I rarely box Exactas. I've been burned many times, but I'm a go big or go home guy.

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭
    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Heading out to Shreveport in a bit. A little hold-em and then to Louisiana Downs for the Derby.
    I like to pick early and stay with it so I’ll swing by the Downs and get my tickets.
    Track is cool and fast and I’ve always liked deep closers in 3 year olds. Further Ado and Golden Tempo fit the bill.
    Good luck everyone and enjoy the day.

    1 Renegade
    6 Commandment 20 WPS
    19 Golden Tempo. 5 WPS
    18 Further Ado
    4 horse Exacta box 1-6-18-19
    4 horse Trifecta 1-6-18-19

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • perkdogperkdog Posts: 33,610 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2dueces said:
    Heading out to Shreveport in a bit. A little hold-em and then to Louisiana Downs for the Derby.
    I like to pick early and stay with it so I’ll swing by the Downs and get my tickets.
    Track is cool and fast and I’ve always liked deep closers in 3 year olds. Further Ado and Golden Tempo fit the bill.
    Good luck everyone and enjoy the day.

    1 Renegade
    6 Commandment 20 WPS
    19 Golden Tempo. 5 WPS
    18 Further Ado
    4 horse Exacta box 1-6-18-19
    4 horse Trifecta 1-6-18-19

    Enjoy Joe!!!!

  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Another derby winner. Oh my!!

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cost $123
    Win $120.60
    Place $47.85
    Show $29.75
    Exacta $139.43
    Total $337.63

    Nice day at the track

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Small profit for me. Bet $8 got back $11.90 on my show bet on the winner. 2 win bets failed as well as my other show bet. Not a big player, but like to be in it.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2dueces said:
    Cost $123
    Win $120.60
    Place $47.85
    Show $29.75
    Exacta $139.43
    Total $337.63

    Nice day at the track

    Heckuva pick. That horse got up for ya!

  • galaxy27galaxy27 Posts: 9,882 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 3, 2026 5:58AM

    sick derby

    a horse that had that dawg in him

    Golden Tempo running a 1.7 forty down the backstretch and sucking everyone up

  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BLUEJAYWAY said:
    Small profit for me. Bet $8 got back $11.90 on my show bet on the winner. 2 win bets failed as well as my other show bet. Not a big player, but like to be in it.

    A win is a win. Nice job.

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Somewhat interesting facts. Golden Tempo had minor cracked heels on both front feet. And Renegade was equipped with special shoes.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Derby winner Golden Tempo out for Preakness. Not unexpected. Distance shorter, horse liked a longer race. Will be saving the charge for the Belmont Stakes at Saratoga. Same Derby distance. Belmont Stakes shortened up from 1 1/2 to 1 1/4 while at Saratoga due to track configuration.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Crude Velocity (3-0-0)
    Taj Mahal (3-0-0)
    Two undefeated horses enter the Preakness. Crude Velocity is the early line favorite at 3-1

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The trainer of Golden Tempo is a native of Saratoga Springs so she would like to win the Belmont Stakes there in front of the home crowd.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They need to do something about the triple crown. Its basically just dead after the derby every year with the winner sitting out the next leg

    Fire AJ Preller

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:
    They need to do something about the triple crown. Its basically just dead after the derby every year with the winner sitting out the next leg

    There is talk of increasing the 2 weeks between KD and Preakness to 3 and moving the Belmont to a later start. There is push back from the NYRA on any changes and purists who feel it dimishes past triple crown champions who survived the past conditions.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BLUEJAYWAY said:

    @Basebal21 said:
    They need to do something about the triple crown. Its basically just dead after the derby every year with the winner sitting out the next leg

    There is talk of increasing the 2 weeks between KD and Preakness to 3 and moving the Belmont to a later start. There is push back from the NYRA on any changes and purists who feel it dimishes past triple crown champions who survived the past conditions.

    I definitely get the diminishing part of it but at the same time when the derby winner doesnt even try the second race it really makes it meaningless. Maybe move the Belmont to second which is by far the longest and then make it almost impossible to a horse to sit out the Preakness if they won both. Its really not that much shorter than the derby and its not like the trainers arent running the horses anyways during the time between

    Fire AJ Preller

  • 2dueces2dueces Posts: 6,865 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The winner sits out because stud fees are astronomical for a Derby winner. Losing the Preakness is like losing money for owners or syndications.
    But I whole heartedly agree. A horse has one chance to win the triple crown and he should be given that chance

    W.C.Fields
    "I spent 50% of my money on alcohol, women, and gambling. The other half I wasted.
  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2dueces said:
    The winner sits out because stud fees are astronomical for a Derby winner. Losing the Preakness is like losing money for owners or syndications.
    But I whole heartedly agree. A horse has one chance to win the triple crown and he should be given that chance

    Stud fees definitely are the money maker. What I dont get though is the logic of it. If you want to protect the stud fee why not just retire the horse after the derby. Skipping the second leg then running the third its the same risk of losing. Not to mention if you win the triple crown or even finish at the top of all three the stud fee goes up very quickly.

    Fire AJ Preller

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I doubt very much if the stud fees barely change one cent from winning the Triple Crown versus "only" winning the Derby and the Belmont.

    Firstly, that horse was 23-1 in the Derby, and the race just happened to set-up perfectly for it. Secondly In the Preakness, it probably would have went off around 4-1, and likely finished out of the money.

    That trainer is a sharp cookie. She absolutely is making the right decision, skipping the Preakness, and I think it's an easy call, certainly a wise call.

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:
    I doubt very much if the stud fees barely change one cent from winning the Triple Crown versus "only" winning the Derby and the Belmont.

    Firstly, that horse was 23-1 in the Derby, and the race just happened to set-up perfectly for it. Secondly In the Preakness, it probably would have went off around 4-1, and likely finished out of the money.

    That trainer is a sharp cookie. She absolutely is making the right decision, skipping the Preakness, and I think it's an easy call, certainly a wise call.

    They change drastically.

    Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown to over 200k for a live foal. They will come back down if their kids arent successful or they have problems breeding, arent considered big enough etc. In those cases the pedigree of success would be even more important

    Fire AJ Preller

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @stevek said:
    I doubt very much if the stud fees barely change one cent from winning the Triple Crown versus "only" winning the Derby and the Belmont.

    Firstly, that horse was 23-1 in the Derby, and the race just happened to set-up perfectly for it. Secondly In the Preakness, it probably would have went off around 4-1, and likely finished out of the money.

    That trainer is a sharp cookie. She absolutely is making the right decision, skipping the Preakness, and I think it's an easy call, certainly a wise call.

    They change drastically.

    Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown to over 200k for a live foal. They will come back down if their kids arent successful or they have problems breeding, arent considered big enough etc. In those cases the pedigree of success would be even more important

    "Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown"

    That is opinion which is fine, but it's not fact.

    Besides these are highly inbred thoroughbred race horses. They all have various "problems", just a question of how bad. What if the horse breaks down in the Preakness and has to be humanely destroyed? Then the stud fees are zero.

    Every possibility must be taken into account, and this excellent trainer is doing precisely that.

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @stevek said:
    I doubt very much if the stud fees barely change one cent from winning the Triple Crown versus "only" winning the Derby and the Belmont.

    Firstly, that horse was 23-1 in the Derby, and the race just happened to set-up perfectly for it. Secondly In the Preakness, it probably would have went off around 4-1, and likely finished out of the money.

    That trainer is a sharp cookie. She absolutely is making the right decision, skipping the Preakness, and I think it's an easy call, certainly a wise call.

    They change drastically.

    Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown to over 200k for a live foal. They will come back down if their kids arent successful or they have problems breeding, arent considered big enough etc. In those cases the pedigree of success would be even more important

    "Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown"

    That is opinion which is fine, but it's not fact.

    Besides these are highly inbred thoroughbred race horses. They all have various "problems", just a question of how bad. What if the horse breaks down in the Preakness and has to be humanely destroyed? Then the stud fees are zero.

    Every possibility must be taken into account, and this excellent trainer is doing precisely that.

    Its a fact his breeding rights increased. They dont breed while they race, they breed when they retire. They didnt double immediately but they went up significantly when the triple crown was won. His breeding right which had been sold for 60 million also went to 75 million for winning the triple crown.

    Your argument about keeping them out of the Preakness applies to all future races which just supports if you are going to retire them do it dont skip a leg

    But yes it is fact winning the triple crown increases breeding fees and sale prices, its not an opinion

    Fire AJ Preller

  • stevekstevek Posts: 31,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Basebal21 said:

    @stevek said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @stevek said:
    I doubt very much if the stud fees barely change one cent from winning the Triple Crown versus "only" winning the Derby and the Belmont.

    Firstly, that horse was 23-1 in the Derby, and the race just happened to set-up perfectly for it. Secondly In the Preakness, it probably would have went off around 4-1, and likely finished out of the money.

    That trainer is a sharp cookie. She absolutely is making the right decision, skipping the Preakness, and I think it's an easy call, certainly a wise call.

    They change drastically.

    Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown to over 200k for a live foal. They will come back down if their kids arent successful or they have problems breeding, arent considered big enough etc. In those cases the pedigree of success would be even more important

    "Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown"

    That is opinion which is fine, but it's not fact.

    Besides these are highly inbred thoroughbred race horses. They all have various "problems", just a question of how bad. What if the horse breaks down in the Preakness and has to be humanely destroyed? Then the stud fees are zero.

    Every possibility must be taken into account, and this excellent trainer is doing precisely that.

    Its a fact his breeding rights increased. They dont breed while they race, they breed when they retire. They didnt double immediately but they went up significantly when the triple crown was won. His breeding right which had been sold for 60 million also went to 75 million for winning the triple crown.

    Your argument about keeping them out of the Preakness applies to all future races which just supports if you are going to retire them do it dont skip a leg

    But yes it is fact winning the triple crown increases breeding fees and sale prices, its not an opinion

    "They dont breed while they race, they breed when they retire."

    I never knew that. I woulda thought they'd find a way to sneak into a mare's stall at night when nobody was looking. LOL

  • Basebal21Basebal21 Posts: 5,152 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @stevek said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @stevek said:

    @Basebal21 said:

    @stevek said:
    I doubt very much if the stud fees barely change one cent from winning the Triple Crown versus "only" winning the Derby and the Belmont.

    Firstly, that horse was 23-1 in the Derby, and the race just happened to set-up perfectly for it. Secondly In the Preakness, it probably would have went off around 4-1, and likely finished out of the money.

    That trainer is a sharp cookie. She absolutely is making the right decision, skipping the Preakness, and I think it's an easy call, certainly a wise call.

    They change drastically.

    Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown to over 200k for a live foal. They will come back down if their kids arent successful or they have problems breeding, arent considered big enough etc. In those cases the pedigree of success would be even more important

    "Justifys stud fee more than doubled winning the triple crown"

    That is opinion which is fine, but it's not fact.

    Besides these are highly inbred thoroughbred race horses. They all have various "problems", just a question of how bad. What if the horse breaks down in the Preakness and has to be humanely destroyed? Then the stud fees are zero.

    Every possibility must be taken into account, and this excellent trainer is doing precisely that.

    Its a fact his breeding rights increased. They dont breed while they race, they breed when they retire. They didnt double immediately but they went up significantly when the triple crown was won. His breeding right which had been sold for 60 million also went to 75 million for winning the triple crown.

    Your argument about keeping them out of the Preakness applies to all future races which just supports if you are going to retire them do it dont skip a leg

    But yes it is fact winning the triple crown increases breeding fees and sale prices, its not an opinion

    "They dont breed while they race, they breed when they retire."

    I never knew that. I woulda thought they'd find a way to sneak into a mare's stall at night when nobody was looking. LOL

    Derby horses have to be 3 years old to qualify. Cus of the dating system there have been some two year olds biologically by a couple months

    You get one shot at the Derby thats it, they dont run twice

    Fire AJ Preller

  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 11,337 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It is a well known fact that all these star horses that retire at 3-4 years of age deprives the fan base of enjoying their performances. I fully understand why they do retire as the aforementioned reasons noted by the other posters have said.
    But racing continues to delete it's fan base by this early retirement concern. Racing must battle for fans with so many other sports as it is. Imagine if all the popular known sports stars retired after 2-3 years.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
Sign In or Register to comment.