@Morgan13 said:
The toning is not really very nice but on the other hand it may be an original coin. 1921 Morgan's typically do not develop nice toning.
The coin looks about as original as you’re going to see. However, I think it’s a good example of a coin being highly original looking, but not necessarily also highly desirable.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I never want to disappoint anyone with an opinion about their coins as I have had coins I thought were ok, just to have gotten a reality check when presented to this forum. @PTVETTER, if you like what you purchased, than that’s all that matters. Own it and be happy with your purchase.
Zack
@Walkerguy21D said:
Agree with the other comments; but the OP is pretty savvy, so I’m assuming there’s something special about the coin that I’m missing….
I wouldn’t make such an assumption, no matter who the buyer was. We have no idea whether the coin was bought cheaply or at a premium.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@Walkerguy21D said:
Agree with the other comments; but the OP is pretty savvy, so I’m assuming there’s something special about the coin that I’m missing….
I wouldn’t make such an assumption, no matter who the buyer was. We have no idea whether the coin was bought cheaply or at a premium.
I don’t know either, but I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt, and I’m expressing my opinion that he probably knew what he was doing.
@Walkerguy21D said:
Agree with the other comments; but the OP is pretty savvy, so I’m assuming there’s something special about the coin that I’m missing….
I wouldn’t make such an assumption, no matter who the buyer was. We have no idea whether the coin was bought cheaply or at a premium.
I don’t know either, but I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt, and I’m expressing my opinion that he probably knew what he was doing.
The point I was trying to make is that I wouldn’t assume that there’s something special about the coin that you’re missing. Sure, that could be the case, but he might have just as easily bought the coin as an ordinary example that was priced right.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@Walkerguy21D said:
Agree with the other comments; but the OP is pretty savvy, so I’m assuming there’s something special about the coin that I’m missing….
I wouldn’t make such an assumption, no matter who the buyer was. We have no idea whether the coin was bought cheaply or at a premium.
I don’t know either, but I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt, and I’m expressing my opinion that he probably knew what he was doing.
The point I was trying to make is that I wouldn’t assume that there’s something special about the coin that you’re missing. Sure, that could be the case, but he might have just as easily bought the coin as an ordinary example that was priced right.
Comments
not for me
Interesting coin. Nice OGH but I don't really dig the color.
Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
If it has good luster you could send to cac for the homerun.
I will be taking it the PAN show the end of May
Ugly. I hope it was cheap.
What type of “homerun” are you talking about? I don’t see any type of “homerun” potential in a submission to CAC.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
=
what am i missing?
801 Reverse DDR?
Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Pass
Since you asked, yuck.
Keeper of the VAM Catalog • Professional Coin Imaging • Prime Number Set • World Coins in Early America • British Trade Dollars • Variety Attribution
I've been shocked from time to time with cac. I had some spotted gold $20 gold that got the stickers. You never know.
Looking for 108, not 801
Either you shook that rattler between pics, or that's a rotated die.
Successful BST transactions- Bfjohnson, Collectorcoins, 1peter223, Shrub68, Byers, Greencopper, Coinlieutenant, Coinhunter4, SurfinxHI, ProfLiz
The toning is not really very nice but on the other hand it may be an original coin. 1921 Morgan's typically do not develop nice toning.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP
The coin looks about as original as you’re going to see. However, I think it’s a good example of a coin being highly original looking, but not necessarily also highly desirable.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I never want to disappoint anyone with an opinion about their coins as I have had coins I thought were ok, just to have gotten a reality check when presented to this forum. @PTVETTER, if you like what you purchased, than that’s all that matters. Own it and be happy with your purchase.
Zack
Not for me, pass.
It’s almost an antique. The holder, that is.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
People seem to think that anything in a rattler deserves a premium. I for one do not subscribe to that belief. This would not be a coin for me.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
I think there is good luster hiding under that "toning".
From the photo, though, I would pass as it doesn't look like one I would want.
Hopefully you find the right buyer who does like it
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
The price would determine whether it's a yea or nay for me.
Dave
Agree with the other comments; but the OP is pretty savvy, so I’m assuming there’s something special about the coin that I’m missing….
Unlike a lot of the people here, I kinda like the toning, it looks like it'd be better in-hand. Nice acquisition though!
"Another day, another Collectors Universe forum scrolling session."
- Someone, probably
I wouldn’t make such an assumption, no matter who the buyer was. We have no idea whether the coin was bought cheaply or at a premium.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I don’t know either, but I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt, and I’m expressing my opinion that he probably knew what he was doing.
The point I was trying to make is that I wouldn’t assume that there’s something special about the coin that you’re missing. Sure, that could be the case, but he might have just as easily bought the coin as an ordinary example that was priced right.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Ah, gotcha, that makes sense 👍