Home U.S. Coin Forum

Keep an eye out on the new Anacs slabs - Anacs to PCGS upgrade

U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,876 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited April 7, 2026 6:48PM in U.S. Coin Forum

While doing a search of rainbow toners on eBay, I came across a sold listing that looked familiar.
This PCGS MS 66, which sold for almost $5,300 a few days ago was auctioned on GC back in October 2025. Back then it was an Anacs MS 64 and brought slightly under $800. A nice upgrade- grade and dollar wise! And a reminder to keep an eye out on all sorts of slabs, including the new yellow Anacs holders, as they can have some nice coins.


Comments

  • kruegerkrueger Posts: 944 ✭✭✭✭

    Anacs use to almost always cross.
    Only lower grades now.
    High grades long shot now
    My last anacs 67 a real clean fml coin got a DNC. What awaist of money and especially time.

  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,927 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Which grade do you think was more accurate in your opinion?

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 536 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is it just me but is that ANACS slabbed coin the same one as the GC 1939057? Seems the toning is similar…but not the same coin. The ANACS slab has an untoned spot over the star at the 4 o’clock position while the GC image shows a similar untoned spot at 3 o’clock position over the M. Just my opinion but they look like different coins to me. Cheers, karl

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @safari_dude said:
    Is it just me but is that ANACS slabbed coin the same one as the GC 1939057? Seems the toning is similar…but not the same coin. The ANACS slab has an untoned spot over the star at the 4 o’clock position while the GC image shows a similar untoned spot at 3 o’clock position over the M. Just my opinion but they look like different coins to me. Cheers, karl

    I think that what you see is a reflection of light when at the GC studio.

    Now take a look at the TrueView photo at 3 or 4 o'clock.

  • DesertCoinDesertCoin Posts: 363 ✭✭✭

    The TrueView didn’t hurt that one bit

    “Land of the free because of the brave”
    “Saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone”
    In Deo solo confidimus
    ΙΧΘΥΣ
    ΙϹ ΧϹ ΝΙΚΑ (ΙΗΣΟΥΣ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ ΝΙΚΑ)


    Member since 2026
    Successful BST transactions with: Ted 1, JWP, bigjpst, Vetter, nickelsciolist,
  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,876 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rc5280 said:

    @safari_dude said:
    Is it just me but is that ANACS slabbed coin the same one as the GC 1939057? Seems the toning is similar…but not the same coin. The ANACS slab has an untoned spot over the star at the 4 o’clock position while the GC image shows a similar untoned spot at 3 o’clock position over the M. Just my opinion but they look like different coins to me. Cheers, karl

    I think that what you see is a reflection of light when at the GC studio.

    Now take a look at the TrueView photo at 3 or 4 o'clock.

    Yes it’s the same coin and you can line up some of the hits/marks. The photos are done differently so that makes it a bit harder to match up.

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 2,054 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks closer to 64 as a technical grade. Not sure I like market grading since some folks might think it's a 66 with a toning bump.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,977 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pretty coin but not a gem imo. All the color does is distract from the marks consistent with choice uncirculated designation which is what ANACS gave it.

    The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • TallahasseeCoinClubTallahasseeCoinClub Posts: 316 ✭✭✭✭

    Judging by only those photos, both services got it wrong. :D

    Official PCGS account of:

    www.TallahasseeCoinClub.com

  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 471 ✭✭✭✭

    @U1chicago said:

    @TomB said:
    Which grade do you think was more accurate in your opinion?

    From what I see, Anacs graded it without taking color into consideration (not market graded) while PCGS had a color bump.
    I would split the difference and call it a 65. There is a cheek hit that looks significant enough to prevent a 66 in my view.

    I don't think it's hit I think it's just breaks in the toning.

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,594 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @oldabeintx said:
    Um, add $5,000 for pretty toning? I have to bite my tongue. To each his own, yay.

    Yeah common date Morgan going for over $5K all due to some environmental damage. It is a crazy world that we live in. my first thoughts is it needs a bath and my second thought is I wouldn't drop more than $250 on that coin even if it really was a 66. RGDS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • ProofmorganProofmorgan Posts: 940 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's very common for these toned pieces to get grading bumps on resubmissions. I've sold similar coins in 65 CAC and saw them pop up in 67+ CAC later on. The technical grade is not as large of a factor in these coins. I've also seen similar cheek contact in white coins graded 65-66, so I'm not that surprised.

    Collector of Original Early Gold with beginnings in Proof Morgan collecting.
  • bramn8rbramn8r Posts: 959 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've had ANACS slabbed coins go both ways in crossing over to PCGS, one up and one or more down. Hard for me to figure it out. That's a nice Morgan though.

  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,458 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree and buy coins from all holders and even raw. I remember cracking a DCAM 1951 Franklin from SEGS, dipping it, and having it come back the same grade from PCGS before selling it for a 10x-15x profit.

  • KOYNGUYKOYNGUY Posts: 203 ✭✭✭✭
    edited May 11, 2026 6:59PM

    So, If PCGS grades by the market, Why did they not grade the coin 68+? That apparently is the market value. 64'S are $100, 66'S are $260, 68'S are north of $4000. Do dollar buyers have a better sense of value for color on a coin than the services?. I grade the coin on what I think it would dip out as, and let the buyers bid up the price based on pretty. Trying to to nail the moving toning target is a fool's errand, and neither service hit the value level. I'd suggest both submitters left money on the table with the help of the services. Why don't we agree to have services grade the coin sans color and let the market figure it out? It appears to be what ANACS did.

    62 yrs in Coins, 42 yrs Certifying/Grading, CoinWorld's Most Influential People In Numismatics, 1960-2020. 30 consecutive yrs teaching ANA Summer seminar, Numismatic Ambassador award, 1998 Doctorate in Numismatics, Glenn Smedley Award, ANA Governor 2009/2011, Author/ Host of ANA's best selling video's, courses on grading & counterfeit detection. Taught over 1,100 paying students, Secret service agents, San Diego to Boston, Anchorage to Miami, including 2 coin cruise lecturer. many Free presentations. NLG book and video awards. ANA photographer, SEM operator, ASA Appraiser, Contributor to Redbook, Numismatist, Coin World, Numismatic News, ANA Grading Guides, 40,000 Volume Library, Founder ANAAB, ICG, 1995 ANA collector services appraisal/conservation, First full service Ancient coin grading service. Navy 75-77, WIU 77-81, Dealer1981-1984, ANA 1984-1998, 60 year Collector U.S./ 50 Year Ancient coins. ANA Advisory Committee. Life member ANA, ANS. Semi-retired grader in Denver area

  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Once again, I find myself agreeing with Ricko.... I really do not understand even liking this kind of tarnish, much less paying thousands of dollars for it.

    It's a free market (more or less), so whatever floats your boat; but I cannot begin to see it.

  • U1chicagoU1chicago Posts: 6,876 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 11, 2026 7:04PM

    @KOYNGUY said:
    So, If PCGS grades by the market, Why did they not grade the coin 68+? That apparently is the market value. 64'S are $100, 66'S are $260, 68'S are north of $4000. Do dollar buyers have a better sense of value for color on a coin than the services?. I grade the coin on what I think it would dip out as, and let the buyers bid up the price based on pretty. Trying to to nail the moving toning target is a fool's errand, and neither service hit the value level. I'd suggest both submitters left money on the table with the help of the services. Why don't we agree to have services grade the coin sans color and let the market figure it out? It appears to be what ANACS did.

    As someone who collects toned Morgans, I have believed what you say for a while now. No coin should be market graded up for color. The toning premium still goes on top of the grade. So a technical 64 that is market graded to a 66 can sell for 68 pricing just like was seen in this example.

  • The_Dinosaur_ManThe_Dinosaur_Man Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think ANACS had it right calling it a 64. The color is really nice, but it doesn't undo surface marks.

    Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
    Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
    https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,511 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 11, 2026 7:39PM

    @124Spider said:
    Once again, I find myself agreeing with Ricko.... I really do not understand even liking this kind of tarnish, much less paying thousands of dollars for it.

    It's a free market (more or less), so whatever floats your boat; but I cannot begin to see it.

    You can’t understand how someone could see beauty where you don’t and be willing to pay for it, whatever it’s worth to them? That is what’s taking place in situations such as this.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • 124Spider124Spider Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited May 12, 2026 9:23PM

    @MFeld said:

    @124Spider said:
    Once again, I find myself agreeing with Ricko.... I really do not understand even liking this kind of tarnish, much less paying thousands of dollars for it.

    It's a free market (more or less), so whatever floats your boat; but I cannot begin to see it.

    You can’t understand how someone could see beauty where you don’t and be willing to pay for it, whatever it’s worth to them? That is what’s taking place in situations such as this.

    Of course I understand that people can "see beauty" where I cannot. I was merely saying that I cannot see that beauty (as you would realize if you re-read what I wrote). I don't see how some tarnish can make a coin "worth" many times what the same coin without the tarnish would be worth.

    YMMV, apparently.

  • TorinoCobra71TorinoCobra71 Posts: 8,092 ✭✭✭

    @blitzdude said:

    @oldabeintx said:
    Um, add $5,000 for pretty toning? I have to bite my tongue. To each his own, yay.

    Yeah common date Morgan going for over $5K all due to some environmental damage. It is a crazy world that we live in. my first thoughts is it needs a bath and my second thought is I wouldn't drop more than $250 on that coin even if it really was a 66. RGDS!

    Seems that the TONER TAX gets CRAZY STUPID sometimes......

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file