Home U.S. Coin Forum

I think I found one of interest, hopefully

This is 2007 P Washington Dollar Coin.

The first sets pictures are 3 Washington coins side by side to show the comparison.

The next sets are the Washington coin under magnification next to 2007 John Adams P in better condition on the edge for comparison.




Comments

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 31,084 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Why does the camptown race song come to mind?

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 1,161 ✭✭✭✭✭

    OP, If you found the coins to be interesting, I'm happy for you.

    Keep engaged with the hobby if you enjoy it.

    Sometimes it's a good way to escape the rigors & stressors of everyday life.

  • CregCreg Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Steve, you don’t know what you like—figure that out. The error thing is gonna get old for you. You’d get far more respect if you posted photos of adding cents to a Whitman folder. Coin grubbing—it’s not a good look. No one who continues to search for errors stays long.

  • TPringTPring Posts: 316 ✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 12:27PM

    The difference in your quarters is likely die deterioration -- As dies age [and are polished] the devices [numbers, letters, etc.] change the way the coin appears.

    If you truly want to learn about errors on coins then visit this site. It is geared towards Lincoln cents, and it will give you a start of what to look for on coins. I would also recommend using a 10X loupe for searching instead of a USB microscope.

    Just remember...the advice you receive on the site is worth every bit of what you paid for it.

  • MasonGMasonG Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you start from the position that every coin you examine should look exactly like every other coin of the same date/mint, you'll find "errors" everywhere.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 12:40PM

    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    "Compassionate people are geniuses in the art of living, more necessary to the dignity, security, and joy of humanity than the discoverers of knowledge."

    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • CregCreg Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 13, 2026 12:45PM

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    He’s holding the coins with his fingertips and posting photos of screenshots.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,893 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Creg said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    He’s holding the coins with his fingertips and posting photos of screenshots.

    Are the pictures not closeup pictures of the coin's edge lettering?

    "Compassionate people are geniuses in the art of living, more necessary to the dignity, security, and joy of humanity than the discoverers of knowledge."

    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,219 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:

    @Creg said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    He’s holding the coins with his fingertips and posting photos of screenshots.

    Are the pictures not closeup pictures of the coin's edge lettering?

    Speaking of the edges, you can't have MD on the edge lettering of a business strike dollar coin.

  • CregCreg Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mr1931S said:

    @Creg said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    He’s holding the coins with his fingertips and posting photos of screenshots.

    Are the pictures not closeup pictures of the coin's edge lettering?

    Don’t encourage him to hold coins that way. Are you a greenhorn too?

  • @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,046 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nothing worth bothering with. Dollar coins worth a dollar each.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • @oldglorycoins said:
    HERE WE GO AGAIN!!!!

    You’re not required to read what I put in this forum. It obviously bothers you, so why are you chiming in ? Keep the peace

  • @Creg said:
    Steve, you don’t know what you like—figure that out. The error thing is gonna get old for you. You’d get far more respect if you posted photos of adding cents to a Whitman folder. Coin grubbing—it’s not a good look. No one who continues to search for errors stays long.

    Thank you for your advice. I haven’t been on here very long and I trying to learn. So coin grubbing is what I’m doing?

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,156 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

    None of what appeared in your Google search results is the same as “strike doubling” or “die deterioration doubling”, both of which don’t usually result in any extra value.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

  • @JBK said:
    Maybe you could start by telling people exactly what it is you think you found. 😐

    I’ll start doing that, thank you.

  • oldglorycoinsoldglorycoins Posts: 199 ✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @Creg said:
    Steve, you don’t know what you like—figure that out. The error thing is gonna get old for you. You’d get far more respect if you posted photos of adding cents to a Whitman folder. Coin grubbing—it’s not a good look. No one who continues to search for errors stays long.

    Thank you for your advice. I haven’t been on here very long and I trying to learn. So coin grubbing is what I’m doing?

    Yes, Your looking though the same jar of pocket change over and over again. Please take those coins and spend them on real errors from a coin show or something. For the sake of this forum please stop posting 'errors'.
    P.S. It just makes you look like you have no knowledge whatsoever about coins.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

    You didn't Google either of the terms I gave you. I think I'm going to stop trying. Good luck to you.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    If you had googled what I told you, you'd see that you have what is known as "strike doubling", "machine doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". It is NOT a doubled die. I told you what it was and what to Google. We can't help people who don't want to be helped.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • CregCreg Posts: 1,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    Thank you for your advice. I haven’t been on here very long and I trying to learn. So coin grubbing is what I’m doing?

    Yes, I was thinking of the drudgery of digging with vague purpose.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,156 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    It’s not a doubled die error. And, as has already been posted by more than one respondent, it appears to be rather common machine/mechanical/strike/die deterioration doubling of no extra value.. See this site to help learn the differences: https://doubleddie.com/144801.html

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    I had to open the window and let some of the wrong out.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    I had to open the window and let some of the wrong out.

    Great. It drifted in through my open window.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • JBKJBK Posts: 17,219 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    A doubled die is separate from struck twice.

    Edge lettering on business strike dollar coins is not struck - it is "rolled" into the edge. There is no chance for a doubled die edge lettering.

    Dollar coins that have gone through the edge lettering machine twice have a very different look.

    One of your coins has very deep lettering, which will appear thicker than the lighter edge lettering.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,156 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan White said:

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    Maybe Mr. Weinberg would be willing to give an opinion on whether the OP's Dollar would be considered an error among collectors who enjoy looking for errors?

    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    I had to open the window and let some of the wrong out.

    Great. It drifted in through my open window.

    Surely, it must be a coincidence that I’ve been hearing a lot of windows being slammed shut in my neighborhood for the past few minutes.😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

    You didn't Google either of the terms I gave you. I think I'm going to stop trying. Good luck to you.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 38,447 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JBK said:

    @PeacockSteve said:
    It looks like a double die error except it’s on the edge of the coin. Is it just me or can anyone else see how the letters look doubled? Not 1955 C doubled or 1969S doubled. Several letters look double the size they are supposed to be. On some of the letters, I see where it was struck a 2nd time but slightly offset. If I’m wrong then I’m wrong, that’s fine.

    A doubled die is separate from struck twice.

    Edge lettering on business strike dollar coins is not struck - it is "rolled" into the edge. There is no chance for a doubled die edge lettering.

    Dollar coins that have gone through the edge lettering machine twice have a very different look.

    One of your coins has very deep lettering, which will appear thicker than the lighter edge lettering.

    the machine that imparts the edge lettering on these is called a castaing machine. i'm not sure how the lettering is made on the plate the coin is rolled on.

    there is no doubling on that edge lettering

    as mentioned the lettering can be different sizes due to different pressures in the castaing machine. you'll notice the bigger lettering is also deeper. i've personally found faint lettering and it is definitely smaller - all due to the pressure.

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

    You didn't Google either of the terms I gave you. I think I'm going to stop trying. Good luck to you.

    Better late than never

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 8,112 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So glad I don’t have this obsession :#

    Seated Half Society member #38

    "She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
    running like a water color in the rain...."
  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 4,114 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @Creg said:
    Steve, you don’t know what you like—figure that out. The error thing is gonna get old for you. You’d get far more respect if you posted photos of adding cents to a Whitman folder. Coin grubbing—it’s not a good look. No one who continues to search for errors stays long.

    Thank you for your advice. I haven’t been on here very long and I trying to learn. So coin grubbing is what I’m doing?

  • RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭✭

    Please, while you're at it, Google "insanity"

    Appreciated,
    Red R.

  • @jmlanzaf said:

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

    You didn't Google either of the terms I gave you. I think I'm going to stop trying. Good luck to you.

    I googled before you mentioned it.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,036 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @PeacockSteve said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    @jmlanzaf said:
    It looks like "strike doubling" or "die deterioration doubling". Google those terms and you'll see what I mean. Very common, no added value.

    I googled it and this is what it pulled up.

    You didn't Google either of the terms I gave you. I think I'm going to stop trying. Good luck to you.

    I googled before you mentioned it.

    And then you didn't Google what I told you it was and continued to suggest it was a doubled die.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,893 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Creg said:

    @mr1931S said:

    @Creg said:

    @mr1931S said:
    Looks like machine doubling (or strike doubling) to me. Nice close-up pictures though so OP can't be accused of not providing good enough pictures. :)

    He’s holding the coins with his fingertips and posting photos of screenshots.

    Are the pictures not closeup pictures of the coin's edge lettering?

    Don’t encourage him to hold coins that way. Are you a greenhorn too?

    I don't believe I did encourage him to hold coins that way. To answer your question despite your failure to answer mine, no, I'm not a greenhorn.

    "Compassionate people are geniuses in the art of living, more necessary to the dignity, security, and joy of humanity than the discoverers of knowledge."

    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 4,114 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Creg said:
    Don’t encourage him to hold coins that way. Are you a greenhorn too?

  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,893 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 14, 2026 7:36AM

    delete-wrong thread

    "Compassionate people are geniuses in the art of living, more necessary to the dignity, security, and joy of humanity than the discoverers of knowledge."

    Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file