Home U.S. Coin Forum

1952 Proof Cent. Possible Cameo?

SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

Your thoughts please.


Comments

  • GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭✭

    Judging from the pics, I'd say low odds... the shoulder looks a bit light on the obverse. Looks like a nice coin though...I love the pre-zinc proof Lincolns.

    imageimage

  • Old_CollectorOld_Collector Posts: 838 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @GaCoinGuy said:
    Judging from the pics, I'd say low odds... the shoulder looks a bit light on the obverse. Looks like a nice coin though...I love the pre-zinc proof Lincolns.

    Agreed, but those are very low res pictures, the obverse is around 350x350 px.

  • World67World67 Posts: 13,088 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think no.

  • WaterSportWaterSport Posts: 7,030 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I hope it is. Keep us posted.
    WS

    Proud recipient of the coveted PCGS Forum "You Suck" Award Thursday July 19, 2007 11:33 PM and December 30th, 2011 at 8:50 PM.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    In the pictures, no. But those are horrible pictures

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I will likely receive the proof set this cent is located in next week. Keeping my fingers crossed that the cent will show fully frosted devices and deeply mirrored fields (making it a candidate for submission to our host).

    The hunt continues for raw Cameo 1952, 1954, 1955 and 1958 cents. :)

  • SollaSollewSollaSollew Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Perhaps.
    Decent chance.

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 12,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would absolutely defer to your judgment, as you are an expert in this field.
    Chances are, if you took a shot based on what you saw, there’s a pretty good likelihood it’s there, or very close.

    Successful BST transactions with 177 members. breakdown, scotty1419, mattniss, bigjpst, onlyroosies, Manorcourtman, guitarwes, Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • humanssuckhumanssuck Posts: 657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No due to the shoulder and bottom portions of Lincoln. But...hard to tell with that quality of picture.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Last year the 1951 cent in this proof set (the photo of the obverse of the cent hinted at frosted devices):


    ended up grading PF66CAM

    Hopefully lightning will strike twice.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Update.

    The proof set containing the 1952 cent arrived today. The cent is gorgeous and IMO warrants a Cameo designation.

    I will take photos of the cent later today and post them.

    As added bonus is the fact that all 5 coins are pristine (PF66 and better), plus the quarter is a Superbird variety.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cell phone photos attached. Some light haze is present that is a negative.


  • fiftysevenerfiftysevener Posts: 943 ✭✭✭✭

    These are tough to find with nice contrast. Because very little polishing was done in those years, heavily contrasted examples are very hard to come by.

  • cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,015 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Be sure to check for re-engraved tailfeathers on that Superbird!

    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • CameonutCameonut Posts: 7,425 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I dunno Kevin. Has an even shot at PCGS - better odds at NGC in my experience. Should be interesting as '52 is a really tough year for all cameos.

    “In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson

    My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The quarter does not have re-engraved tale feathers.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Photos of the cent after the haze was removed.


  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 1,206 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    Photos of the cent after the haze was removed.

    Looking good!

    Please share your method & product in removing the haze on that Cent?

    I have a '53 Proof set that I would like to treat/dip.

    Thanks

  • humanssuckhumanssuck Posts: 657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    Photos of the cent after the haze was removed.


    From those pictures, I'd say you have a good shot at it. Good luck!

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow that coin really brightened up.
    What's your secret?

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP

  • EbeneezerEbeneezer Posts: 390 ✭✭✭

    Possibly. Going from the images, the obverse might keep it from cameo. The reverse I'd call it so.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I removed the light haze using diluted MS70.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,867 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1952 cent has been sent to our host to be graded.

    I will post the grade results and TruView photo.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file