Home Precious Metals

Smelters likely took a major bath Friday's silver plunge...........

Unless they hedged their inventory smelters likely took a major bath Friday

Back of the envelope numbers...........

Lets say they have a gross margin of 6% and a net of 3% then if they were in fact sitting with 4-6 weeks of inventory waiting to smelt then losses from inventory write down from Thur. P.M. close would just about wipe out a years profit.

(5 weeks of un-hedged inventory would be about 10% of years sales written down 30%= 3% of years total sales just about equaling that 3% net margin for the year.

All of this is using a fixed point in time and an unknown average cost of inventory.....Regardless a big change in value of that 5 weeks of inventory.

I expect we will see a major widening of everyones posted bid/asked prices come Monday.......Smelters, B&Ms etc.

If you did not like a 3% under/over spot price for ASEs be prepared for a move to a much higher spread...........

«13

Comments

  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 440 ✭✭✭✭

    Pigs get fat, Hogs get slaughtered.

  • CatbertCatbert Posts: 8,149 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Seated Half Society member #38

    "She comes out of the sun in a silk dress,
    running like a water color in the rain...."
  • silverpopsilverpop Posts: 6,899 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The metal market is a gamble, plain and simple. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose

    silver coin sale at link below
    https://photos.app.goo.gl/N1s4aR1Gex59y26c7

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 31, 2026 7:23AM

    Your calculations are meaningless. Not that I don't love to see math.

    Smelters all hedge. The bigger you're holding, the easier it is to hedge.

    And if they WERENT hedging, you need to include the huge runup in the "4-6 weeks" prior. In case you didn't know, hedging prevents profiting on increases as well a preventing losses on decreases.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • CryptoCrypto Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭✭✭

    As always in investing people take the stairs up but the elevator down. What’s crazy is at these levels a 6 or 700 dollar swing quickly multiples at scale and will be tough for small businesses. People wonder why they we Hesitant to buy 90% or anything near Spot

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 31, 2026 7:25AM

    It will go back up again. I do see it going up and down. Timing is everything. I think its going to hit $150 eventually.
    Now is the time to buy.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan13 said:
    It will go back up again. I do see it going up and down. Timing is everything. I think its going to hit $150 eventually.

    And if you're wrong?

    A 30% drop in a day isn't normal "up and down". And it was an orderly 30%, but a flash crash.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan13 said:
    It will go back up again. I do see it going up and down. Timing is everything. I think its going to hit $150 eventually.

    And if you're wrong?

    A 30% drop in a day isn't normal "up and down". And it was an orderly 30%, but a flash crash.

    If im wrong it wouldn't be the first time. I think the market is flooded right now but time will catch up. Its a cheaper buy then gold thats for sure. Its something the common man can invest in.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP

  • humanssuckhumanssuck Posts: 657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Most smelters do a majority of their volume from long term contracts from mining companies, so their spot volume is a minority of their business and likely easily managed with hedging.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 25,085 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It's still too high. The tulips are dying.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • pcgscacgoldpcgscacgold Posts: 3,733 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Let's see what the premiums are now. I have not seen dealers lowering their prices so that means premiums have increased considerably.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pcgscacgold said:
    Let's see what the premiums are now. I have not seen dealers lowering their prices so that means premiums have increased considerably.

    Dealers here lowered their prices

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • RaptormaniacsRaptormaniacs Posts: 160 ✭✭✭

    @291fifth said:
    It's still too high. The tulips are dying.

    I think the tulips just need some water. They haven’t even bloomed…

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2manycoins2fewfunds said:
    Unless they hedged their inventory smelters likely took a major bath Friday

    Back of the envelope numbers...........

    Lets say they have a gross margin of 6% and a net of 3% then if they were in fact sitting with 4-6 weeks of inventory waiting to smelt then losses from inventory write down from Thur. P.M. close would just about wipe out a years profit.

    (5 weeks of un-hedged inventory would be about 10% of years sales written down 30%= 3% of years total sales just about equaling that 3% net margin for the year.

    All of this is using a fixed point in time and an unknown average cost of inventory.....Regardless a big change in value of that 5 weeks of inventory.

    I expect we will see a major widening of everyones posted bid/asked prices come Monday.......Smelters, B&Ms etc.

    If you did not like a 3% under/over spot price for ASEs be prepared for a move to a much higher spread...........

    Are you equating smelters with refiners? I assume a refiner melts his recovered PMs and recasts into bars.

    theknowitalltroll;
  • johnjohn10johnjohn10 Posts: 106 ✭✭✭

    I think another issue is that we are all assuming everyone in the food chain honors all the back-to-back contracts they have. Some weak players will default and then you will see a domino effect.

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Your calculations are meaningless. Not that I don't love to see math.

    Smelters all hedge. The bigger you're holding, the easier it is to hedge.

    And if they WERENT hedging, you need to include the huge runup in the "4-6 weeks" prior. In case you didn't know, hedging prevents profiting on increases as well a preventing losses on decreases.

    They don't actually own the metal do they? If you send it in it's yours until it's processed. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    theknowitalltroll;
  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you bought metal or paper on Thursday you likely took it in the shorts. Hope it eventually recovers.

    theknowitalltroll;
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,962 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Anyone holding feels like they took a bath. On the other hand: I believe many of us fully expected a correction.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 31, 2026 9:10AM

    @BAJJERFAN said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Your calculations are meaningless. Not that I don't love to see math.

    Smelters all hedge. The bigger you're holding, the easier it is to hedge.

    And if they WERENT hedging, you need to include the huge runup in the "4-6 weeks" prior. In case you didn't know, hedging prevents profiting on increases as well a preventing losses on decreases.

    They don't actually own the metal do they? If you send it in it's yours until it's processed. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    I think that's true of the actual smelters. I take his comment to be including the wholesalers who actually own it and send it in. Some operations may own it. I don't know. But the bottom line is that none of those big entities are likely to be affected because they hedge. The ones who may be hurt are the LCS

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan13 said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @Morgan13 said:
    It will go back up again. I do see it going up and down. Timing is everything. I think its going to hit $150 eventually.

    And if you're wrong?

    A 30% drop in a day isn't normal "up and down". And it was an orderly 30%, but a flash crash.

    If im wrong it wouldn't be the first time. I think the market is flooded right now but time will catch up. Its a cheaper buy then gold thats for sure. Its something the common man can invest in.

    I don't know which way it's going. I don't even really care. But I'm a little worried about the number of people shrugging off Friday. That kind of move is rare.

    Just because people will continue to buy it doesn't mean the price has to go up.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • SollaSollewSollaSollew Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:
    Here’s a link to the Precious Metals forum, where such discussions belong:

    https://forums.collectors.com/categories/precious-metals

    :'(

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @BAJJERFAN said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Your calculations are meaningless. Not that I don't love to see math.

    Smelters all hedge. The bigger you're holding, the easier it is to hedge.

    And if they WERENT hedging, you need to include the huge runup in the "4-6 weeks" prior. In case you didn't know, hedging prevents profiting on increases as well a preventing losses on decreases.

    They don't actually own the metal do they? If you send it in it's yours until it's processed. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    I think that's true of the actual smelters. I take his comment to be including the wholesalers who actually own it and send it in. Some operations may own it. I don't know. But the bottom line is that none of those big entities are likely to be affected because they hedge. The ones who may be hurt are the LCS

    And who's going to be hurt if the price rises again? The entire financial market is being rearranged. Does it matter to note that this has profound implications to coins, the coin hobby, and even the day to day operations of most numismatic enterprises?

    No matter because only time will tell.

    It is metal in short supply not sellers of silver.

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sentiment changes first!

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cladking said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @BAJJERFAN said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Your calculations are meaningless. Not that I don't love to see math.

    Smelters all hedge. The bigger you're holding, the easier it is to hedge.

    And if they WERENT hedging, you need to include the huge runup in the "4-6 weeks" prior. In case you didn't know, hedging prevents profiting on increases as well a preventing losses on decreases.

    They don't actually own the metal do they? If you send it in it's yours until it's processed. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    I think that's true of the actual smelters. I take his comment to be including the wholesalers who actually own it and send it in. Some operations may own it. I don't know. But the bottom line is that none of those big entities are likely to be affected because they hedge. The ones who may be hurt are the LCS

    And who's going to be hurt if the price rises again? The entire financial market is being rearranged. Does it matter to note that this has profound implications to coins, the coin hobby, and even the day to day operations of most numismatic enterprises?

    No matter because only time will tell.

    It is metal in short supply not sellers of silver.

    A year's worth in the warehouses isn't a shortage of material.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    >

    A year's worth in the warehouses isn't a shortage of material.

    I haven't caught up with this thread yet but I don't think this is at all true. And it's not true. The refineries are the pipeline and the origin of good bars but a year's backlog is insignificant compared to the structural demand. This demand will keep the refineries at full blast for years even if supply goes up and retail demand comes down.

    The very structure of the future will require more metal and silver will be among the largest affected in relation to its availability. The amount of silver needed to keep 9 billion people connected to the grid will grow.

    THIS is the missing silver. It has been consumed by low prices and apathy. The pipeline shrank and shrank until we were living hand to mouth from mine plus scrap to consumption. That's it! That's all the silver that exists except for above ground supply. It doesn't need to be converted to good delivery bars because there's far more in the pipeline than there was a year ago. But human nature makes this impossible.

    It's our silver going into it. Not just ours as coin collectors but ours in the sense most owners of silver own at least some coins. But also "ours" in the sense that it's our heritage as many many silver objects are of exquisite beauty and importance. Our coins are no less precious even if more abundant.

    If we don't make it through the next several years I hope you bought gold, ammo, bitcoin or something at some point. If we do make it through we will need more silver than we mine.

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Copilot needs in on this one-

    **“A year’s worth of warehouse metal isn’t a buffer — it’s a snapshot. What matters is flow, not stock. The refineries are the pipeline, and once the pipeline shrinks to mine‑plus‑scrap, you’re living hand‑to‑mouth whether the warehouses look full or not.

    Structural demand doesn’t care about warehouse optics. It cares about how much metal must move every single day to keep the world running. And with 9 billion people needing power, electronics, data, and connectivity, the draw on silver only goes one direction.

    The missing silver isn’t hiding. It was consumed — quietly, steadily — during decades of low prices and complacency. The pipeline shrank because nobody believed it mattered. Now it matters.

    And yes, it’s our silver going into the system. Not just as collectors, but as the inheritors of objects, coins, and artifacts that represent centuries of human craft. Above‑ground silver is finite, and most of it is already spoken for.

    If the next few years get rough, I hope people diversified. If we make it through cleanly, the world on the other side will still need more silver than we mine. That’s the part the bear case can’t explain away.”**

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Tom147 said:
    My understanding is that the smelters aren't establishing a price and doing a payout until the day that particular metal hits the melt pot. So the loss is on whoever sent the metal to the smelter.

    When did this start?

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @cladking said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @BAJJERFAN said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Your calculations are meaningless. Not that I don't love to see math.

    Smelters all hedge. The bigger you're holding, the easier it is to hedge.

    And if they WERENT hedging, you need to include the huge runup in the "4-6 weeks" prior. In case you didn't know, hedging prevents profiting on increases as well a preventing losses on decreases.

    They don't actually own the metal do they? If you send it in it's yours until it's processed. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    I think that's true of the actual smelters. I take his comment to be including the wholesalers who actually own it and send it in. Some operations may own it. I don't know. But the bottom line is that none of those big entities are likely to be affected because they hedge. The ones who may be hurt are the LCS

    And who's going to be hurt if the price rises again? The entire financial market is being rearranged. Does it matter to note that this has profound implications to coins, the coin hobby, and even the day to day operations of most numismatic enterprises?

    No matter because only time will tell.

    It is metal in short supply not sellers of silver.

    A year's worth in the warehouses isn't a shortage of material.

    I believe you are talking to an AI bot. RGDS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • MaywoodMaywood Posts: 3,915 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Lots of unfounded speculation in this thread like some of the posters have an inside pipeline into what’s happening. There’s also a lot of panic talk that’s not really based in any truth.

    Save the drama.

    "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety," --- Benjamin Franklin

  • PeakRaritiesPeakRarities Posts: 4,773 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Maywood said:
    Lots of unfounded speculation in this thread like some of the posters have an inside pipeline into what’s happening. There’s also a lot of panic talk that’s not really based in any truth.

    Save the drama.

    Speculation? On a precious metals thread? Say it ain’t so, I’ll believe it when I see it!…lol

    Jokes aside, I posted the actual emails that the refineries sent out and the rest of my comment were tangible observations of activity within the online community for trading and announcements, for the record.

    @cladking said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    >

    A year's worth in the warehouses isn't a shortage of material.

    I haven't caught up with this thread yet but I don't think this is at all true. And it's not true. The refineries are the pipeline and the origin of good bars.

    I could have phrased my comment that better, my mistake. To clarify, the interpretation that I meant to convey was that they had amassed a stockpile equivalent to a years worth of volume in previous years during regular market conditions, not that it would take them a year to process it moving forward.

    That part is really just hearsay, but the context makes a difference because the refineries have had to operate at capacity for max output to handle the volume. I don’t know the workflow details, but I imagine might have been dormant equipment, or conservative staffing before silver started running.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • SollaSollewSollaSollew Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Maywood said:
    Lots of unfounded speculation in this thread like some of the posters have an inside pipeline into what’s happening. There’s also a lot of panic talk that’s not really based in any truth.

    Save the drama.

    Admit it.
    You LIVE for the drama.
    (It's one reason why you opened this thread.)

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,588 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ELVIS1 said:
    It is rumored that Jamie Diamond orchestrated this pump and dump and Monday the Chinese will follow suit...
    But you didn't hear it from me. ;)

    https://silvertrade.com/news/precious-metals/silver-news/jp-morgan-sells-entire-200-m-oz-silver-short-position-flips-long-750-m-oz/

    theknowitalltroll;
  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 440 ✭✭✭✭

    @BAJJERFAN said:

    @ELVIS1 said:
    It is rumored that Jamie Diamond orchestrated this pump and dump and Monday the Chinese will follow suit...
    But you didn't hear it from me. ;)

    https://silvertrade.com/news/precious-metals/silver-news/jp-morgan-sells-entire-200-m-oz-silver-short-position-flips-long-750-m-oz/

    I said, you didn't hear it from me... :D

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 38,670 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BAJJERFAN said:

    @ELVIS1 said:
    It is rumored that Jamie Diamond orchestrated this pump and dump and Monday the Chinese will follow suit...
    But you didn't hear it from me. ;)

    https://silvertrade.com/news/precious-metals/silver-news/jp-morgan-sells-entire-200-m-oz-silver-short-position-flips-long-750-m-oz/

    futures contracts are 5,000 ounces. that's 40,000 contracts. open interest is about 150,000 contracts. generally there might be 40,000 contracts short between like 3 us banks, not 1 and don't forget there are banks long.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 31, 2026 7:30PM

    @cladking said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    >

    A year's worth in the warehouses isn't a shortage of material.

    I haven't caught up with this thread yet but I don't think this is at all true. And it's not true. The refineries are the pipeline and the origin of good bars but a year's backlog is insignificant compared to the structural demand. This demand will keep the refineries at full blast for years even if supply goes up and retail demand comes down.

    The very structure of the future will require more metal and silver will be among the largest affected in relation to its availability. The amount of silver needed to keep 9 billion people connected to the grid will grow.

    THIS is the missing silver. It has been consumed by low prices and apathy. The pipeline shrank and shrank until we were living hand to mouth from mine plus scrap to consumption. That's it! That's all the silver that exists except for above ground supply. It doesn't need to be converted to good delivery bars because there's far more in the pipeline than there was a year ago. But human nature makes this impossible.

    It's our silver going into it. Not just ours as coin collectors but ours in the sense most owners of silver own at least some coins. But also "ours" in the sense that it's our heritage as many many silver objects are of exquisite beauty and importance. Our coins are no less precious even if more abundant.

    If we don't make it through the next several years I hope you bought gold, ammo, bitcoin or something at some point. If we do make it through we will need more silver than we mine.

    No. Where is the shortage? Only on the refined end because of the backlog.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ELVIS1 said:
    It is rumored that Jamie Diamond orchestrated this pump and dump and Monday the Chinese will follow suit...
    But you didn't hear it from me. ;)

    You know it's false if you think China is orchestrating with Dimon. If China follows suit Sunday night, you will see 50 before you see 100.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 38,670 ✭✭✭✭✭

    kitco and futures open 6pm but this time of year, asia is online at 8pm our time

  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,565 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Who will buy me gutter? THKS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @blitzdude said:
    Who will buy me gutter? THKS!

    This should be on the BST

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    No. Where is the shortage? Only on the refined end because of the backlog.

    The backlog is tiny compared to the demand. The backlog is is a few month supply but the demand is a several year supply.

    This isn't Kansas anymore.

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
  • blitzdudeblitzdude Posts: 7,565 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 31, 2026 8:00PM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @blitzdude said:
    Who will buy me gutter? THKS!

    This should be on the BST

    SRRY, I thought I was in the PMs and not the US Coins. Carry on. THKS!

    Disclaimer, my recent spreadsheets have given me double vision. Forgive me for my error. RGDS!

    The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
    BOOMIN!™
    Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
    Retiring at 55, what day is today? :sunglasses:

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @cladking said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    No. Where is the shortage? Only on the refined end because of the backlog.

    The backlog is tiny compared to the demand. The backlog is is a few month supply but the demand is a several year supply.

    This isn't Kansas anymore.

    Please quote a source. Projected demand from the Silver Institute for 2026 is pretty much THE SAME as 2025 not "several years supply".

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • GoldFinger1969GoldFinger1969 Posts: 3,380 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    futures contracts are 5,000 ounces. that's 40,000 contracts. open interest is about 150,000 contracts. generally >there might be 40,000 contracts short between like 3 us banks, not 1 and don't forget there are banks long.

    NO banks are "speculating" in silver or PM's. The regulators would close them down and any CEO would be updating his or her resume on Word if that was the case.

    These click-bait sites are ridiculous. I saw one stating that a sell-side analyst who was bearish on silver implied his firm was short the metal. That's like saying if the JP Morgan brokerage analyst likes Tesla stock, the bank's capital account is long TSLA. Again, the CEO and lots of others would be out of jobs if this were the case.

    That article is a joke. It's one hypothetical after another:

    "...JP Morgan- long believed to the largest short of the gold & silver markets (allegedly at the behest of the US Gov’t) reportedly has closed its ENTIRE 200 Million oz naked short silver position, & flipped LONG 750 MILLION oz- THE LARGEST PHYSICAL SILVER STOCKPILE IN THE WORLD!"

    That guy flipped, that's for sure. :D

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 40,335 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @GoldFinger1969 said:

    @MsMorrisine said:
    futures contracts are 5,000 ounces. that's 40,000 contracts. open interest is about 150,000 contracts. generally >there might be 40,000 contracts short between like 3 us banks, not 1 and don't forget there are banks long.

    NO banks are "speculating" in silver or PM's. The regulators would close them down and any CEO would be updating his or her resume on Word if that was the case.

    These click-bait sites are ridiculous. I saw one stating that a sell-side analyst who was bearish on silver implied his firm was short the metal. That's like saying if the JP Morgan brokerage analyst likes Tesla stock, the bank's capital account is long TSLA. Again, the CEO and lots of others would be out of jobs if this were the case.

    That article is a joke. It's one hypothetical after another:

    "...JP Morgan- long believed to the largest short of the gold & silver markets (allegedly at the behest of the US Gov’t) reportedly has closed its ENTIRE 200 Million oz naked short silver position, & flipped LONG 750 MILLION oz- THE LARGEST PHYSICAL SILVER STOCKPILE IN THE WORLD!"

    That guy flipped, that's for sure. :D

    It's all of these sites that make me believe in a bubble. There are real reasons for bullishness. But it's reached the state that there is one desperate rationalization after another drawing in kettle who have never bought PMs before. There's even one guy claiming that a rare planetary alignment is bullish for silver.

    Was Friday a pullback or the start of a reversal? I don't know. However, the number of people who have absolutely dismissed an orderly 30% decline makes me lean toward reversal. Market turns are often marked by extreme bullishness or extreme bearishness.

    At the very least, a little caution is in order.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • cladkingcladking Posts: 29,829 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited February 1, 2026 6:35AM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @cladking said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    No. Where is the shortage? Only on the refined end because of the backlog.

    The backlog is tiny compared to the demand. The backlog is is a few month supply but the demand is a several year supply.

    This isn't Kansas anymore.

    Please quote a source. Projected demand from the Silver Institute for 2026 is pretty much THE SAME as 2025 not "several years supply".

    Mine supply has been sky high for a century and a half. Our capacity to refine silver is based on this but there is wiggle room to refine scrap and make many products including new ones every year. This wiggle room is gone because the capacity is stretched to make good delivery bars. Instead of filling orders for the mint they are producing 1000 OZt 999. They are backed up. But the buyers of these bars don't want all the new silver being produced but they want all of this plus.

    Nothing can get this silver to the buyers fast enough. Lower prices won't help increase the wiggle room but will actually decrease flow as refining becomes less profitable and capacity decreases.

    This is a structural and infrastructural change in demand g\for silver as it slows going into silverware and coins and increases going into products that contain silver and into the vaults of the manufacturers of silver.

    This move may not have been intentionally engineered because I know people who predicted it. But if it were it were it was most ill conceived because because even the short term effect is to cause lower supply and higher demand. Fear is such it could keep the price down briefly but they are still coming after our coins and all the above ground silver as they maintain and increase refining capacity.

    .
    Copilot suggests this is easier to understand-

    **“The Silver Institute’s annual projection doesn’t tell you anything about the bottleneck we’re in right now. It’s a calendar‑year estimate, not a measure of how fast metal must move through the pipeline to satisfy real‑time industrial demand.

    Mine supply has been high for 150 years — that’s exactly why refining capacity was built around a world where silver was abundant and cheap. That world is gone. The ‘wiggle room’ that used to absorb scrap, mint orders, and new product lines has been eaten up by the shift toward 1000‑oz bars.

    And the buyers of those bars don’t just want the new metal. They want the new metal plus whatever else can be pulled out of the system. That’s why nothing is getting to them fast enough. Lower prices don’t fix that — they make it worse by reducing refining margins and slowing throughput.

    This is a structural change, not a blip. Less silver is going into discretionary uses like silverware and coins, and more is going into products that consume it permanently and into the vaults of manufacturers who can’t risk being caught short.

    Whether this shift was engineered or simply the result of predictable pressures doesn’t matter. The effect is the same: lower effective supply, higher inelastic demand, and a scramble for above‑ground metal. They’re coming for everything — coins, scrap, heirlooms — because the system needs more silver than it mines.”**

    tempus fugit extra philosophiam.
Sign In or Register to comment.