Home U.S. Coin Forum

Stack’s Bowers to sell the Omega One Cent coins and 24k gold Lincoln cents

There are going to be 232 three-coin sets available, including a 24k gold Lincoln cent. Popcorn bucket ready for the auction in December.

https://stacksbowers.com/sbpressreleases/stacks-bowers-galleries-to-sell-the-very-last-omega-pennies-at-auction-including-the-24-karat-gold-penny-sold-on-behalf-of-the-united-states-mint/

«1

Comments

  • ScarsdaleCoinScarsdaleCoin Posts: 5,386 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It will be interesting to see what range these go for. Any guess? I’m thinking 25k each set?

    Jon Lerner - Scarsdale Coin - www.CoinHelp.com
  • Mr_ColomboMr_Colombo Posts: 77 ✭✭✭

    @ScarsdaleCoin Spot on! I'm assuming Stacks will have these graded and IMO the top pop sets will reach 20-25k. Will be interesting to see the grades with their respective auction hammer prices.

  • Clackamas1Clackamas1 Posts: 1,661 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ScarsdaleCoin said:
    It will be interesting to see what range these go for. Any guess? I’m thinking 25k each set?

    I think they will go for multiples of that.

  • keyman64keyman64 Posts: 15,598 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 18, 2025 6:56PM

    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    "If it's not fun, it's not worth it." - KeyMan64
    Looking for Top Pop Mercury Dime Varieties & High Grade Mercury Dime Toners. :smile:
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,369 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would guess higher than $25k each.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • P0CKETCHANGEP0CKETCHANGE Posts: 3,081 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @keyman64 said:
    I wonder how many of them will be noted with environmental damage by PCGS. The early release photos had already clearly shown finger prints.

    I’d put my money on “zero”, since fingerprints do not translate to an environmental details grade.

    Nothing is as expensive as free money.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 11,855 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @keyman64 said:
    I wonder how many of them will be noted with environmental damage by PCGS. The early release photos had already clearly shown finger prints. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins.

    I guess they learned their lesson.

  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,815 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll be the first to predict $100K+

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,837 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A lot more than I would be willing to pay if I were still actively buying.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The gold cent is intriguing.

    They won't sell for 100K avg but down the road maybe.

  • retirednowretirednow Posts: 632 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Can someone educate me ... does the mint own these sets now and thus the proceeds so back to the Mint?

    OMG ... My Mother was Right about Everything!
    I wake up with a Good Attitude Every Day. Then … Idiots Happen!

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DCW said:
    How did we go from 5 pennies to 232 three coin sets? :|

    I suspect StacksBowers talked with them about maximizing sales total. Didn't they auction a limited number of something a couple years ago?

  • ernie11ernie11 Posts: 2,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 8:21AM

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    I live here in Philly and I would've been glad to have brought over my white gloves and held those cents, had they asked me. :)

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So is the 232 to commemorate the first year the Philly Mint produced the penny, 1793?

  • @coastaljerseyguy said:
    So is the 232 to commemorate the first year the Philly Mint produced the penny, 1793?

    I believe it's to commemorate the 232 years the penny was minted.

  • cptbillycptbilly Posts: 33 ✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 11:07AM

    @davewesen said:

    @DCW said:
    How did we go from 5 pennies to 232 three coin sets? :|

    I suspect StacksBowers talked with them about maximizing sales total. Didn't they auction a limited number of something a couple years ago?

    Flowing Hair High Relief Gold Coins in 2024. The first coin included the cancelled dies and sold for $440K. The average selling price of 45 PR69 examples in the auction was $28K. Total sales of the 230 coins was $8,236,000. Someone who just had to have #230 of 230 -- a PF70 -- paid $90K !

  • MetroDMetroD Posts: 2,468 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @davewesen said:

    I suspect StacksBowers talked with them about maximizing sales total. Didn't they auction a limited number of something a couple years ago?


    Source: https://stacksbowers.com/sbpressreleases/stacks-bowers-galleries-to-sell-the-very-last-omega-pennies-at-auction-including-the-24-karat-gold-penny-sold-on-behalf-of-the-united-states-mint/

  • MrEurekaMrEureka Posts: 24,505 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Seems like 50-60K per set should be about right. Figuring any Lincoln with a mintage of 232 pieces has to be cheap at 10K, and the gold piece has to be worth at least double what the red ones will bring. I’m not playing because it seems like we’re going to be getting more and more of these fabricated rarities, and I don’t think that will help the market for the earlier issues. But at the right discount to my numbers, well, I suppose I’d have to jump in.

    Andy Lustig

    Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.

    Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @mbr33 said:

    @coastaljerseyguy said:
    So is the 232 to commemorate the first year the Philly Mint produced the penny, 1793?

    I believe it's to commemorate the 232 years the penny was minted.

    Got it, if you exclude the Fugio Cent as the first penny, which was minted in 1787.

  • HalfDimeHalfDime Posts: 649 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 10:43AM

    They should have done a regular run of gold without the Omega sign for the "poor" buyers.

    The mint is starting to produce Dan Carr mintage level coins.

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 7,308 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 12:32PM

    @MrEureka said:
    Seems like 50-60K per set should be about right. Figuring any Lincoln with a mintage of 232 pieces has to be cheap at 10K, and the gold piece has to be worth at least double what the red ones will bring. I’m not playing because it seems like we’re going to be getting more and more of these fabricated rarities, and I don’t think that will help the market for the earlier issues. But at the right discount to my numbers, well, I suppose I’d have to jump in.

    The gold flowing hairs with similar mintage brought pretty much $25k or more in PR69 & PR70. These cents will probably be MS67-MS69. I would like to think they would go less than $25k although there are 3 coins not 1 but the cent probably has a bigger collector base. Hmmmmm.

    Edited to add:
    Any speculation on the PCGS slabbing - will it be a 3-coin multi holder?

  • dcarrdcarr Posts: 9,510 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,765 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @HalfDime said:
    They should have done a regular run of gold without the Omega sign for the "poor" buyers.

    The mint is starting to produce Dan Carr mintage level coins.

    maybe they can make some regular gold proof ones to celebrate the countries 250th

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 36,989 ✭✭✭✭✭

    hmmmm... on a plain one, turn the copper to brass and we might have someone asking if it is gold

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,591 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ScarsdaleCoin said:
    It will be interesting to see what range these go for. Any guess? I’m thinking 25k each set?

    I think at least $400 K per set.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 5:16PM

    @dcarr said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 36,989 ✭✭✭✭✭

    gold in all 232?

    ~30k avg then 250k for the last with the cancelled dis

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 5:24PM

    @MsMorrisine said:
    gold in all 232?

    ~30k avg then 250k for the last with the cancelled dis

    Nope. Based on one canceled Gold FH die going for $440K, 3 canceled cent dies will surely go for more than $500K.

    Also, based on 230 Gold FH coins going for more than $30K on average for a single coin, albeit one with an ounce of gold, it is likely that each Lincoln 3 coin set will go for more than that. Likely $50K+.

    People here constantly commit the sin of looking at things like this through their personal lens when pontificating how much things like this will sell for, ignoring empirical evidence that doesn't line up with value as they see it.

    I'd never spend what these things are going to go for. But what they are going to go for is not a mystery, given the data set we have from a mere year ago, and then how those coins did in the secondary market.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 37,679 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @NJCoin said:

    @dcarr said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

    "Conserved" just means a dip before slabbing. That is a service TPGs provide

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • HalfDimeHalfDime Posts: 649 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2025 7:18PM

    @NJCoin said:
    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

    The last coin is whichever one the mint declares it to be. They may have to waffle the one with the fingerprints and use number two instead.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 11,855 ✭✭✭✭✭

    At least a San Francisco complete set will still be doable.

  • @ScarsdaleCoin said:
    It will be interesting to see what range these go for. Any guess? I’m thinking 25k each set?

    My guess:
    Lot 232 with the canceled dies: $1,000,000
    Lot # 1: $60,000
    MS70 Lots: $40 - 50K
    MS69 Lots: $18 - 25K

  • nagsnags Posts: 842 ✭✭✭✭

    Has it been confirmed as to whether they will be graded?

  • cinque1543cinque1543 Posts: 343 ✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2025 6:46AM

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press.

    I haven’t seen the press photos, but do we know that the person was holding one of the actual coins (as opposed to a prop)?

    Either way, you are correct. It sends the wrong message.

  • coinandcurrency242coinandcurrency242 Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭✭

    I am not a fan. What if they decide to start making pennies again in the future? Won't that hurt the value of these

    Positive BST as a seller: Namvet69, Lordmarcovan, Bigjpst, Soldi, mustanggt, CoinHoader, moursund, SufinxHi, al410, JWP

  • ProofCollectionProofCollection Posts: 7,308 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @dcarr said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

    "Conserved" just means a dip before slabbing. That is a service SOME TPGs provide

    There I fixed it.

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @NJCoin said:

    @dcarr said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

    But aren't these going to be the last 232 made? How could they have been made months ago?

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coastaljerseyguy said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @dcarr said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

    But aren't these going to be the last 232 made? How could they have been made months ago?

    Because they stopped making cents months ago. They are no longer being distributed to banks.

    What they did last week was nothing more than a photo op. And apparently did not even include the coins they are auctioning, given that they made a big deal about striking 5 in Philly, while the auction is of 232 struck in both Philly and Denver. Not to mention the fact that the video showed the coins being handled with bare hands, and getting fingerprints all over them.

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 3,385 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2025 8:20AM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @NJCoin said:

    @dcarr said:

    @keyman64 said:
    Edit: I guess environmental damage will not be designated by PCGS for the fingerprints clearly shown in early press. I wonder how many will slowly (or quickly) turn in holder to RB due to the oils in people's skin getting on the coins. How difficult is it to have someone at the mint with minimal numismatic knowledge anyway? Ugh

    .

    I expect that these would be "conserved" prior to placement in holders.
    I certainly would, because that will mitigate future finger-print toning.

    .

    And I will actually be shocked if those coins that were manhandled in Philly in front of the cameras last week are part of this 232, given that they are now offering Ps, Ds and gold, while all they made last week were a handful of Ps. The 232 were all likely made separately, months ago, and handled with the care something that is going to auctioned for mucho bucks deserves.

    If I'm right, while everything at auction will be 69 and 70 with no conservation, as someone paying up for those sets would expect, it will also mean none of them are actually the last coins made in that ceremony for the cameras last week, regardless of any official certification to the contrary.

    "Conserved" just means a dip before slabbing. That is a service TPGs provide

    Is that a service they provide for every newly minted coin, even when there is no damage, such as fingerprints? If not, that's not what we were talking about. And, if so, it's not really "conserving." It's just part of "slabbing."

    But thanks for jumping in, finding fault with anything and everything I post, and providing a valuable education.

  • HalfDimeHalfDime Posts: 649 ✭✭✭✭

    We can only guess, but it was not just a photo op done to get press for the mint, it was done to bring in more money for the casino they run. The mint seems to have a clever employee now that is coming up with ways to monetize coins for them, and this is one of them. Why let such an opportunity pass us by?

    If these are the only gold lincoln cents to be struck, they will be historically low as a type coin. They would end up number three in the history of the mint for mint state coins. If later gold lincolns are struck, they might diminish the value of these, although I doubt the mint won't consider it as a way for easy money.

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @nags said:
    Has it been confirmed as to whether they will be graded?

    Yes they will be graded by PCGS.

    CAC will *approve and **sticker the sets as well.

    *according to Stack's Bowers
    **(imo)

  • oldabeintxoldabeintx Posts: 2,570 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I’m a little surprised that these will be graded and sent to CAC prior to being offered to the public. In this rare instance I would think that many, especially non-collectors, would prefer the fancy boxed sets that the mint has used. Perhaps PCGS will prepare a special triple holder. I guess registry considerations (or $$) have driven this decision. I see no real value otherwise in going through the grading and stickering process prior to offering them. The aftermarket can certainly provide the grading and stickering service appealing to those who want same, and would provide more flexibility for consumers who would prefer other choices.

  • nagsnags Posts: 842 ✭✭✭✭

    Will make the auction more interesting if there are different combinations of grades among the lots, i.e. (70 70 70), (70 70 69) (70, 69, 70)...

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 836 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @nags said:
    Will make the auction more interesting if there are different combinations of grades among the lots, i.e. (70 70 70), (70 70 69) (70, 69, 70)...

    Agree, a matched set would be ideal if I were to go for a set.

    How about a 'stickered' set vs a non-stickered set?

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 36,989 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rc5280 said:
    CAC will *approve and **sticker the sets as well.

    Stack's has PMG

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:

    @Rc5280 said:
    CAC will *approve and **sticker the sets as well.

    Stack's has PMG

    But CAC (not CMG) was mentioned in their statement.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • fathomfathom Posts: 1,920 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Stickers? What is a sticker going to prove? They aren't throwing them into a bin or running them through a counting machine are they? Whatever.

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 836 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 20, 2025 11:09AM

    Stack's has CMQ and is "in house", and could convey a conflict of interest if involved?
    CMQ is not as influential as CAC at this time.

    As far as a motivation to include CAC to 'approve' the PCGS grades & quality of the coins?

    I'll defer you to Stack's, PCGS, and the USM for their reasoning to include CAC with this offering.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file