Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

As more non-collectors are gathering around to hoard/collect Lincoln cents, here is a chart

RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭✭

What would you add or take away from this basic chart? Cents to look out for and to place aside.

Comments

  • Options
    dcarrdcarr Posts: 10,060 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Also 1960 [P] (proof) large date over small date, and small date over large date.

    I think the only known 1974-D aluminum cent was confiscated.
    1974 [P] aluminum cents do exist in the marketplace (and are quite valuable).

  • Options
    hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,614 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Make sure to add that one image of strike vs. hub doubling, or else you could be creating more "change checker" types.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • Options
    Coins3675Coins3675 Posts: 1,082 ✭✭✭✭

    That is a good chart.

    Successful Transactions With: JWP, DBSTrader2, greencopper, bretsan, ajaan

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 32,409 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Theres the chart, make good use of it

  • Options
    WCCWCC Posts: 3,240 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 17, 2025 3:15PM

    It depends upon someone's assumptions and their intended holding period. To start, I'm assuming anyone intending to set aside any of the above list with a substantial premium expects to pay market price, unless cherry-picking a variety or an under graded coin.

    Using my assumptions, I wouldn't set aside any for "investment" or financial speculation, particularly in the quality I infer from the OP. Totally different for anyone who wants to collect it. That's a recreational consumption expense.

  • Options
    jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 4,059 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coins3675 said:
    That is a good chart.

    That is a bad chart. There is no chance of finding almost everything listed on that chart. Or a negative chance, if you consider that it's more likely to find a counterfeit than a real example.

    Try generating a list limited to the last 40 years, excluding all of the proofs that won't be found in circulation anyway, and all of the marketing hype varieties (floating head?) that nobody will pay for.

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jonathanb said:

    @Coins3675 said:
    That is a good chart.

    That is a bad chart. There is no chance of finding almost everything listed on that chart. Or a negative chance, if you consider that it's more likely to find a counterfeit than a real example.

    Try generating a list limited to the last 40 years, excluding all of the proofs that won't be found in circulation anyway, and all of the marketing hype varieties (floating head?) that nobody will pay for.

    I will have to learn to live with your disappointment.
    May I humbly suggest you come up with a chart limited to the last 40 years? As that was not my attempt, maybe it can be yours.
    Please share your chart with all of us here.

  • Options
    SurfinxHISurfinxHI Posts: 2,677 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 17, 2025 3:44PM

    I don't think that is a chart, per se, in the way I'd interprete the word. A list perhaps, or a table, but not a chart. :#

    But then again, I'm a visual guy.

    Dead people tell interesting tales.
  • Options
    WCCWCC Posts: 3,240 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @sanddollar said:

    @jonathanb said:

    @Coins3675 said:
    That is a good chart.

    That is a bad chart. There is no chance of finding almost everything listed on that chart. Or a negative chance, if you consider that it's more likely to find a counterfeit than a real example.

    Try generating a list limited to the last 40 years, excluding all of the proofs that won't be found in circulation anyway, and all of the marketing hype varieties (floating head?) that nobody will pay for.

    I will have to learn to live with your disappointment.
    May I humbly suggest you come up with a chart limited to the last 40 years? As that was not my attempt, maybe it can be yours.
    Please share your chart with all of us here.

    Is the intent of this thread to acquire coins at FV, buy it at the market price, or both?

    My interpretation is both.

  • Options
    CregCreg Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @WCC said:
    Is the intent of this thread to acquire coins at FV, buy it at the market price, or both?
    My interpretation is both.

    Between those options exist bulk acquisitions, collections, and trades. Free is good too.

  • Options
    VeepVeep Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭✭

    That’s a great list for a numismatist.

    In my experience of dealing with the public, a list, just like an internet search gets laypersons imaginations running wild and coin shop phones ringing off the hook with unfounded claims of rarities.

    "Let me tell ya Bud, you can buy junk anytime!"
  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,364 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 17, 2025 6:03PM

    .

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,364 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Veep said:
    That’s a great list for a numismatist.

    In my experience of dealing with the public, a list, just like an internet search gets laypersons imaginations running wild and coin shop phones ringing off the hook with unfounded claims of rarities.

    This. 99.9% of the public couldn't identify any of the DDO/DDR or the RPMs or the near/far AM.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,424 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What about the recent VDB-V variety?

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 16,652 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @SurfinxHI said:
    I don't think that is a chart, per se, in the way I'd interprete the word. A list perhaps, or a table, but not a chart. :#

    But then again, I'm a visual guy.

    So am I and maybe AI is, too 😉

    AI: “A chart uses visuals like graphs and diagrams to show data relationships and trends, while a list (or table) uses rows and columns to present precise, detailed data. Choose a chart for a quick overview and to highlight patterns, and a list for detailed analysis, specific figures, and when you need to see the exact values side-by-side.”

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    dipset512dipset512 Posts: 289 ✭✭✭✭

    I'd add:

    1988-D Rev of 89
    1970-S DDO
    1971 DDO

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,101 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:

    99.9% of the public couldn't identify any of the DDO/DDR or the RPMs or the near/far AM.

    99.9% of the public couldn't tell you what DDO, DDR or RPM means without doing an internet search.

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 41,364 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MasonG said:

    @jmlanzaf said:

    99.9% of the public couldn't identify any of the DDO/DDR or the RPMs or the near/far AM.

    99.9% of the public couldn't tell you what DDO, DDR or RPM means without doing an internet search.

    True. But even if they found out what it means, they still wouldn't recognize it on a coin.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MasonGMasonG Posts: 7,101 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Can't argue with that.

  • Options
    orevilleoreville Posts: 12,292 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @sanddollar said:
    What would you add or take away from this basic chart? Cents to look out for and to place aside.

    You left out the 1958 DDO cent. Also they should called the Doubled Die cents.

    A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file