Options
PCGS Trade Dollar Submissions
InfantryColonel
Posts: 27 ✭✭
Nine orders submitted since September consisting of twenty crossovers, four orders had PCGS mistakes covering seven coins.
Who can spot the Quality Assurance mistakes in these two coins returned yesterday?
Tagged:
0
Comments
Is that a small fiber near 3:00 in the 1874? Off-center text on the label? Left off “ chopmarked”?
The shape of the holder of the 1874 appears ”warped” at the bottom?
1874 doesnt mention chopmarks at all, and 1876 the coin is reversed
It's all about what the people want...
The line at Whitman to submit at PCGS has been quite long the entire show.
Unfortunately, given the unflagging demand for their services, I don't see PCGS having the desire to spend additional money on non-revenue producing services like QA.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
Obviously the problem is that they didn't send the coins to me
Otherwise, I don't know..?
Collector, occasional seller
Too distracted by the mighty scarce choppers!
Looks like they took some sort of tool and damaged the coins before slabbing them.
If no chops on the obverse side of the 1876, IMO they did you a favor
Image Source: https://www.pcgs.com/cert/53968269
Keep it as is - it’s showing the money side just like this one
What is the world coming to, @tradedollarnut posted a variety?!?
But I understand the sentiment
(My photo skills are worse than subpar so you'll have to take my word for it that the color is really nice.)
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
The 1874 doesnt show chopmarks and the 1876 coin is reversed in the holder.
Successful Transactions With: JWP, DBSTrader2, greencopper, bretsan, ajaan
Thank you @tradedollarnut
What do others think?
The 1874 needs to be fixed to the Chopmark series but should I keep the1876 as is backwards?