@masterwax2000 said:
glad this thread has gotten so much attention.
)
who's counting? someone with nothing better to do with their time?
Only because you are a somewhat rare breed of troll. Usually your style is best suited over on subreddits rather than a coin forum.
PCGS boards gets its fair share of trolls yet generally they are more amusing and entertaining. This thread is a one-note-joke and you the author of it.
@masterwax2000 said:
I am only reacting to the the vibe I am getting. Like some people are just here for the jokes. I'm not but they seem to keep coming.
@masterwax2000 said:
I am not necessarily saying my coin is that great but I see a lot that aren't great getting MS67 or MS67+ and it seems like not all of them deserve that grade along side the one's that are almost flawless.
There are nine PCGS graded MS67 coins and none in MS67+.
How many of those have you seen again?
@masterwax2000 said:
after my coin comes back and I share the results I will never post on here again. I don't feel welcome. actually I feel the opposite.
you must come here just to post stuff like that... glad you found a place you belong.
Stick around. You haven't seen his best stuff yet.
The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)
@masterwax2000 said:
after my coin comes back and I share the results I will never post on here again. I don't feel welcome. actually I feel the opposite.
you must come here just to post stuff like that... glad you found a place you belong.
Stick around. You haven't seen his best stuff yet.
@masterwax2000 said:
after my coin comes back and I share the results I will never post on here again. I don't feel welcome. actually I feel the opposite.
you must come here just to post stuff like that... glad you found a place you belong.
Stick around. You haven't seen his best stuff yet.
That's Harsche.
The copycat has spoken.
The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)
It's really not that difficult (only to find) they're wanting to pick up the coin and see no distractions. If that happens then they can take a closer look and determine if an even closer look is warranted, or not.
In the trueview the first thing I notice is 6 or 7 distractions in the obverse fields.
It has a semi PL obverse which isn't helping to hide the obverse distractions then the reverse is muted and not matching.
But the good new is, you were so close but so far away.
I recently hit a couple 67s (Not 63 D unfortunately) and these coins are far from perfect but at first glance no immediate distractions.
@masterwax2000 said:
Of course I don't agree with the Grade (MS66) ,especially when looking at their picture and comparing it to others . the only comments I would appreciate are what do you think the reason for the Grade being what it is ? What did it have that killed the grade? or What did it need? Thanks, Mike
It's a great coin. If it's 66 it's a high end 66.
It's probably the marks in the field in front of the bust and the roughness on the shoulder. I thought the bump for being a tough date might carry it to 67.
@Coinscratch said:
It's really not that difficult (only to find) they're wanting to pick up the coin and see no distractions. If that happens then they can take a closer look and determine if an even closer look is warranted, or not.
In the trueview the first thing I notice is 6 or 7 distractions in the obverse fields.
It has a semi PL obverse which isn't helping to hide the obverse distractions then the reverse is muted and not matching.
But the good new is, you were so close but so far away.
I recently hit a couple 67s (Not 63 D unfortunately) and these coins are far from perfect but at first glance no immediate distractions.
there are 167 MS67's in 1955D and 490 MS 67's in 1954 S . There are 9 MS67's in 1963 D .
@masterwax2000 said:
third joke on this thread and third one I don't get. Explain and then if necessary I will elaborate of why I put my searched pennies into CoinStar.
I went to put $375 into a Coinstar machine, but the grocery store manager went wild and told me that she needed all those cents so that she could open the normal checkout lanes (and not just the self check credit card lanes). I was good with that since those were all the junk cents and it saved me a lot of time. I had already sold 5 boxes of 2023-D on EBay for $120 a box and the rolls of 2025 cents for $10 a roll from a box of those. Seems crazy to me, but people seem to really want them and my bank did not want them back at face.
Comments
)
Only because you are a somewhat rare breed of troll. Usually your style is best suited over on subreddits rather than a coin forum.
PCGS boards gets its fair share of trolls yet generally they are more amusing and entertaining. This thread is a one-note-joke and you the author of it.
You didn't quote the entire AI definition. Here's part of the definition that was left out.
Spam and overload feeds: They flood comments or live feeds with repetitive or negative messages.
Deny facts: They intentionally post incorrect information or deny obvious facts to provoke others.
Also, if you want to expand on a post you just made you can edit it rather than making new posts.
I personally hope you get the grade you're looking for. It just seems that you were trying a little too hard to convince us the coin deserves it.
People here can give their opinions but you just need PCGS to agree with you.
There are nine PCGS graded MS67 coins and none in MS67+.
How many of those have you seen again?
Stick around. You haven't seen his best stuff yet.
The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)
That's Harsche.
The copycat has spoken.
The measure of intelligence is the ability to change.
Albert Einstein (14 March 1879--18 April 1955)
Thanks for posting the result. When there is a sizeable jump in value from one grade to the next, the grading standard is not taken lightly.
I see several spots on the reverse and at least one on the obverse. Do you not see those? Also muted luster on the reverse.
The values are what they are for a reason. It's VERY difficult to get a 67.
It was too harsche.
Good on you for coming back and posting the results. That takes gumption, especially after how this thread transpired.
Sorry about the result, better luck next time.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
It's really not that difficult (only to find) they're wanting to pick up the coin and see no distractions. If that happens then they can take a closer look and determine if an even closer look is warranted, or not.
In the trueview the first thing I notice is 6 or 7 distractions in the obverse fields.
It has a semi PL obverse which isn't helping to hide the obverse distractions then the reverse is muted and not matching.
But the good new is, you were so close but so far away.
I recently hit a couple 67s (Not 63 D unfortunately) and these coins are far from perfect but at first glance no immediate distractions.
It's a great coin. If it's 66 it's a high end 66.
It's probably the marks in the field in front of the bust and the roughness on the shoulder. I thought the bump for being a tough date might carry it to 67.
Nice result.
Keep grinding
Crack it and resubmit in a future order.
BST: KindaNewish (3/21/21), WQuarterFreddie (3/30/21), Meltdown (4/6/21), DBSTrader2 (5/5/21) AKA- unclemonkey on Blow Out
Thus the price difference.
From only these four photos you have two MS65 (one might squeak into a 66) coins not worth the cost to submit.
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
I went to put $375 into a Coinstar machine, but the grocery store manager went wild and told me that she needed all those cents so that she could open the normal checkout lanes (and not just the self check credit card lanes). I was good with that since those were all the junk cents and it saved me a lot of time. I had already sold 5 boxes of 2023-D on EBay for $120 a box and the rolls of 2025 cents for $10 a roll from a box of those. Seems crazy to me, but people seem to really want them and my bank did not want them back at face.