Home U.S. Coin Forum

1894 Morgan Value

Need help on value of this coin.


Tagged:

Comments

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks AT. Have it graded, then you'll know the value.

  • jgivigljgivigl Posts: 58 ✭✭

    It's up for auction.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 5, 2025 10:28AM

    Edited again: After reading the catalog description (copied below), I later viewed the images of what turned out to be a complete cent-through-dollar 1894 Proof set. And while I wouldn’t bid on it sight-unseen, I’m no longer concerned about the toning on the dollar.

    “United States Morgan 1-dollar coin dated 1894. Coin obverse exhibits toning with and extremely small scratch at chin. Reverse of coin exhibits rainbow toning. Coin grades Proof PR65.”

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • anablepanablep Posts: 5,171 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I personally would never purchase an uncertified proof Morgan based on those pictures alone.

    Always looking for attractive rim toned Morgan and Peace dollars in PCGS or (older) ANA/ANACS holders!

    "Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."


    ~Wayne
  • jgivigljgivigl Posts: 58 ✭✭

    Thanks, I agree.

  • Coins3675Coins3675 Posts: 830 ✭✭✭✭

    I would say AT and would question the Proof status.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Coins3675 said:
    I would say AT and would question the Proof status.

    I think it’s a Proof. And in the grade advertised/claimed, a circulation strike of that date would be far more valuable than a Proof.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Coins3675Coins3675 Posts: 830 ✭✭✭✭

    I guess you are right, but I would prefer grading.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Is there any way to view lots at that auction firm?

    Collector, occasional seller

  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with the proof designation and think the toning is natural (many other straight-graded proof Morgans exhibit similar toning, I believe from tissue paper storage).

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 5, 2025 10:52AM

    @hummingbird_coins said:
    I agree with the proof designation and think the toning is natural (many other straight-graded proof Morgans exhibit similar toning, I believe from tissue paper storage).

    Being impressed with your posts and assessments here and having viewed the images again, I think it’s quite possible that you’re correct about the toning,

    Edited to add: After having been made aware that the dollar is part of a cent-through-dollar1894 Proof set and viewing pictures of each coin, I’m no longer concerned about the toning on the dollar.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • jonathanbjonathanb Posts: 3,804 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @hummingbird_coins said:
    I agree with the proof designation and think the toning is natural (many other straight-graded proof Morgans exhibit similar toning, I believe from tissue paper storage).

    Being impressed with your posts and assessments here and having viewed the images again, I think it’s quite possible that you’re correct about the toning,

    The auction actually has a complete 6-piece 1894 proof set in sequential lots. That adds a lot of weight for me. I expect that all 6 pieces are original, although I would certainly never predict what a tpg would say.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jonathanb said:

    @MFeld said:

    @hummingbird_coins said:
    I agree with the proof designation and think the toning is natural (many other straight-graded proof Morgans exhibit similar toning, I believe from tissue paper storage).

    Being impressed with your posts and assessments here and having viewed the images again, I think it’s quite possible that you’re correct about the toning,

    The auction actually has a complete 6-piece 1894 proof set in sequential lots. That adds a lot of weight for me. I expect that all 6 pieces are original, although I would certainly never predict what a tpg would say.

    Thank you - I hadn't seen that. And if the toning on the other coins looks believable, it would add a lot of weight for me, too.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If you planned on bidding you may have just given yourself more competition.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,448 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Given the other coins, the toning doesn't really bother me. I also don't see red flags regarding the surfaces on and of the other coins, and while the photos are not very good, they don't seem deceptive. One bad picture can accidentally hide something, but that's far less likely with six in a row. Someone has a chance at scoring big on the group of coins -- or getting burned. Not much different from buying those "Pig-in-a-Poke Boxes" that are all the rage.

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jonathanb said:

    @MFeld said:

    @hummingbird_coins said:
    I agree with the proof designation and think the toning is natural (many other straight-graded proof Morgans exhibit similar toning, I believe from tissue paper storage).

    Being impressed with your posts and assessments here and having viewed the images again, I think it’s quite possible that you’re correct about the toning,

    The auction actually has a complete 6-piece 1894 proof set in sequential lots. That adds a lot of weight for me. I expect that all 6 pieces are original, although I would certainly never predict what a tpg would say.

    Weird that they didn't get them graded though. Seems like that would have added much more value.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Morgan White said:

    @jonathanb said:

    @MFeld said:

    @hummingbird_coins said:
    I agree with the proof designation and think the toning is natural (many other straight-graded proof Morgans exhibit similar toning, I believe from tissue paper storage).

    Being impressed with your posts and assessments here and having viewed the images again, I think it’s quite possible that you’re correct about the toning,

    The auction actually has a complete 6-piece 1894 proof set in sequential lots. That adds a lot of weight for me. I expect that all 6 pieces are original, although I would certainly never predict what a tpg would say.

    Weird that they didn't get them graded though. Seems like that would have added much more value.

    Grading might have added much more value. On the other hand, often, we see ungraded coins sell for more than they likely would, if graded. That can happen when bidders take shots at what the coins might grade and end up overpaying.
    For example, the dollar was listed as PR65. Maybe it would grade 65 or higher. But what if it would grade 64 or lower and bidders figure it at 65 money?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @messydesk said:
    Given the other coins, the toning doesn't really bother me. I also don't see red flags regarding the surfaces on and of the other coins, and while the photos are not very good, they don't seem deceptive. One bad picture can accidentally hide something, but that's far less likely with six in a row. Someone has a chance at scoring big on the group of coins -- or getting burned. Not much different from buying those "Pig-in-a-Poke Boxes" that are all the rage.

    Even if unintentionally so, like most images of proof coins, the ones in the sale could easily be hiding hairlines, which would lower perceived grades. That’s a risk to buyers - especially for ungraded coins - no matter who the seller is and no matter how good the coins might look.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Were all 6 in 1 auction or individual auctions? logged into site but not the most user friendly navigation.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coastaljerseyguy said:
    Were all 6 in 1 auction or individual auctions? logged into site but not the most user friendly navigation.

    Each coin in the set has a separate lot number.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • logger7logger7 Posts: 9,205 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 5, 2025 12:09PM

    Was the proof set certified and they did not like the result? I've heard sellers like this say that they'll get more for the coins raw as buyers are going to think they are better than they are.

  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That 25% buyer's fee might burn someone not paying attention.
    They look like nice enough coins though.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,012 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Let how it goes in auction determine value.

    Investor
  • ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Apparently its value is $25,000+25%, so $31,250. That's a lotta dough.
    https://bid.alderferauction.com/ui/auctions/149003/21877064

    Collector, occasional seller

  • 2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 913 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wow!
    Greysheet for 67 CAC is 12K
    You could own 2 for that price….

  • hummingbird_coinshummingbird_coins Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like people are paying through the nose to acquire "fresh" raw material in hopes of it grading highly.
    Another possibility here is that more than one collector desired a complete matched set, although if this is the case, I had no idea original sets carried so large a premium.

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 304 ✭✭✭

    It's a sexy coin.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,825 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I can sum it up in one word-
    Risky

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 15,350 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @hummingbird_coins said:
    Looks like people are paying through the nose to acquire "fresh" raw material in hopes of it grading highly.
    Another possibility here is that more than one collector desired a complete matched set, although if this is the case, I had no idea original sets carried so large a premium.

    Most original sets - even ones that are much more closely matched than this one - don’t carry anywhere close to that type of premium. And we don’t even know if the same bidder won any or all of the other coins in the set. Either way, they hammered at much more subdued prices, as follows:
    Cent $275
    Nickel $800
    Dime $850
    Quarter $1000
    Half $1000

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • thebeavthebeav Posts: 3,988 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That's a beautiful set.
    Thanks for chasing down the pictures !

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,012 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 7, 2025 6:47PM

    OP coin: MS60 AT

    For sure a no go for me.

    Investor

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file