Did this happen at the mint or afterwards?


I got this 1970S cent in change in 1970. It looked odd so I put it in a holder and just came across it again last night. Do you this this happened at the mint? If so, what happened? I didn't think it happened afterwards since it still has most of the mint luster.
Thanks
0
Comments
It's just a badly damaged cent. More qualified opinions have disagreed with me.
Llamas and alpacas are camels. They aren't like camels, or related. They are camels. When was anyone going to tell me this?! How long had Bill Nye been holding out on us?
I'm not to sure about that.
Disclaimer: I'm not a dealer, trader, grader, investor or professional numismatist. I'm just a hobbyist. (To protect me but mostly you! 🤣 )
The overall weakness both obverse and reverse coupled with a full rim tells me at least this is not PMD yet mint caused. Could be a grease filled die.
I'm still learning about what it takes for a die set-up as I am not sure a weakly struck coin would have full rims. I think so, just not sure.
Filled dies
Yes. Maybe grease filled dies, but I also think impact damage
All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.
Thanks, I'll put it back in the box with a note that it's maybe filled dies.
At least it's not parking lot finds.
if fw says filled dies, then it's filled dies
Check the weight.
Tom, I thought about that too, thinking it looked like a split planchet before striking,
But the full rims tell me it’s grease filled dies.
3.109 g
Thanks for posting the weight – that’s normal weight for a copper Lincoln cent.
A weak strike would not have full rims.
It is a grease filled die although unusual to see it on both sides.
Wrote this two days ago and forgot to send so sending it now even though late to the party.
My guess is grease filled dies too. I don't thick it is damage.