Home U.S. Coin Forum

Can Anyone date this off center struck Indian Head Cent

redraiderredraider Posts: 304 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited October 10, 2025 12:45PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I have my guess, but I would like to se if anyone else has a thought on this one.

Web link for slightly larger pics:
https://www.northeastcoin.com/popupcontainer.jsp?include=vi&itemKey=zi28_1000243813

Comments

  • pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 2,024 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How would we be able to date it? The date is completely cut off.

    Proud follower of Christ!

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 11,047 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @pcgsregistrycollector said:
    How would we be able to date it? The date is completely cut off.

  • yosclimberyosclimber Posts: 5,115 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1864-1886, based on the feather position relative to foot of A.

  • redraiderredraider Posts: 304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hint: I did not use the die crack to date this coin. But the way I see this, it can only be one date! With enough evidence, one might be able to convince PCGS to put a date on this holder.

  • Die clash?

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,963 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How about that feather above the L?

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Author "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," due out late 2025.
  • BLUEJAYWAYBLUEJAYWAY Posts: 10,437 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @redraider said:
    Ok....I think this is an 1864 No L.

    The hubs changed slightly when they changed the design from a no L to a w/L in 1864.

    There is a very minor difference on the headdress on the forehead. On the 1864 w/L and all coins dated afterwards, you can see it very slightly extend into the field. The 1864 no L variant has a flush headrest with the field. I have tried to circle the differences in the 2 attached pics:

    No L

    With L

    Some good detective work there.

    Successful transactions:Tookybandit. "Everyone is equal, some are more equal than others".
  • jesbrokenjesbroken Posts: 10,729 ✭✭✭✭✭

    1st thing I saw was die crack. I know that several IHC's in 60's, including 64, 66 and 69 are known for obverse die cracks, but w/o books wouldn't have tried a guess. No access to books till I return home on Sunday. Some great info here though that I did not know. Thanks for post.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • CopperindianCopperindian Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Nice detective work Jonathan! You sent me to my reference book - agree with your analysis!
    Ken

    “The thrill of the hunt never gets old”

    PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
    Copperindian

    Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
    Copperindian
    Nickelodeon

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 11,047 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cool thread. I learned something, thanks.

  • gumby1234gumby1234 Posts: 5,901 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So it could be an 1859- 1863 cent as well?

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • LakesammmanLakesammman Posts: 17,493 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks copper to me rather than CN - - good analysis!

    "My friends who see my collection sometimes ask what something costs. I tell them and they are in awe at my stupidity." (Baccaruda, 12/03).I find it hard to believe that he (Trump) rushed to some hotel to meet girls of loose morals, although ours are undoubtedly the best in the world. (Putin 1/17) Gone but not forgotten. IGWT, Speedy, Bear, BigE, HokieFore, John Burns, Russ, TahoeDale, Dahlonega, Astrorat, Stewart Blay, Oldhoopster, Broadstruck, Ricko, Big Moose, Cardinal.
  • redraiderredraider Posts: 304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @gumby1234 said:
    So it could be an 1859- 1863 cent as well?

    It could be….but it really looks bronze. CN Indian head cents are much thicker, pretty sure that would have been caught by PCGS.

    The hubs changed in 1864 when they went to the w/L variant, so anything before that (CN from 1859-1864 included) was the same hub that was used in the no/L bronze variety.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file