Truly amazing card! - sarcasm intended
smallstocks
Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭✭
REA Marketplace just listed this card with the following description "an incredible PSA GEM MINT 10 example of his 1968 Topps. It’s a flawless example of one of Mays’ most beloved cards".
Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
1
Comments
10 OC? Looks narrow/trimmed.
Yep look less than min size. I'm thinking its a fake or "reseal"
BTW no buyer protection from them. Purchasing that Mays is like pissing away $65000.
speaking of REA
https://bid.collectrea.com/marketplace/2506
Clearly the gum has ripped through the top left of the pack and it is NO longer an 8. So is REA lazy, ignorant, incompetent or malicious or some combination thereof. There is no additional choice!
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
Seldom see recently graded 10s…mostly early graded 10s.
But should it actually be an A or is it reseal
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
Not unusual to find an undersized card in a very old slab. Graded in the mid/late 90s would be my guess. The presentation of that card now would struggle to receive a PSA8 assuming it would measure up. Otherwise, no better than Authentic.
Did not realize it was like that last century. I was RAW only until Summer of 2000 my first sub IIRC was Jan 2001. I still think I deserved a 10 on my 93 SP Jeter
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
Card went on a diet.
It's the centering that totally kills me. And the description that this is a flawless example.
Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
Anyone paying even more than a 7-price for this card…is stupid!
You lose your credibility defending the 10-grade on this card…by saying “incredible “ and “flawless “ when describing the card.
I assume you mean this area here?
That said, I've noticed far worse examples and have also noticed these issues are rarely mentioned by any seller when listing PSA graded wax packs.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
I missed that one. I was referring to the one on top of pack near top left corner
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
I think that may just be the scan, not a tear.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
PSA CERT Pic shows a normal crease https://www.psacard.com/cert/95551387/psa :
REA Pic shows a color breaking tear has developed in same area
Perhaps not as egregious as my first post indicted but it appears the pack is now in lower grade than when PSA imaged it.
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
In a backwards kind of way, loose gum that rips the wrapper appeals to me. It tells me that the gum has not melted onto the top card causing significant damage to possibly multiple cards. It signifies a fresh pack. Now, that said, I'd much prefer that the gum play nice and only shift around in the center of the pack to avoid rips.
Just change the old adage to "buy the pack, not the holder".
Interesting thought! For those who rip Vintage that may very well be a selling point?
@UFFDAH - seeking your opinion on the Gum situation.
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
I think he makes an excellent point.
As someone who enjoys ripping vintage I'm much happier with some loose gum than not.
For packs, a pet peeve of mine is when a seller says, "well, it was a" [enter grade number here] "when it was put into the slab," when trying to convince me to buy. I mean, it probably was before the pack was squished in there, but my OCD can't handle looking at it.
and it was probably even higher grade than that when it first rolled of the Topps assembly line....
There is reason I consider Cards dealers and sellers a notch below those who own used Car lots.
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
As long as the holder is designed the way it presently is, wrapper tears from loose or broken gum will be an issue. I wish they would utilize a mylar wrap within the well of the holder to help immobilize the gum so when the pack is in transit, the petrified gum doesn't act as a razor blade. It's a frustrating issue for pack collectors along with packs that are crammed into wells that are not wide enough to properly accommodate the pack.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.
I store my wax slabs horizontally to avoid issue but it sucks that I can't display them vertically...except for packs where gum has fused with the cards.
Agree a mylar insert would probably help although needs to be tested to ensure no other issues are introduced.
It's the singer not the song - Peter Townshend (1972)
Not even a minute do I buy the whole buh buh buh I'm a man-child japery - Me 2025
PSA has utilized the mylar wrap on occasion but has not done so on a consistent basis.
Collecting 1970s Topps baseball wax, rack and cello packs, as well as PCGS graded Half Cents, Large Cents, Two Cent pieces and Three Cent Silver pieces.