Can anyone help me identify this 1867 shield nickel with rays?

The date is fully doubled but doesn’t look like the ones pictured in the pcgs price guide varieties nor ngc varieties they attribute. Could this be a new variety for a DDO? Appreciate the help.
0
Comments
There are MANY doubled dies on shield nickels.
See The Shield Five Cent Series: A Comprehensive Listing of Known Varieties. Edward L. Fletcher, Jr. 1994
See also https://www.pcgs.com/news/pcgs-expands-shield-nickel-variety-attribution?gid=6
they don't attribute every die variety
Maybe not, but the date is very prominently doubled.
Howard Spindel's @howards site lists 6 different RPDs for 1867 with rays (as of 10/7/2016).
They are numbered as S1-3000 to S1-3005 .
Unfortunately he does not have photos of them online.
3 of the 6 are shown on NGC Variety Plus.
So yours might be one of the other 3.
Even if we had photos of all 6 known RPDs, your photo is rather small for this purpose.
So it may be worth posting a larger photo of the date area if you can.
https://www.shieldnickels.net/snvarpop/SNVarPop.htm
Mission accomplished lol
In the early years of the Shield Nickel dies only lasted for about 15,000 strikes so there are many, many dies used. There are more varieties than what are listed in the 1994 Fletcher book.
With the larger photo, I am more easily seeing the doubling of lower parts of the date, shield and arrowheads.
Are there split tips on any of these places?
If not, it might be shelf doubling.
That was my thought (mechanical doubling), even with the original photos.
I see split tips in all sorts of places that would be appropriate on a legitimate doubled die. Nothing here concerns me.
Legitimate doubled die struck coins have metal levels at the same height.
These appear to be high/low-flat, more indicative of mechanical doubling. But maybe I’m missing something by only looking at images on my iPhone.
Possibly a RPD. Larger, clearer images would be nice.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
It is concerning because in this era, the date was added by hand after the die was hubbed. Similar doubling on the date and design would be more likely to be from the strike. Lacking better pictures, I also vote "mechanical doubling" here.
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor