As you must already know, other than by luck, Proof coins cant be graded accurately from images. Because nearlly all of them have varying degrees of hairlines that aren't apparent in pictures.
And what's the point of asking for guesses regarding what slab the coin was in? You might as well ask people to guess when it was last purchased and cracked out of the holder.
Edited to add: If, by chance, the point in soliciting guesses about the previous holder pertains to what holders might be likely to cause various types of toning, why not start a thread about that?
End of rant.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
@MFeld said:
As you must already know, other than by luck, Proof coins cant be graded accurately from images. Because nearlly all of them have varying degrees of hairlines that aren't apparent in pictures.
And what's the point of asking for guesses regarding what slab the coin was in? You might as well ask people to guess when it was last purchased and cracked out of the holder.
Edited to add: If, by chance, the point in soliciting guesses about the previous holder pertains to what holders might be likely to cause various types of toning, why not start a thread about that?
End of rant.
Just for fun, like he said at the very beginning of the post
@MFeld said:
As you must already know, other than by luck, Proof coins cant be graded accurately from images. Because nearlly all of them have varying degrees of hairlines that aren't apparent in pictures.
And what's the point of asking for guesses regarding what slab the coin was in? You might as well ask people to guess when it was last purchased and cracked out of the holder.
Edited to add: If, by chance, the point in soliciting guesses about the previous holder pertains to what holders might be likely to cause various types of toning, why not start a thread about that?
End of rant.
Just for fun, like he said at the very beginning of the post
Fair point
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I feel like this was the closest guess. It was allegedly removed from an old ANACS small holder and graded PF-65 with no sort of cameo designation.
This was really all for fun as I know the photos are pretty horrible. I feel like this Franklin was one of those examples that got lucky and took on some really nice toning from the non-inert holder label.
God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️
Comments
PR 67…I have seen that type of toning in the small white Anacs slabs and the NGC fatties ….I will guess it was cracked from a small white Anacs
PF 66 and an ACCUGRADE holder
https://www.coincommunity.com/forum/pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=102076
https://www.vamworld.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2220
https://boards.ngccoin.com/profile/61076-johnhenry9009/
https://www.mycollect.com/Jonhherny9009
As you must already know, other than by luck, Proof coins cant be graded accurately from images. Because nearlly all of them have varying degrees of hairlines that aren't apparent in pictures.
And what's the point of asking for guesses regarding what slab the coin was in? You might as well ask people to guess when it was last purchased and cracked out of the holder.
Edited to add: If, by chance, the point in soliciting guesses about the previous holder pertains to what holders might be likely to cause various types of toning, why not start a thread about that?
End of rant.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
PF66 in green label PCI
DPOTD-3
'Emancipate yourselves from mental slavery'
CU #3245 B.N.A. #428
Don
My guess: PF67 old ngc holder (not necessarily a fatty)
Why would anyone crack out a perfectly fine proof Franklin?
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled
PF66
Old white anacs holder
How about a couple of realistic, clear photos, since those are not.
Old ANACS, PR67
Collector, occasional seller
Just for fun, like he said at the very beginning of the post
Collector, occasional seller
Fair point
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
PCI PR67
Mine with similar toning was PCI PR67 and upgraded to PCGS SP68.
I feel like this was the closest guess. It was allegedly removed from an old ANACS small holder and graded PF-65 with no sort of cameo designation.
This was really all for fun as I know the photos are pretty horrible. I feel like this Franklin was one of those examples that got lucky and took on some really nice toning from the non-inert holder label.
On the web: http://www.earlyus.com
It looks like a PF66 that I sold several years ago in a PCGS rattler holder.
PF66 CAM
God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️
I do see a receding hairline.
Nice coin, it is hard to grade proofs from photos
The pictures aren’t that bad.