Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

With all the hubub about the 1804$....I got to thinking about Eliasberg..

GaCoinGuyGaCoinGuy Posts: 2,873 ✭✭✭✭

Was reading the article about the 1804 and Eliasberg owning one of them at some point and then chased a rabbit down a hole to an article about Eliasberg and his complete set. The article mentioned that some numismatists didn't consider his set fully complete due to the lack of a large number of varieties. Got me to thinking......

Do you think it would ever be possible to have an example of every coin made to include every variety ever found?

imageimage

Comments

  • Options
    CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 34,199 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No. Infinitely more competition nowadays for the rarities.

    Professional Numismatist, Retired. 55 year member ANA. Former ANA Senior Authenticator. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and ANA Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner of the PNG's 2026 Robert Friedberg Award for "The Enigmatic Lincoln Cents of 1922," Available now from Whitman or Amazon.
  • Options
    CAC_ManCAC_Man Posts: 24 ✭✭

    Collecting every variety would be nearly impossible, with some of them being 1/1s, and the person who owns it would never sell. I consider Eliasberg a complete collection personally, the only angle you would have on not calling it complete is that the proofs were interchanged with the business strike examples, unlike the D.L. Hansen Collection, which has significantly more coins than Eliasberg but is missing a few significant examples. Such as the 1822 $5 as well as the 1870-S $3, which Eliasberg owned both of.

    Wes Brush Cataloguer and Buyer for DLRC.

  • Options
    lermishlermish Posts: 5,047 ✭✭✭✭✭

    There isn't even a definitive list of all varieties ever. Major varieties and minor varieties? Based on whose research and opinion? It's a fool's errand.

    I think that by type is the only reasonable option to even consider (for what in and of itself is a very ambitious and unreasonable goal).

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • Options
    johnny9434johnny9434 Posts: 34,285 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A decent idea but no, I dont see it either for alot of the above reasons

  • Options
    redraiderredraider Posts: 370 ✭✭✭✭✭

    His accomplishment is hard enough to compete against at any level. I don’t think it would be possible to add varieties to a complete set.

  • Options
    qrtqrt Posts: 472 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Off main topic... but...

    This sure would have been a great exhibit to view :

  • Options
    SeattleSlammerSeattleSlammer Posts: 10,126 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You’d need the one and only legal 1933 Farouk $20. So that coin alone would stop everyone … except maybe the owner of the one and only legal 1933 Farouk $20.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,214 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 23, 2025 4:18AM

    @JCH22 said:

    Off main topic... but...

    This sure would have been a great exhibit to view :

    I fnd it interesting and surprising that the 1804 dollar was advertised as merely "the Stickney silver dollar" with no reference to the coin's date. I doubt that a lot of the public would know what that meant.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    thebeavthebeav Posts: 4,123 ✭✭✭✭✭

    He sure did have the stuff !

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,126 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Pittman had coins that Eliasberg didn't.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,214 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Pittman had coins that Eliasberg didn't.

    So what? Nearly everyone has had coins that Eliasberg didn’t. 😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    littlebearlittlebear Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JCH22 said:

    Off main topic... but...

    This sure would have been a great exhibit to view :

    It most certainly was! Spent the summer visiting the Philadelphia mint...........Practically lived there. LOL

    Autism Awareness: There is no limit to the good you can do, if you don't care who gets the credit.
  • Options
    seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 1,635 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @thebeav . Great picture. I'm just about speechless, Can't even imagine what all is in that picture. James

  • Options
    RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,642 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @JCH22 said:

    This sure would have been a great exhibit to view :

    I did see that exhibit at the Philadelphia Mint in 1976. Great exhibit, still remember several of the coins.

    As far as a complete variety set of every variety, I don't think that is possible even if you limit the set to just Lincoln cent varieties. For example, there are over 100 repunched mintmarks of some dates.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • Options
    qrtqrt Posts: 472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 23, 2026 12:39PM

    the

  • Options
    jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 43,126 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @jmlanzaf said:
    Pittman had coins that Eliasberg didn't.

    So what? Nearly everyone has had coins that Eliasberg didn’t. 😉

    Lol. US gold coins that weren't represented in the Eliasberg collection.

    Please also troll anyone who says Eliasberg had a "complete set of US coins" since he didn't have all the US coins or there.

    All comments reflect the opinion of the author, even when irrefutably accurate.

  • Options
    edwardjulioedwardjulio Posts: 1,304 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Eliasberg collecting journey was easy. He bought the Clapp collection en bloc.

    End Systemic Elitism - It Takes All of Us
    ANA LM, LSCC, EAC, FUN

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file