Home U.S. Coin Forum

1878-CC Morgan Dollar -- Worn die, or messed with?

ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

Would like some opinions on this 1878-CC Silver Dollar (see photos attached). The coin's surfaces appear "textured" or "pebbly", which looked somewhat like the surfaces may have been smoothed. In looking through some 78-CC Morgan Trueviews, some of the coins show some texture, especially on the neck, but not to this degree. So has this coin been "smoothed", or is it something else (late die state?)

Thanks in advance!


Comments

  • TypekatTypekat Posts: 552 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The parallel lines running diagonally on her face do not look ‘as struck,’ and suggest (to me) that the coin was cleaned at one time.

    30+ years coin shop experience (ret.) Coins, bullion, currency, scrap & interesting folks. Loved every minute!

  • ELVIS1ELVIS1 Posts: 234 ✭✭✭

    looks hammered to me. Nice coin

  • Morgan WhiteMorgan White Posts: 9,225 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks whizzed.

  • It could be a "baking soda special".

    James at EarlyUS.com

    On the web: http://www.earlyus.com
  • coastaljerseyguycoastaljerseyguy Posts: 1,596 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Hard to tell from photo, but luster looks off.

  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,829 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Connecticoin I’d tend to think of it as “Late Die State” worn die pebbly textured, and those parallel lines could be planchet “Roller Mark” striations.

    I’ve seen a combination of those characteristics on several 1878-CC Morgan Dollars.

    The coin looks MS-63 to 64 to me based on your posted images.


    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • ConnecticoinConnecticoin Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for the comments, hopefully others can weigh in.

  • Rc5280Rc5280 Posts: 617 ✭✭✭✭

    I agree on the minor planchet roller marks and the hammered part - great strike.
    The luster looks off but it may be the lighting & contrast instead?
    The pebbly texture isn't over the top, and I subjectively see it closer to a 66, really nice coin if all is legit.
    Below is a coin sold in 2018 at Heritage, an NGC 67, and similar to yours - both are a VAM 22 fyi...
    https://coins.ha.com/itm/morgan-dollars/silver-and-related-dollars/1878-cc-1-ms67-ngc/a/1271-4924.s?ic4=ListView-Thumbnail-071515

  • 2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 872 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld What say ye?
    Curious what your opinion might be.
    I would be cautious unless i was able to see the coin in hand, whizzed or tooled in my opinion.

  • MFeldMFeld Posts: 14,911 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @2windy2fish said:
    @MFeld What say ye?
    Curious what your opinion might be.
    I would be cautious unless i was able to see the coin in hand, whizzed or tooled in my opinion.

    I don’t have a firm opinion based on the image provided. Currently, I wouldn’t be surprised if the coin graded approximately MS66 or if it was labeled as cleaned. Additional obverse shots and some reverse pictures might help.
    What do you see that makes you think tooling is a possibility?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Morgan13Morgan13 Posts: 1,699 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 17, 2025 7:07AM

    You really should post more images. Looking at the obverse it looks okay to me but the reverse could reveal some issues or not.
    Either way thanks for posting the image for this discussion. That's what this forum is for.
    I had to edit my post. I noticed that whenever someone posts a coin and ask "does this coin have this problem" whatever it is I feel your setting yourself up for unnecessary scrutiny.
    Just a thought.

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7

  • seatedlib3991seatedlib3991 Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭✭✭

    It would have to be seen in hand and by an expert. I do know for some 19th Century issues rusted die splayed havoc. i do think it was more common with new Orleans coins though. James

  • StuartStuart Posts: 9,829 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited August 17, 2025 6:12AM

    @Connecticoin - The minor obverse die crack in your posted photo at 6:00 to 7:00, extending from under the “18” in the date, through and below the first 2 stars to the left of the date, would imply an intermediate to later die state to lend support of the later die state contributing to its apparent pebbly surface texture.


    Stuart

    Collect 18th & 19th Century US Type Coins, Silver Dollars, $20 Gold Double Eagles and World Crowns & Talers with High Eye Appeal

    "Luck is what happens when Preparation meets Opportunity"
  • 2windy2fish2windy2fish Posts: 872 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld Perhaps tooled was the incorrect term to use, the surface just doesn’t look correct in my opinion.

  • CCDollarCCDollar Posts: 758 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I posted my PCGS MS63. Typical baggy 63 cheek but it does show the same type of surface. As stated above '78CC's can be "frosty". Don't know...looks like a killer coin if original. Take care...CC

    Nickel Triumph...My Led Zepps

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file