Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

A Repeating 3-Day GTG Experiment - 1st Coin Completes 7-21 - REVEALED 67+ CAC

2»

Comments

  • Options
    erwindocerwindoc Posts: 5,457 ✭✭✭✭✭

    MS66

  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,241 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Going a bit out on a limb:
    MS68

  • Options
    JeffersonFrogJeffersonFrog Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67+

    If we were all the same, the world would be an incredibly boring place.

    Tommy

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks so much guys, we have almost 40 guesses on this coin so far!

    New question - would everyone prefer we keep each coin in this thread, so you'd have to scroll through the past guesses? Or would you prefer a new thread for each coin?

  • Options
    1madman1madman Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unc details spot removal

  • Options
    bammbammbammbamm Posts: 190 ✭✭✭✭

    MS65

  • Options
    braddickbraddick Posts: 25,241 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:
    Thanks so much guys, we have almost 40 guesses on this coin so far!

    New question - would everyone prefer we keep each coin in this thread, so you'd have to scroll through the past guesses? Or would you prefer a new thread for each coin?

    A new thread please for each coin.

  • Options
    logger7logger7 Posts: 9,986 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @FlyingAl said:

    @logger7 said:
    67 cac at least; a couple luster grazes etc.; not sure how many they'd permit for a 68.

    I'll count this as a 67+.

    As Mr. Feld said: MFeld Posts: 14,738 ✭✭✭✭✭July 18, 2025 7:42PM
    I'll guess MS67+ and if it weren't stickered by CAC I very well might have guessed MS68.
    Said another way, I'll be shocked it the coin grades less than 67.

    I'm the least qualified on this site on grading, though I'd agree with probably the most experienced person on this site.

  • Options
    RexfordRexford Posts: 1,369 ✭✭✭✭✭
  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Rexford said:
    I’ll add a + to my previous guess if I still can.

    I adjusted it in the data, thanks.

  • Options
    RedRocketRedRocket Posts: 1,989 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Before finalizing and posting my guess please crack this Morgan out and take detailed photos of the edge.
    (I need to count the number of reeds.)

  • Options
    stockdude_stockdude_ Posts: 555 ✭✭✭✭

    65+ Too much chatter on jawline to go 66

  • Options
    slider23slider23 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭✭

    66

  • Options
    Eldorado9Eldorado9 Posts: 2,853 ✭✭✭✭✭

    67

  • Options
    pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I think the coin would be a 68 upon closer examination. This coin from the California collection is at GC currently and it is graded MS-68 CAC.

    Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OnBendedKnee said:
    Before finalizing and posting my guess please crack this Morgan out and take detailed photos of the edge.
    (I need to count the number of reeds.)

    Absolutely not.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,393 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    He clearly missed the “CAC only” part of this experiment.

  • Options
    pcgsregistrycollectorpcgsregistrycollector Posts: 2,330 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    LOL

    @FlyingAl said:

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    He clearly missed the “CAC only” part of this experiment.

    LOL

    @FlyingAl said:

    @OnBendedKnee said:
    Before finalizing and posting my guess please crack this Morgan out and take detailed photos of the edge.
    (I need to count the number of reeds.)

    Absolutely not.

    LOL

    Proud follower of Christ! I love the USA! Land of the Bright and Beautiful! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • Options
    1madman1madman Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    Under Liberty’s chin in the field. That area appears to have been messed with.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    Under Liberty’s chin in the field. That area appears to have been messed with.

    I’ll go ahead and confirm that this is not correct.

    You’re free to guess again, with a straight grade. The coin is not a details example.

  • Options

    67+

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,393 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 20, 2025 7:23AM

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    Under Liberty’s chin in the field. That area appears to have been messed with.

    Those look like minor contact marks in a very large image. I can’t see any evidence of a tooling/spot removal there.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    1madman1madman Posts: 1,767 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    Under Liberty’s chin in the field. That area appears to have been messed with.

    Those look like minor contact marks in a very large image. I can’t see any evidence of a tooling/spot removal there.

    My thinking is with it being in the bright area from the cartwheel effect and is dark, it’s like someone took an eraser there and it toned/retoned dark.

    Strange to have a patch of scuffs scratches and darkness in one area, and nothing anywhere else on the coin.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld Posts: 17,393 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:

    @MFeld said:

    @1madman said:
    Unc details spot removal

    Where?

    Under Liberty’s chin in the field. That area appears to have been messed with.

    Those look like minor contact marks in a very large image. I can’t see any evidence of a tooling/spot removal there.

    My thinking is with it being in the bright area from the cartwheel effect and is dark, it’s like someone took an eraser there and it toned/retoned dark.

    Strange to have a patch of scuffs scratches and darkness in one area, and nothing anywhere else on the coin.

    There are also minor marks and what looks like a darker area on the chin. But my guess is that we’re seeing the effects of lighting. I appreciate you taking the time to explain.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    DrewUDrewU Posts: 208 ✭✭✭✭

    MS-67+

  • Options
    marcmoishmarcmoish Posts: 6,965 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm late, I would have said 67+, not higher with the so subtle, but graded 68/CAC must be striking in hand, nice thread.

  • Options
    FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @marcmoish said:
    I'm late, I would have said 67+, not higher with the so subtle, but graded 68/CAC must be striking in hand, nice thread.

    Not late at all, the reveal won't happen until either late tonight or tomorrow afternoon, depending on if guesses keep coming in today.

  • Options
    TrickleChargeTrickleCharge Posts: 566 ✭✭✭✭

    @winesteven said:
    Throwing a dart, I’ll say 67+.

    Steve

    I vote that winesteven's guess be thrown out! Just kidding, very nice coin Steve. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file