Options
How can a G06 Morgan have more details on it than a VG10 Morgan? LOL!!!!!
Steven59
Posts: 9,988 ✭✭✭✭✭
Ok, I can see maybe screwing up and being one grade apart but 2 grades apart when the lower graded Morgan seems to be in better condition than higher graded Morgan..........I do realize it's ANACS but still................. 
1
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I am not well versed in Morgans, but different dates from different mints may not always be the best to compare grades.
I wish the photos were clear and unaltered then perhaps I could LOL with you.
peacockcoins
Dont know enough about Morgans to really be able to explain this, but my first thoughts were the denticles are significantly better on the VG10 than the G6. As stated above, could be the result of different mints.
Wow, those look severely cleaned.
Rims are stronger on the 1894 0.
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/1852045/1894-O-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-ANACS-VG-10
https://www.greatcollections.com/Coin/1833671/1900-S-Morgan-Silver-Dollar-ANACS-G-06
Here are the GC photos
the 1894-O
and the 1900-S
Well there yo go @braddick - see the picture shots above in johnhenry's post. I had to edit them to show up better in a different forum.
If they were wouldn't ANACS have stated that?
my first thoughts were the denticles are significantly better on the VG10 than the G6.
Yes I agree, just trying to see if better struck denticles id a 2 point upward swing when everything else is worse.
1894-O > 1900-S
Coins do not look cleaned. "O" mint generally offers less central detail due to strike. They could have both gone VG-08, Nothing to get yer dander up. J.P.
>
Is this the first time you’ve compared two coins and the one you thought was inferior graded higher?
Whatever your answer, this isn’t nearly as unusual as your post indicates you must think.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Comparing just the GC pics tells a better story. A lot more meat on the 10 than the 6. Wing tips. The stalks around the I of Pluribus. Reverse wreath details, etc. the darker toning on the 10 makes the high points appear more worn, when it is really color contrast. The reverse denticles are a huge difference also. The only detail better on the 6 is the ear.
https://www.autismforums.com/media/albums/acrylic-colors-by-rocco.291/
S mint coins are normally better strucked than O mint coins
Those photos are severely altered--look at how smoothed the cheeks are, and the dates are messed up. It's a horrendous photoshop job.
First, I am amazed that those are straight graded. Second, I think it was just a matter of what mood the grader was in at that time.
Did you look at the GC photos that were posted later? Based on them, you should be amazed if the coins hadn’t been straight graded.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
Looks like the original 1894-O was fudged compared the the GC shot, SOMEONE SMEARED THE EAR AREA. Who would ever want to put ANACS in a bad light? By the way, I probably graded both of these
The reverse rim on the VG10 is completely intact while the GD6 is not.
ANACS got these correct.
peacockcoins
If you consider one a VG08+ and the other a VG08-, they aren't as different a it seems. It's not a 2 level difference? It's a half level difference.
First time I ever bought 2 of the same type of coins at the same time - so YES!
Nothing to get yer dander up. J.P.
No dander - just using my First Amendment rights.
Well there's editing to make the photo clearer, or better represent in hand look, but then there's manipulation. This is worse then celebrities losing a foot or the wall behind them being curved. Looks at the left side of the slab. Did you think you could fool folks.
FTFY- fixed that for you, since edits seem acceptable in your playbook.
Edited for grammar.
https://www.autismforums.com/media/albums/acrylic-colors-by-rocco.291/
No, you're not.
You are utilizing Collector's Universe's privately owned message board to voice your opinion. Your opinion which can be deleted, changed, or restricted based on the sole whim of the owner's and operators of this privately owned business enterprise.
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
Sorry, I missed those. The GC photos made the coin look different.
One of the most misunderstood rights...
The government will not prosecute but PCGS is free to delete the post and ANACS can sue
Speaking of which, how did you get out of jail so quickly? I was surprised to see you there in the first place...
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
You’ve never seen pictures of two coins of the same type and the lower grade example looked like it should grade higher than the higher graded one?
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
I think you overpaid.
God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️
I'll DM you
Never mind the photos, having the coins in hand you couldn't tell the 94-O was superior, and you made a negative wisecrack at ANACs grading which was unwarranted. Of course we're going to correct you. And why manipulate any photo of y our coins. I'm calling BS.
Once again - I did not realize I posted an edited picture - all I did was copy and pasted the pic from the other forum I posted it on (and on that forum nobody accused me of doing a damn thing nor did they act so juvenile) - there was no intentional effort to cause this uproar. Jesus Christ people - lighten up. Pretend I just got arrested for burning down a building while peacefully protesting and pay my bail!
Thank you - before I bid on any coins I will make sure I talk to you first for your opinion!
God comes first in everything I do. I’m dedicated to serving Him with my whole life. Coin collecting is just a hobby—but even in that, I seek to honor Him. ✝️
The OP's pictures are pretty bad then and make the coins look bad. GC's pics look better.
More like obnoxious.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
According to the PCGS coin grade this is a VG10
You should definitely know! Unless you're making money off of a person you always treat them them like crap.
I'm not sure why you are lashing out at everyone.
Looks pretty similar...
I would prefer your coin as a VG08, but it's a borderline 10. Probably wouldn't CAC at 10 FWIW.
It is NOT, however, lower grade than the 6 you posted due to the rims alone. That was your original observation.
Who's Everyone?
Sorry...
Why are you lashing out at 50% of the posters on this thread?
[Better? ] you did call us whiny little girls but maybe that was a compliment.
Joe, are you saying these 2 pics are "Similar" why yes, they are 2 pics of a Morgan Dollar
Here are another 2 pics that are similar - they are fish!
>
No, I'm saying that the degree of wear is similar... as you no doubt knew. And as several other posters have already opined. And we were all met with the same attitude.
As I said, I prefer it as an 8. But it is better than the 6.
Joseph, Joseph, Joseph, the degree is not similar. And I'm sorry you misconstrued attitude for truth!
OP has repeatedly shown himself to be sexist, thoughtless, and dishonest. Other than the entertainment value, who cares what he says?
chopmarkedtradedollars.com
I think you wanted to say "misconstrued truth for attitude".
Yes, we are all wrong and you were right. And you haven't lashed out at ANYONE...