Home U.S. Coin Forum

Busting coins out of a proof set

I recently purchased two proof sets with NO S coins in them. The NO S coins, a dime and a nickel in 70 and 71 sets, both appear to be really nice coins, although the remaining coins in the sets are hazy, spotted, and have marks on them. Do/will TPG services remove the NO S coins if I send them in for grading, and if they do is it possible to retain the sets…(or possibly do a conservation on the hazy coins and return the NO S coins back into the sets after grading)? Trying to figure out my options as I’d prefer to keep the NO S coins looking nice before haze/spotting gets to them. Thanks for any tips or advice on this matter.

Comments

  • JBKJBK Posts: 16,005 ✭✭✭✭✭

    How about some photos? 🧐

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭



    Nickel in the 71set…dime in the 70 set

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 34,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i rec opening yourself

    the top and bottom snap together. without much force at all, twist the lenses until one seam creeps up enough to pry with something not sharp, like a putty knife

    hold it carefully and don't stab yourself with the pry tool. since these are going to be trashed, twist the crap out of that pry tool around all edges. don't scratch the coins with the pry tool. steady firm hands without over use of force from the hands forcing that tool around

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @MsMorrisine said:
    i rec opening yourself

    the top and bottom snap together. without much force at all, twist the lenses until one seam creeps up enough to pry with something not sharp, like a putty knife

    hold it carefully and don't stab yourself with the pry tool. since these are going to be trashed, twist the crap out of that pry tool around all edges. don't scratch the coins with the pry tool. steady firm hands without over use of force from the hands forcing that tool around

    Would the TPG service do this? I’d hate to screw the main coins up….

  • MsMorrisineMsMorrisine Posts: 34,032 ✭✭✭✭✭

    i'm unsure. they do crack ogp mint capsules (they literally crack them)

    Current maintainer of Stone's Master List of Favorite Websites // My BST transactions
  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The other coins in the set aren't worth conserving unless they would get an extremely high grade, so as MsMorrisine mentioned, crack the set open yourself and send the No S coins in for grading. BTW, if you have haze on a modern proof coin, a brief soak in pure white ammonia will almost always remove the haze, but you might find scratches that you couldn't see under the haze.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @RichieURich said:
    The other coins in the set aren't worth conserving unless they would get an extremely high grade, so as MsMorrisine mentioned, crack the set open yourself and send the No S coins in for grading. BTW, if you have haze on a modern proof coin, a brief soak in pure white ammonia will almost always remove the haze, but you might find scratches that you couldn't see under the haze.

    Thanks! I have pure acetone…would that be better?

  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @safari_dude said:

    @RichieURich said:
    The other coins in the set aren't worth conserving unless they would get an extremely high grade, so as MsMorrisine mentioned, crack the set open yourself and send the No S coins in for grading. BTW, if you have haze on a modern proof coin, a brief soak in pure white ammonia will almost always remove the haze, but you might find scratches that you couldn't see under the haze.

    Thanks! I have pure acetone…would that be better?

    No, I've found ammonia removes haze better.

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • CoinHunter4CoinHunter4 Posts: 410 ✭✭✭✭

    Random question, do you buy these sets for normal proof set prices or did you pay a premiums for the no-S's?

    Young Numismatist. Over 20 successful transactions including happy BST transactions with @CoinHoarder, @Namvet69, @Bruce7789, @TeacherCollector, @JWP, @CuKevin, @CoinsExplorer, @greencopper, @PapiNE and @privatecoin

    "Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing" -Benjamin Franklin

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @CoinHunter4 said:
    Random question, do you buy these sets for normal proof set prices or did you pay a premiums for the no-S's?

    $2,000 for both sets. I WISH I was lucky enough to find them. 😉

  • RichieURichRichieURich Posts: 8,522 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I spoke to a long-time dealer who buys and sells a lot of proof sets. He said he has never found a No-S proof set!

    An authorized PCGS dealer, and a contributor to the Red Book.

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @RichieURich said:
    I spoke to a long-time dealer who buys and sells a lot of proof sets. He said he has never found a No-S proof set!

    I’ve looked at quite a few and never found one either….These were a little treat to myself….😉

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 2,641 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm not sure why none of the so-called experts have not yet pointed out the obvious, but it looks to me like someone took advantage of you. It would be HIGHLY unusual for all of the coins in each of two sets, other than the special rare ones, to have developed a haze while the rare ones are pristine.

    I therefore think there is a strong possibility your no-S proofs are polished uncirculated no-S uncircs. Did you buy them from a trusted source? Maybe have someone knowledgeable examine them in person before cracking them out, in case I am correct.

  • jmlanzafjmlanzaf Posts: 35,366 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @NJCoin said:
    I'm not sure why none of the so-called experts have not yet pointed out the obvious, but it looks to me like someone took advantage of you. It would be HIGHLY unusual for all of the coins in each of two sets, other than the special rare ones, to have developed a haze while the rare ones are pristine.

    I therefore think there is a strong possibility your no-S proofs are polished uncirculated no-S uncircs. Did you buy them from a trusted source? Maybe have someone knowledgeable examine them in person before cracking them out, in case I am correct.

    It's possible and it is a common scam. That was, in fact, the first thing I looked for when the pictures were posted. But the photos simply aren't good enough to decipher anything and I didn't want to crap on anyone's purchase without at least some evidence.

  • FlyingAlFlyingAl Posts: 3,559 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @NJCoin said:
    I'm not sure why none of the so-called experts have not yet pointed out the obvious, but it looks to me like someone took advantage of you. It would be HIGHLY unusual for all of the coins in each of two sets, other than the special rare ones, to have developed a haze while the rare ones are pristine.

    I therefore think there is a strong possibility your no-S proofs are polished uncirculated no-S uncircs. Did you buy them from a trusted source? Maybe have someone knowledgeable examine them in person before cracking them out, in case I am correct.

    Easy way to find out - post some closeups of the two coins in question.

    I personally use a knife to open Proof sets like this - put the blade between the two lenses and separate them. They shouldn’t snap and you should be able to reuse them after if you’re careful.

    Coin Photographer.

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,385 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The photo of the 1970 dime shows a coin that appears to be a proof.

    The photo of the 1971 nickel is of such poor quality that I have no idea if it is a proof coin or not.

  • NJCoinNJCoin Posts: 2,641 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited March 1, 2025 6:31PM

    @jmlanzaf said:

    @NJCoin said:
    I'm not sure why none of the so-called experts have not yet pointed out the obvious, but it looks to me like someone took advantage of you. It would be HIGHLY unusual for all of the coins in each of two sets, other than the special rare ones, to have developed a haze while the rare ones are pristine.

    I therefore think there is a strong possibility your no-S proofs are polished uncirculated no-S uncircs. Did you buy them from a trusted source? Maybe have someone knowledgeable examine them in person before cracking them out, in case I am correct.

    It's possible and it is a common scam. That was, in fact, the first thing I looked for when the pictures were posted. But the photos simply aren't good enough to decipher anything and I didn't want to crap on anyone's purchase without at least some evidence.

    Yeah. And I don't know enough to poop on anything. I was just saying that I was surprised no one even raised the possibility. Especially given the hazing of 100% of the ordinary coins and 0% of the special ones.

    People focused on removing the haze and on cracking out the coins, and no one even mentioned the possibility of a scam under the circumstances. Just surprised me.

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    I bought them from a coin dealer…..that has quite a few PCGS and NGC CAC coins. I looked many of them up and the certificate numbers match the true views as do the coins. I have several older proof sets that have haze on a few of the coins while some look pristine.

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭





  • IkesTIkesT Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The coins are clearly legit. Having differently-hazed coins within the same proof set is actually not that unusual.

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @IkesT said:
    The coins are clearly legit. Having differently-hazed coins within the same proof set is actually not that unusual.

    Thank you sir!

  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,385 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The 1970 dime has an obverse that looks Cameo. What does the reverse of the dime look like?

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    I’ll get a shot in the morning for you. Already down for the night….😉

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭
    edited March 4, 2025 4:45AM

    The reverse appears to have a little bit of white hazy film on the rim…..

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    The 1970 dime has an obverse that looks Cameo. What does the reverse of the dime look like?

  • Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 8,542 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I do bust outs USM PF Sets all the time / some for slab mill some sell raw in 2x2 in collector coin browse boxes.

    Coins & Currency
  • SanctionIISanctionII Posts: 12,385 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Your dime looks like it would possibly receive a Cameo designation, or maybe even a DCAM. Take a look at the Coin Facts listing for this coin.

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @SanctionII said:
    Your dime looks like it would possibly receive a Cameo designation, or maybe even a DCAM. Take a look at the Coin Facts listing for this coin.

    Thanks. I’ll most likely send the nickel and dime in soon. Appreciate your comments!

  • OnastoneOnastone Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Please post your results and keep us updated!! This story needs a conclusion...

  • safari_dudesafari_dude Posts: 114 ✭✭✭

    @Onastone said:
    Please post your results and keep us updated!! This story needs a conclusion...

    I most certainly will!

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,509 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Once I twisted a couple 1968-S proof sets. They cracked and I removed the half dollars I wanted. I did not notice until I got them back, that one of the halves developed a large and obvious hairline on the removal process. I have done it a few times with brown box IKES. I am not sure what I would do with a $1000 coin, maybe Dremel with cutting tool around outside edges?

    Your coins look like proof to me, polished circs do not get that deep of mirrors.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file