Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

ANACS coin conservation

The user and all related content has been deleted.

Comments

  • Options
    RampageRampage Posts: 9,663 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I've never used it, but would be interested in seeing your results. Can you post before and after pictures eventually?

  • Options
    TRTR Posts: 58 ✭✭✭

    Used it once. was okay on circ coins but unc coins came back kind of too bright and the natural luster subdued. Never used it after that even though I use ANACS a lot..

  • Options

    Who des the conservation at ANACS?

  • Options
    Clackamas1Clackamas1 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭✭✭

    What is wrong with your coin?

  • Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Options

    Acetone?

  • Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Options
    Cougar1978Cougar1978 Posts: 9,771 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Coins of mine if develop or hazy / I dip them. I would suggest you practice on some cheap ones… b4 going to all in.

    Investor
  • Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For distracting haze removal my go-to is MS70.
    Can you post some better pictures of the coin? From the ones you have posted it doesn't look like it has a chance at CAM.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • Options
    ChrisH821ChrisH821 Posts: 7,100 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Unfortunately one-sided cameos don't get designated, particularly if that one-side is the reverse.
    Regarding removing haze: Here is a before and after of a 1942 Proof WLH that was very hazy. I cracked it out of a PR65 holder(to be fair, it was an old holder) and it graded PR67 when submitted. The process used here was just a soak in MS70, followed by tap water, then spray with distilled water to avoid water spots. This method is not per their instructions but it avoids any physical contact (chance of abrasion) with the surface of the coin
    I wouldn't do this to a coin with attractive haze, this was not.

    Collector, occasional seller

  • Options
    PTVETTERPTVETTER Posts: 6,109 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have tried IGC conservation service with OK results!

    Pat Vetter,Mercury Dime registry set,1938 Proof set registry,Pat & BJ Coins:724-325-7211


  • Options
    Clackamas1Clackamas1 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 25, 2024 6:14PM

    @ChrisH821 said:
    Unfortunately one-sided cameos don't get designated, particularly if that one-side is the reverse.
    Regarding removing haze: Here is a before and after of a 1942 Proof WLH that was very hazy. I cracked it out of a PR65 holder(to be fair, it was an old holder) and it graded PR67 when submitted. The process used here was just a soak in MS70, followed by tap water, then spray with distilled water to avoid water spots. This method is not per their instructions but it avoids any physical contact (chance of abrasion) with the surface of the coin
    I wouldn't do this to a coin with attractive haze, this was not.

    I mix in a post MS70 acetone bath and then a acetone rinse with fresh acetone, then a water and pat dry on a towel. I have never used Ezest on a good coin, leave the metal alone is my guidance but I can imagine it could help some coins.

  • Options
    The user and all related content has been deleted.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file