Options
GTG: Barber Quarter
erwindoc
Posts: 5,420 ✭✭✭✭✭
Deeply toned. Thoughts on what our hosts would say??? No cheating either!
2
Comments
Can't really tell because toning obscures luster and hairlines. If the luster is there and no hairlines, could be a gem, but that toning can hide a lot.
I see a few nicks and hairlines but it appears ms, so I’ll guess 63.
Has to be seen in-hand.
I believe it to be uncirculated, but to what grade I have no idea from photo. Inhand, maybe. Not great at GTG of super toned coins. Good luck.
Jim
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln
Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
Really hard to grade from a photo. I'd say anywhere from AU58 to MS63, it looks MS.
Doug
63
God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.
I like the toning. I was able to expand the Great Photo - there’s a number of hairlines, especially in the right obv field & on the neck. Also a few on the rev. Think it’s a low MS coin 60-62.
“The thrill of the hunt never gets old”
PCGS Registry: Screaming Eagles
Copperindian
Copperindian II
Indy Eagles
Gold Rush
Retired sets: Soaring Eagles
Copperindian
Nickelodeon
Early Walkers
Successful transactions: redraider, winesteven, renomedphys, splitaces, oreville, ajaan, Cent1225, onlyroosies, justindan, blitzdude, DesertMoon, johnnyb, Heubschgold, SunshineRareCoins, ParadimeCoins, ndeagles, Southern_Knights, pcgsregistrycollector
I love original toning but I think that this one will be too dark in hand for most collectors, I'd guess MS 62
Commems and Early Type
55
63ish 😏
63
64
Some good guesses. In an old anacs soap bar holder graded MS60. Its one that will definitely need to be viewed in hand. I was hoping to get it in a 62 holder though. Does not look like it has much luster, but it could be quite subdued by the toning.
It is a better date and the difference between a AU58 and a MS60 is $40. Since 58s are more marketable, would it make sense to have it professional conserved?
I just saw this and noticed you already posted the grade. From the single set of images I already had guess anywhere from AU58 to MS62 with really only AU58, MS60 and MS62 being in play. The surfaces look dead or burnt to me.
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
I thought the same thing. If someone were to dip that coin I don't think the results would be very good. Not that I am suggesting that should be done it just that type of toning IMHO.
Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
JWP PROMETHIUS88
Would leave as is put cost code and retail code (for CPG MS60) on price sticker on back. Hopefully lots of room. Somebody, somewhere would want it to fill the slot.
It looks good for MS60. Some probably try submit get 62. If doing that put MS62 as minimum grade on subm form. If needed another coin on slab bus execute that play.