GTG: 1900-S Morgan Silver Dollar - PCGS

Options
Numismy
Numismy Posts: 6 ✭
in U.S. Coin Forum

Curious to see what you all think this Morgan Dollar graded at PCGS - grade to be revealed EOD!

Tagged:

Comments

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,998 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Can you get the full resolution TV? Tough to see this tiny picture.

    But based on this tiny pic, 67.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • gumby1234
    gumby1234 Posts: 5,901 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'll guess 68 going with the small image. Larger image would definitely help.

    Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM

  • Coinscratch
    Coinscratch Posts: 11,085 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65

  • Smudge
    Smudge Posts: 10,001 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66.

  • REALGATOR
    REALGATOR Posts: 2,705 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65

  • johnhenry9009
    johnhenry9009 Posts: 334 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I'll say 67

    https://www.coincommunity.com/forum/pop_profile.asp?mode=display&id=102076
    https://www.vamworld.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=2220
    https://boards.ngccoin.com/profile/61076-johnhenry9009/
    https://www.mycollect.com/Jonhherny9009

  • CRHer700
    CRHer700 Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    67, based on the fact that it is impossible to see any small abrasions in the tiny photo.

    God bless all who believe in him. Do unto others what you expect to be done to you. Dubbed a "Committee Secret Agent" by @mr1931S on 7/23/24. Founding member of CU Anti-Troll League since 9/24/24.

  • Soldi
    Soldi Posts: 2,177 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66+

  • Mr_Spud
    Mr_Spud Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Looks like a 67 to me

    Mr_Spud

  • World67
    World67 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    58

  • privatecoin
    privatecoin Posts: 3,853 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65+

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • Morgan13
    Morgan13 Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS66

    Student of numismatics and collector of Morgan dollars
    Successful BST transactions with: Namvet Justindan Mattniss RWW olah_in_MA
    Dantheman984 Toyz4geo SurfinxHI greencopper RWW bigjpst bretsan MWallace logger7 JWP BruceS bigjpst
    JWP PROMETHIUS88

  • hummingbird_coins
    hummingbird_coins Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    67

    Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
    Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled

  • PeakRarities
    PeakRarities Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66+, could see it as a 67 if it were an 81-s.

    Founder- Peak Rarities
    Website
    Instagram
    Facebook

  • marcmoish
    marcmoish Posts: 6,936 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    66

  • logger7
    logger7 Posts: 9,858 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Around gem; very hard to grade from glamour pics..

  • john_nyc1
    john_nyc1 Posts: 246 ✭✭✭
    Options

    64

    Casual collector: Morgans & Peace Dollars & 20th Century Type Set. Successful BST transactions with ProofCollection, Morgan13, CoinFinder, CoinHunter4, Bretsan.

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 5, 2024 4:57AM
    Options

    The pictures make the coin look at least MS66. However, they’re far from clear. So anyone who guesses “wrong” based on the pictures might very well end up being “right” based on what the coin actually looks like in hand and/or based on the grade assigned.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • ProofCollection
    ProofCollection Posts: 8,052 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Please do this:
    Go to https://images.pcgs.com/trueview/12345678 and replace 12346578 with your cert number, download the Max version and post it here. I can't render any grading decision based on a tiny picture. And on that note, it's amazing how many coin shops still use tiny photos to sell their coins.

  • DennisH
    DennisH Posts: 14,041 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Sure looks like a 67 in those photos.

    When in doubt, don't.
  • HighRelief
    HighRelief Posts: 3,728 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65

  • johnny9434
    johnny9434 Posts: 34,049 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    65+

  • Walkerfan
    Walkerfan Posts: 10,391 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    ‘Appears’ MS 66 but I’d like better pictures. Something tells me it’s an AU and/or a problem coin.

    Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍

    My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):

    https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/

  • jp84
    jp84 Posts: 224 ✭✭✭
    Options

    67

  • Cougar1978
    Cougar1978 Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 4, 2024 4:38PM
    Options

    It’s lackluster ugly. What horrible tarnish, etc.

    Likely AU / Unc details

    Irregardless, thumbs down.

    Investor
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @lermish said:

    @Cougar1978 said:
    It’s lackluster ugly. What horrible tarnish, etc.

    Likely AU / Unc details

    Irregardless, thumbs down.

    Really feeling your oats after your big win on the 02 Lib $5 thread, huh?

    In his defense, his guess could be right on the money. That is, if the coin looks nothing like the images. But what’s the point of guessing if you’re going to ignore the images provided?

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,863 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 4, 2024 5:50PM
    Options

    The pictures make it hard to assess, and True Views tend to not show luster well. That said, it does look to have diminished luster possibly from an old cleaning. I’ll call it UNC details. It may also be silently netgraded as low MS (e.g. MS62).

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 4, 2024 5:57PM
    Options

    @cameonut2011 said:
    The pictures make it hard to assess, and True Views tend to not show luster well. That said, it does look to have diminished luster possibly from an old cleaning. I’ll call it UNC details. It may also be silently netgraded as low MS (e.g. MS62).

    Unless we’re seeing cleaning - and I won’t discount the possibility - the luster looks more than adequate to me.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • ProofCollection
    ProofCollection Posts: 8,052 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @MFeld said:

    @lermish said:

    @Cougar1978 said:
    It’s lackluster ugly. What horrible tarnish, etc.

    Likely AU / Unc details

    Irregardless, thumbs down.

    Really feeling your oats after your big win on the 02 Lib $5 thread, huh?

    In his defense, his guess could be right on the money. That is, if the coin looks nothing like the images. But what’s the point of guessing if you’re going to ignore the images provided?

    No part of a "Guess the Grade" thread requires the guess to be educated.

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @ProofCollection said:

    @MFeld said:

    @lermish said:

    @Cougar1978 said:
    It’s lackluster ugly. What horrible tarnish, etc.

    Likely AU / Unc details

    Irregardless, thumbs down.

    Really feeling your oats after your big win on the 02 Lib $5 thread, huh?

    In his defense, his guess could be right on the money. That is, if the coin looks nothing like the images. But what’s the point of guessing if you’re going to ignore the images provided?

    No part of a "Guess the Grade" thread requires the guess to be educated.

    No argument there!😉

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Cougar1978
    Cougar1978 Posts: 10,067 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Amusing - My taste in coins is my own so if somebody don’t like that do I care / no lol.

    Investor
  • dcarr
    dcarr Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Cougar1978 said:
    It’s lackluster ugly. What horrible tarnish, etc.

    Likely AU / Unc details

    Irregardless, thumbs down.

    What "ugly" coins do you have for sale (cheap because they're ugly, right ?) ?

    Moonlight Mint
  • TennesseeDave
    TennesseeDave Posts: 4,916 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 5, 2024 4:05AM
    Options

    Uncirculated details/altered surfaces. Oh, and welcome to the forum.

    Trade $'s
  • Numismy
    Numismy Posts: 6 ✭
    edited July 5, 2024 8:51AM
    Options

    Hi all! Thank you for your guesses - the coin was graded once by PCGS after being discovered in an old collection; the correct grade is PCGS MS-66 (Cert: 47184730).

  • lermish
    lermish Posts: 4,998 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    This is not the appropriate place for advertisements.

    chopmarkedtradedollars.com

  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,131 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited July 5, 2024 6:52AM
    Options

    @lermish said:
    This is not the appropriate place for advertisements.

    Here’s where you can post your offerings:

    https://forums.collectors.com/categories/buy-sell-trade-u-s-coins

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • World67
    World67 Posts: 13,098 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

  • cameonut2011
    cameonut2011 Posts: 10,863 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I’m glad I was off.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Comment As ...

Categories