GTG: 1902 Liberty Head $5 REVEALED
I'm curious what people think here. It's on it's way back from NGC and should be here in a few days.
I realize my images made it look flatter than it is. It has lots of luster, but they called it AU 58. I believe it warrants at least a t2 or 63 though!
Comments
-
63
Young Numismatist • My Toned Coins
Life is roadblocks. Don't let nothing stop you, 'cause we ain't stopping. - DJ Khaled1 -
-
61
1 -
62
0 -
63
Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc
1 -
63 maybe 64.
1 -
58
it's crackers to slip a rozzer the dropsy in snide
1 -
There’s a funky halo from the chin to the tip of the bust. UNC details?
0 -
65
1 -
62
1 -
61
Jb-rarities.com
IG: jb_rarities0 -
64 was my first thought.
"Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.
2 -
58
Investor0 -
It looks like an old Stack's photo which could explain the washed out cleaned details AU grade appearance, so who can really tell
1 -
The luster on the portrait seems to be somewhat lacking. That could be due to the photo lighting or cleaning.
Even though there are no large contact marks, I will guess MS61 or details cleaned.
Still a nice looking coin, regardless.0 -
58 or 62. It's hard to tell from the flat lighting in your pic.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire2 -
Either 58 or 62
Collector
Over 100 Positive BST transactions buying and selling with 57 members and counting!
instagram.com/klnumismatics0 -
61 CNGRTS!
The whole worlds off its rocker, buy Gold™.
BOOMIN!™
Wooooha! Did someone just say it's officially "TACO™" Tuesday????
Retiring at 55, what day is today?
0 -
I'll go with 62
Successful BST with ad4400, Kccoin, lablover, pointfivezero, koynekwest, jwitten, coin22lover, HalfDimeDude, erwindoc, jyzskowsi, COINS MAKE CENTS, AlanSki, BryceM
0 -
@Cougar1978 He said NGC not CACD.
3 -
0 -
Great guesses. My guess was at least 62 or 63 as I didn't see any wear on the coin in hand. And it is more lustrous than my images imply.
They graded it an au58.
5 -
@Shurke said:
There’s a funky halo from the chin to the tip of the bust. UNC details?I may have use the wrong light bulb for these pics. I have 2 sets and one set looks better than the other depending on the coin! (Fluorescent and led)
2 -
1
-
oh man, I rushed this one and completely whiffed it. Good job @Cougar1978, though you didn't need to "lol" everyone who guessed too high :'( .
1 -
In the reveal photo I can see 58. In the original pic I was hoping for a washed out photo and yes it was. Most all of the hits were washed out.
0 -
Definite candidate for no additional grading fees to be spent on it.
Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.
3
Leave a Comment
Categories
- All Categories
- 520.1K Coins and Currency - PCGS
- 328.5K U.S. Coin Forum
- 14.8K PCGS Set Registry Forum
- 5.2K Q & A Forum
- 41.4K World & Ancient Coins Forum
- 3K U.S. & World Currency Forum
- 96.4K Buy, Sell, & Trade - U.S. Coins
- 7.3K Buy, Sell & Trade - World & Ancient Coins
- 1.5K Buy, Sell & Trade - Currency
- 60 Random
- 246.2K Trading Cards, Autographs and Memorabilia - PSA
- 90.3K Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
- 1.7K Autographs Forum
- 16.4K PSA Set Registry Forum
- 22K Sports Talk
- 115K Buy, Sell & Trade - Cards & Memorabilia
- 663 Buy, Sell & Trade - Autographs
- 2.2K Stamps
- 1.5K Stamps Forum
- 670 Buy, Sell & Trade - Stamps
- 83 Coin Shows
- 83 General Coin Show Information and Discussion
- 11.9K Misc
- 11.9K Testing Forum