PCGS grade in

Options
Manorcourtman
Manorcourtman Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 9, 2022 12:44PM in U.S. Coin Forum

I should have my PCGS grade on this in a few days. What do you grade it? It has blazing luster FYI. Oh, and it's a DDO, FS-101 cherrypick. Not a dramatic doubled die, but tough nonetheless!! I'll give my opinion later.



1929 5C DDO FS-101 (016.8)
MS65
USA

Comments

  • clarkbar04
    clarkbar04 Posts: 5,027 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 27, 2022 10:41PM
    Options

    Above average strike for a 29, I’ll go with 65.

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • Connecticoin
    Connecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
  • MFeld
    MFeld Posts: 17,133 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    My guess is MS64, and if the coin has “blazing luster”, that’s not apparent in the images. The luster looks more satiny to me.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • PerryHall
    PerryHall Posts: 47,755 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    MS65. Nice coin.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • ricko
    ricko Posts: 98,724 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    That is a nice Buff... I would say MS64.... Nice details obverse and reverse. Cheers, RickO

  • ChrisH821
    ChrisH821 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I think 64

    Collector, occasional seller

  • 1Bufffan
    1Bufffan Posts: 675 ✭✭✭✭
    Options

    my guess would be ms62 or 63 just because of the nicks on the nose otherwise a very nice-looking coin, you should be very happy with whatever you get it's a keeper for sure.

  • LanceNewmanOCC
    LanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    64 odd lighting but decent images. :)

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Rondor
    Rondor Posts: 116 ✭✭✭
    Options

    I would say 64. Rev is easy 65 and Obv is 63.75 ( gotta be original in my breakdown)

  • Steven59
    Steven59 Posts: 11,232 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Using the supplied pictures I'd go 63. No blazing luster apparent - obverse will hold it down

    "When they can't find anything wrong with you, they create it!"

  • jesbroken
    jesbroken Posts: 11,252 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    I feel the lack of luster may or not hold it back. Photos don't always show luster and grader's don't have to rely on photos. If coin has luster not in photo then 65 and if not 64. Absolutely well struck 29.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • crazyhounddog
    crazyhounddog Posts: 14,250 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    If the the luster is there I see it as a 65. If not 64.
    As a footnote the images leave a lot to be desired. Looks like it was pounded with light. I agree the strike is above average for the date.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Manorcourtman
    Manorcourtman Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Thanks guys! I use my Wife's makeup light for my pics so that might explain my picture issue!!! I grade it 63. We'll see what our Host see's it as. I appreciate the brutal honesty!!!!!! I will post the results when they come in.

  • breakdown
    breakdown Posts: 2,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @crazyhounddog said:
    If the the luster is there I see it as a 65. If not 64.
    As a footnote the images leave a lot to be desired. Looks like it was pounded with light. I agree the strike is above average for the date.

    Joe’s post actually makes me feel better about the coin. My initial reaction based on the photos is that the coin may have been overdipped although the carbon spots would suggest otherwise.

    Good luck and please post the resulting grade.

    "Look up, old boy, and see what you get." -William Bonney.

  • BuffaloIronTail
    BuffaloIronTail Posts: 7,766 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Like Mark said, it's more satiny than brilliant. Too bad it has those black obverse spots. The coin's look overall is "clean", with a fully struck top feather.

    The reverse looks better than the obverse.

    It would be a 65 without the spotting so I'll say 64.

    Pete

    "I tell them there's no problems.....only solutions" - John Lennon
  • Manorcourtman
    Manorcourtman Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Just got word from our host:

    1929 5C DDO FS-101 (016.8)
    MS65
    USA

    Thanks for all the opinions!! I’m pretty happy about it! Happy 4th of July to everyone.

  • Connecticoin
    Connecticoin Posts: 13,278 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    Nice result, and you had it at 63! Luster likely fuller that photos indicate.

  • amwldcoin
    amwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options

    @Manorcourtman said:
    Just got word from our host:

    1929 5C DDO FS-101 (016.8)
    MS65
    USA

    Thanks for all the opinions!! I’m pretty happy about it! Happy 4th of July to everyone.

    Post the glamour shot when you get it!

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file