Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

How would you grade this Carson City Quarter?

I would greatly appreciate your grading opinions on this 1872 CC quarter.
Ex Stacks ca. 1990.

Thank you!

Comments

  • Options

    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

  • Options

    F-12. Possible cleaning?

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options

    F-12. Shield and feathers on reverse stop just short of F-15.
    Jim


    When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest....Abraham Lincoln

    Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.....Mark Twain
  • Options
    JimnightJimnight ✭✭✭✭✭

    I like it at 15.

  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with 15 also, but a light evidence of cleaning, that may or may not allow a problem free holder. Thats a 50/50. Cant see in hand, if it doesnt have wipe lines , would have a better chance of problem free holder.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld ✭✭✭✭✭

    @yosclimber said:
    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

    I don’t understand the reason for the “LOL” from Eddi for the above post. Maybe I’m missing something, but it strikes me as rude.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Flatwoods said:

    @MFeld said:

    @yosclimber said:
    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

    I don’t understand the reason for the “LOL” from Eddi for the above post. Maybe I’m missing something, but it strikes me as rude.

    Very easy to do accidentally while using your phone.

    Thank you. I hope that explains it.

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    rickoricko ✭✭✭✭✭

    I agree with F12... though at first I thought F15.... I tend to be more generous at these low grades - probably one of several reasons I would fail the qualification test for TPG grader.... :D;) Cheers, RickO

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2, 2021 12:48PM

    It’s very close to VF. It should bring VF money as that is a rare bird and very nice for an early CC quarter. The way those were struck a full liberty is sort of a VF thing. Normal quarter it’s a strong F

  • Options

    How would you grade this Carson City Quarter?

    I'd hold it by the rims between my thumb and pointer finger and rotate it slowly under a good light, evaluate the surfaces, amount of wear, any distracting marks, and repeat on the reverse. I would then consider each of these factors and assign an overall grade.

    :)

    I really have no idea how to grade these, but it was the answer that came to mind when reading the thread title.

  • Options
    EddiEddi ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Flatwoods said:

    @MFeld said:

    @yosclimber said:
    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

    I don’t understand the reason for the “LOL” from Eddi for the above post. Maybe I’m missing something, but it strikes me as rude.

    Very easy to do accidentally while using your phone.

    I'm very sorry - that was my mistake. Of course I did not intend 'LOL', bur rather a 'LIKE'.

  • Options
    PerryHallPerryHall ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 2, 2021 6:00AM

    @Flatwoods said:

    @MFeld said:

    @yosclimber said:
    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

    I don’t understand the reason for the “LOL” from Eddi for the above post. Maybe I’m missing something, but it strikes me as rude.

    Very easy to do accidentally while using your phone.

    You can remove it by clicking it a second time like an on-off switch. Most of you guys already know this but we get new members all of the time.
    We used to have a "Disagree" button but it was abused and removed by the moderators. Some here will use the "LOL" button as a "Disagree" button.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • Options
    EddiEddi ✭✭✭✭✭

    @MFeld said:

    @yosclimber said:
    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

    I don’t understand the reason for the “LOL” from Eddi for the above post. Maybe I’m missing something, but it strikes me as rude.

    It was a typing or rather, clicking mistake.

  • Options
    MFeldMFeld ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Eddi said:

    @MFeld said:

    @yosclimber said:
    F-15.
    It doesn't seem to have enough feather details to make VF-20.
    You can compare with other examples by looking at Auction Prices Realized, and click on the Grade column
    to sort by Grade.
    https://www.pcgs.com/auctionprices/details/1872-cc-ms/5482

    I don’t understand the reason for the “LOL” from Eddi for the above post. Maybe I’m missing something, but it strikes me as rude.

    It was a typing or rather, clicking mistake.

    Thank you.👍

    Mark Feld* of Heritage Auctions*Unless otherwise noted, my posts here represent my personal opinions.

  • Options
    291fifth291fifth ✭✭✭✭✭

    F-12, cleaned by burnishing.

    All glory is fleeting.
  • Options
    coinkatcoinkat ✭✭✭✭✭

    not a fan of the images... so based solely what I don't prefer, I am in the F12 camp

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • Options

    Im in the F 12 group also , and its been cleaned at one point in its circulation.

    "That's why I wander and follow La Vie Dansante"

  • Options
    keetskeets ✭✭✭✭✭

    F12.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge ✭✭✭✭✭

    12

  • Options
    Mr_SpudMr_Spud ✭✭✭✭✭

    I thought Fine12 also

    Mr_Spud

  • Options

    It has the surfaces of a VG, but then there’s a full “LIBERTY” so everyone is giving it a Fine. It’s also been cleaned. But since it’s a Carson City, it’s going to get the “CC push.”

    If it grades, despite the cleaning, it will go into a Fine holder.

    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    CryptoCrypto ✭✭✭✭✭

    I would like to see some of the LSCC guys chime in. The market doesn’t grade those like the S mint later date quarters. That is easily in the top half of survivors

  • Options
    rec78rec78 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Crypto said:
    I would like to see some of the LSCC guys chime in. The market doesn’t grade those like the S mint later date quarters. That is easily in the top half of survivors

    I'll go with VF20-25. That is an exceptional coin for a 1872-CC. The early CC's (1870-1874) were struck in almost pure silver and wore very quickly.

    image
  • Options

    I'd be shocked if that got a details grade, unless there are hairlines that the pics don't show. Looks like a nice circ to me, with a light bath sometime in the past and a lot of light used in the picture. Tough coin.

  • Options
    chesterbchesterb ✭✭✭✭✭

    My first reaction was F15 cleaned

  • Options
    fathomfathom ✭✭✭✭✭

    Fine. Cleaned rather heavily but what a great date in the series. Might get a CC rarity pass, hard to find that date unmolested.

  • Options

    F12 cleaned

    Investor
  • Options
    Joe_360Joe_360 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited April 4, 2021 11:36AM

    Well first I would get good fluoresce lights and strong magnification devices, maybe even a microscope. I would study the coin very closely on both side, and grade accordingly... :)

    I think this answers your question... Thanks for sharing!

  • Options

    F12

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • Options

    @scubafuel said:
    I'd be shocked if that got a details grade, unless there are hairlines that the pics don't show. Looks like a nice circ to me, with a light bath sometime in the past and a lot of light used in the picture. Tough coin.

    My first thought was Genuine Details. It looks like the grading consensus is Fine. Was at a coin shop the other day and there was A LOT of Genuine Details TPG graded coins in the display case.

  • Options
    CryptoCrypto ✭✭✭✭✭

    Go look at a fine 1891o and compare it to this one. Then look at a 76s. My only point being that a understanding of the series is required for grading that the basic redbook guide doesn’t get into. I would love to see a fine 72cc that is this nice

  • Options
    HydrantHydrant ✭✭✭✭✭

    F12. 15 would be a stretch.

  • Options

    OK someone explain to this numismanoob what about this piece points to a past cleaning so I learn something today ;)

    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • Options

    @lsica said:
    OK someone explain to this numismanoob what about this piece points to a past cleaning so I learn something today ;)

    That's a tough one isn't it. What looks like a cleaning, the dark dirtyness around the stars and other devices combined with the completely clean fields could just be normal wear and tear, rub.
    Feld?

  • Options

    15+/20 details, net 15 for cleaning.
    But it will straight grade.

  • Options

    @CoinscratchFever said:

    That's a tough one isn't it. What looks like a cleaning, the dark dirtyness around the stars and other devices combined with the completely clean fields could just be normal wear and tear, rub.
    Feld?

    Couldn't the "dirtyness" have been removed non-destructively with careful use of a soft toothpick and acetone?

    Philately will get you nowhere....
  • Options

    @lsica said:

    @CoinscratchFever said:

    That's a tough one isn't it. What looks like a cleaning, the dark dirtyness around the stars and other devices combined with the completely clean fields could just be normal wear and tear, rub.
    Feld?

    Couldn't the "dirtyness" have been removed non-destructively with careful use of a soft toothpick and acetone?

    It sure could have been, but it wasn't. Outside of that I believe there are looking for abrasive hair lines. And again couldn't those be caused by normal wear and tear?

  • Options

    I’d grade by my offer, $4750 if damage free.

    I’m thinking VF20.

    Sweet coin.

    Collecting since 1976.
  • Options
    AUandAGAUandAG ✭✭✭✭✭

    pocket smoothed, not cleaned that I can see.

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Options
    fathomfathom ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lsica said:

    @CoinscratchFever said:

    That's a tough one isn't it. What looks like a cleaning, the dark dirtyness around the stars and other devices combined with the completely clean fields could just be normal wear and tear, rub.
    Feld?

    Couldn't the "dirtyness" have been removed non-destructively with careful use of a soft toothpick and acetone?

    You will end up with bright spots. I would leave it alone. It's been wiped but not harshly. It could straight grade very easily, the date is tough to find "unprocessed".

  • Options

    F12.

    Cleaned, yes.

    Market acceptable, yes!

    Straight grade, most likely!!!

    Nice coin!

  • Options

    F-12 means "There will be a full 'LIBERTY' on the shield, but it will not be sharp."

    The "LIBERTY" on this coin looks pretty sharp to me.

    The problem with "survival of the fittest" is that it sounds totally awesome - so long as it is someone else's survival that is at stake

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file