Home› U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Do you tilt your coins when you image them?

coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited December 14, 2019 10:08AM in U.S. Coin Forum

I have heard it’s a no no but I feel it represents the coin/token better sometimes as it captures
Detail and even color sometimes. Not a big tilt, I use a piece of paper folded once.
Usually I take a pic tilted and flat and see which represents the coin better.
.
.
Soooooo, are you a coin tilter :) show us some raw images
.
.
These are raw images
.
.

.
.

Comments

  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    When shooting raw PL or toned yes but only slightly with an index card or two underneath.

    Too great of a tilt and the image sharpness will be soft on one side as it's becoming out of focus.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Almost always

    How is it a no-no?

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Broadstruck said:

    Too great of a tilt and the image sharpness will be soft on one side as it's becoming out of focus.

    There's a thing called depth of field and hyperfocal distance ;)

  • Options
    Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,424 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Tilting coins allows light to create slight shadows behind subtle raised details especially in weak or worn features. So there! Peace Roy

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    Too great of a tilt and the image sharpness will be soft on one side as it's becoming out of focus.

    There's a thing called depth of field and hyperfocal distance ;)

    Yeah depth of field... Never herd of the word hyperfocal before.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Almost always

    How is it a no-no?

    Do you tilt slabs too or just raw?

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2019 10:42AM

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    Too great of a tilt and the image sharpness will be soft on one side as it's becoming out of focus.

    There's a thing called depth of field and hyperfocal distance ;)

    Yeah depth of field... Never herd of the word hyperfocal before.

    Focus between the two points you want in focus

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Almost always

    How is it a no-no?

    Do you tilt slabs too or just raw?

    Absolutely, but dealing with glare can become problematic whicht can be taken care of by adjusting the height and angle of the lights.

  • Options
    BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:

    @Broadstruck said:

    Too great of a tilt and the image sharpness will be soft on one side as it's becoming out of focus.

    There's a thing called depth of field and hyperfocal distance ;)

    Yeah depth of field... Never herd of the word hyperfocal before.

    Focus between the two points you want in focus

    @Broadstruck said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Almost always

    How is it a no-no?

    Do you tilt slabs too or just raw?

    Absolutely, but dealing with glare can become problematic whicht can be taken care of by adjusting the height and angle of the lights.

    Also by tilting the camera mounting head on the stand to the same degree as the slab angle.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • Options
    bolivarshagnastybolivarshagnasty Posts: 7,359 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, I do this often.

  • Options
    crazyhounddogcrazyhounddog Posts: 14,253 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2019 11:10AM

    Sometimes, very rarely.

    The bitterness of "Poor Quality" is remembered long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten.
  • Options
    robecrobec Posts: 7,052 ✭✭✭✭✭

    99% of the time I leave flat.

  • Options
    FullHornFullHorn Posts: 1,168 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Coin on the same plane as camera and move the lights around

  • Options
    LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Almost always

    How is it a no-no?

    over-exposing a coin can lead to a fantasy look to some and i'm in that camp on a case-by-case. tons of trueviews are done this way. in numismotographer's defense, it is tough to get a middle-ground on a lot of coins. either don't over-expose and it may not show desirable details as stef pointed out and too much and we're chasing the rabbit. basically over-exposing can simply wash-out a coin's look, even when done professionally.

    so i stay on-point, great images caf and coin. :)
    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Options
    ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @LanceNewmanOCC said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    Almost always

    How is it a no-no?

    over-exposing a coin can lead to a fantasy look to some and i'm in that camp on a case-by-case. tons of trueviews are done this way. in numismotographer's defense, it is tough to get a middle-ground on a lot of coins. either don't over-expose and it may not show desirable details as stef pointed out and too much and we're chasing the rabbit. basically over-exposing can simply wash-out a coin's look, even when done professionally.

    so i stay on-point, great images caf and coin. :)
    .

    WTF are you talking about, Overexposure has nothing to do with tilting???

  • Options
    blu62vetteblu62vette Posts: 11,972 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I dont.

    http://www.bluccphotos.com" target="new">BluCC Photos Shows for onsite imaging: Nov Baltimore, FUN, Long Beach http://www.facebook.com/bluccphotos" target="new">BluCC on Facebook
  • Options
    WhitWhit Posts: 375 ✭✭✭

    Hello all; I have found that tilting the coin is unnecessary under an axial lighting setup. Below is an example , entirely unedited. BTW, the camera is just an ipad.

    Whit

    Whit
  • Options
    JimnightJimnight Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I haven't been .... but I think I'm going to give it a try.

  • Options
    SmudgeSmudge Posts: 10,003 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Stop down.

  • Options
    Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,953 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, but very slightly. All my coins are toned, and I think it renders a truer image of the coin.

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • Options
    OKCCOKCC Posts: 548 ✭✭✭

    @Whit said:
    Hello all; I have found that tilting the coin is unnecessary under an axial lighting setup. Below is an example , entirely unedited. BTW, the camera is just an ipad.

    Whit

    I don't understand this axial setup using a cardboard tube.
    I thought axial lighting was sideways light directed through a tilted pane of glass, and then shooting the picture through the tilted glass, or something like that.

  • Options
    bsshog40bsshog40 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I haven't taken many pics for quite a while now. I use to tilt a lot but I then I started using a diffuser to get rid of glare. Helped a lot.

  • Options
    TwobitcollectorTwobitcollector Posts: 4,774 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I lean mine against my coffee cup coaster, sometimes the coffee cup is in it. I just took this a moment ago

    Positive BST Transactions with:
    INYNWHWeTrust-TexasNationals,ajaan,blu62vette
    coinJP, Outhaul ,illini420,MICHAELDIXON, Fade to Black,epcjimi1,19Lyds,SNMAN,JerseyJoe, bigjpst, DMWJR , lordmarcovan, Weiss,Mfriday4962,UtahCoin,Downtown1974,pitboss,RichieURich,Bullsitter,JDsCoins,toyz4geo,jshaulis, mustanggt, SNMAN, MWallace, ms71, lordmarcovan,JWP,dantheman984,olah_in_MA,USMC_6115
  • Options
    GluggoGluggo Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2019 2:59PM

    I have a special platform I made that swivels different angles. These were shot on my swivel platform. It is actually a woman’s mirror from Walmart $10.00 special, for make up I unbolted and converted to a swivel base.
    I added these two side by side same coins!


  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @OKCC said:
    I don't understand this axial setup using a cardboard tube.
    I thought axial lighting was sideways light directed through a tilted pane of glass, and then shooting the picture through the tilted glass, or something like that.

    You are correct. This is axial lighting.
    Lance.

  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    No, I don't tilt coins. No need.

    When a coin is tilted in a slab and cannot be rapped back into place I will use a shim to get it square to the camera. Annoying but sometimes necessary.
    Lance.

  • Options
    GluggoGluggo Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ikeigwin what is the exact type of sheet clear glass to use? Would a picture frame glass work? I tried that once had a hard time getting results. I was thinking a special type of glass maybe. TYIA

  • Options
    AzurescensAzurescens Posts: 2,907 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2019 2:04PM

    Absolutely! If I'm selling a coin to someone, they're gonna see pictures that are overexposed (shows flaws, does nothing for luster and color etc), tilted in natural light and one of my bulbs. I try to mix it up a little so they have a better idea what it's gonna look like when they get it. I'd feel pretty bad giving one set of photos and it looks nothing like it in hand.

    There are just some shots that look like they're revealing the coin but they're actually just glamour shots and it's bad busines imo. I want someone to know the surfaces are clean and detailed even if the shot generally sucks. They're not gonna find an old staple gouge under a particularly dark area, for example, in certain types of pictures.

    I'm not saying it's bad business if you don't do exactly what I do (far from it), but glamour shots are just not for me. More returns and wasted time and the coin they bought only looks good to friends online for Internet points, but sucks to observe now and again.

  • Options
    FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,429 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Picture just taken.
    .

    .
    And my very Technical set up.
    .

    Ken

  • Options
    GluggoGluggo Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭✭✭

    A better side by side showing the different angles

  • Options
    WhitWhit Posts: 375 ✭✭✭

    @OKCC said:

    I don't understand this axial setup using a cardboard tube.
    I thought axial lighting was sideways light directed through a tilted pane of glass, and then shooting the picture through the tilted glass, or something like that.

    That is correct (as shown by Ikeigwin above). The tube ensures that the coin is being lit exclusively from above. Here is a site that discusses this:

    https://www.diyphotography.net/use-mirrors-get-perfect-axial-lighting-macro-subjects/

    Whit
  • Options
    bsshog40bsshog40 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 14, 2019 3:15PM

    I forgot to add that if I need to tilt, I made this some years back.
    https://youtu.be/BVfHfmdJVsg

  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,832 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'll do what it takes. Sometimes that means a slight tilt.

  • Options
    OKCCOKCC Posts: 548 ✭✭✭

    @Whit said:

    @OKCC said:

    I don't understand this axial setup using a cardboard tube.
    I thought axial lighting was sideways light directed through a tilted pane of glass, and then shooting the picture through the tilted glass, or something like that.

    That is correct (as shown by Ikeigwin above). The tube ensures that the coin is being lit exclusively from above. Here is a site that discusses this:

    https://www.diyphotography.net/use-mirrors-get-perfect-axial-lighting-macro-subjects/

    OK, I got it. The tube goes under the glass to block the sideways light. Thanks much for the link info.

  • Options
    lkeigwinlkeigwin Posts: 16,895 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Gluggo said:
    Ikeigwin what is the exact type of sheet clear glass to use? Would a picture frame glass work? I tried that once had a hard time getting results. I was thinking a special type of glass maybe. TYIA

    I don't know. I've used the same in my experiments. Picture frame glass. I've never gotten great results.

    FWIW, Phil has told me he has never used axial lighting.
    Lance.

  • Options
    GluggoGluggo Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thank you Ike!

  • Options
    emeraldATVemeraldATV Posts: 5,249 ✭✭✭✭✭

    "...TILT..."

  • Options
    messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,832 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @lkeigwin said:

    @Gluggo said:
    Ikeigwin what is the exact type of sheet clear glass to use? Would a picture frame glass work? I tried that once had a hard time getting results. I was thinking a special type of glass maybe. TYIA

    I don't know. I've used the same in my experiments. Picture frame glass. I've never gotten great results.

    FWIW, Phil has told me he has never used axial lighting.
    Lance.

    I never found it to be very useful, so it's not a technique I consider using.

  • Options
    Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, most of the time. Now if I can only figure out the "white" balance...LOL.

  • Options
    LanceNewmanOCCLanceNewmanOCC Posts: 19,999 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @coinsarefun said:
    I have heard it’s a no no but I feel it represents the coin/token better sometimes as it captures
    Detail and even color sometimes.

    was the no-no reason because of possible lack of focus at sides of the coin like someone mentioned in one of the first few posts or because of brightness issues?

    i was aiming at over-exposure/brightness/glare etc issues but that may not have been what you were thinking.
    .

    <--- look what's behind the mask! - cool link 1/NO ~ 2/NNP ~ 3/NNC ~ 4/CF ~ 5/PG ~ 6/Cert ~ 7/NGC 7a/NGC pop~ 8/NGCF ~ 9/HA archives ~ 10/PM ~ 11/NM ~ 12/ANACS cert ~ 13/ANACS pop - report fakes 1/ACEF ~ report fakes/thefts 1/NCIS - Numi-Classes SS ~ Bass ~ Transcribed Docs NNP - clashed coins - error training - V V mm styles -

  • Options
    coinsarefuncoinsarefun Posts: 21,781 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I thank everyone for your comments. As I said at the beginning of this thread, I do tilt once in a while when needed but
    very slightly.

  • Options
    DoubleEagle59DoubleEagle59 Posts: 8,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Quite often called the 'Ebay tilt', as the picture results in a more lusterous and colorful coin while hiding the surface imperfections.

    Great for selling.

    Not so good for buying.

    "Gold is money, and nothing else" (JP Morgan, 1912)

    "“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)

    "I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file