Home› U.S. Coin Forum

GTG 1892-O Barber Quarter GRADE REVEALED

ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,697 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited November 20, 2019 7:07AM in U.S. Coin Forum

Would like to hear what you all think about this one. Thanks in advance!

Comments

  • ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,697 ✭✭✭✭✭

    My photos:

  • DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,902 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I am going to throw down a 63 . . . just due to the action on the cheek. I like the coin . . . . and could see it higher, but the super reverse just can't counter the bit of stuff working on the cheek and right field . . .

    Nice coin . .

    Hate being first!

    Drunner

  • DRUNNERDRUNNER Posts: 3,902 ✭✭✭✭✭

    OK . . . . . . . 63+. You convinced me.

    Drunner

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

  • NicNic Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭✭✭

    pm sent as I love 3c silvers and live in FL

    My 1866 Philly Mint Set

  • KkathylKkathyl Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Ms 63 possible 64

    Best place to buy !
    Bronze Associate member

  • Dave99BDave99B Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Beauty. I’d go 64.

    Dave

    Always looking for original, better date VF20-VF35 Barber quarters and halves, and a quality beer.
  • amwldcoinamwldcoin Posts: 11,269 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58 maybe a +. Big difference luster wise between the different pictures.

  • jedmjedm Posts: 3,170 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November 19, 2019 8:38PM

    62 obverse with a 65 reverse.... tough one. I will stick with 62

  • 7Jaguars7Jaguars Posts: 7,764 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Yes, the cap and cheek, etc. on obverse limit my grade to a 62, and agree the reverse is very nice!

    Love that Milled British (1830-1960)
    Well, just Love coins, period.
  • HighReliefHighRelief Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

  • PokermandudePokermandude Posts: 2,713 ✭✭✭

    63

    http://stores.ebay.ca/Mattscoin - Canadian coins, World Coins, Silver, Gold, Coin lots, Modern Mint Products & Collections
  • TomBTomB Posts: 22,097 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reverse appears MS, but the obverse seems to have light rub. I will go with AU58+.

    Thomas Bush Numismatics & Numismatic Photography

    In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson

    image
  • cameonut2011cameonut2011 Posts: 10,181 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58

  • jughead1893jughead1893 Posts: 1,778 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

  • privatecoinprivatecoin Posts: 3,653 ✭✭✭✭✭

    64

    Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value. Zero. Voltaire. Ebay coinbowlllc

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    58+

  • morgandollar1878morgandollar1878 Posts: 4,006 ✭✭✭✭✭

    AU58, was going to call it 63, and then looked a little closer. Nice quarter.

    Instagram: nomad_numismatics
  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 4,982 ✭✭✭✭✭

    63

    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.
  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    gotta be a 63+

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The reverse is nice but the obverse looks a little worse. I would still call it a 63+

    Ken
  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,727 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks like an old school 58 based on the obverse, but probably in a modern 63 holder.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • PhilLynottPhilLynott Posts: 898 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Trueview has me at 63/64 your images 58. I’ll go with the middle number and guess 63 final answer.

  • ThreeCentSilverFLThreeCentSilverFL Posts: 1,697 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Thanks for guessing. Those that went with 58 were spot on! With the coin in hand, I'd imagine the light rub on the left and right obverse (circled in blue) resulted in the AU grade. It is pretty though :smiley:

  • Walkerguy21DWalkerguy21D Posts: 11,727 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Reminiscent of the "AU64" coins that forum member Broadstruck used to post years ago.
    He owned some of the nicest sliders around, and the GTG frequently had a lot of 63/64 guesses.

    Successful BST transactions with 171 members. Ebeneezer, Tonedeaf, Shane6596, Piano1, Ikenefic, RG, PCGSPhoto, stman, Don'tTelltheWife, Boosibri, Ron1968, snowequities, VTchaser, jrt103, SurfinxHI, 78saen, bp777, FHC, RYK, JTHawaii, Opportunity, Kliao, bigtime36, skanderbeg, split37, thebigeng, acloco, Toninginthblood, OKCC, braddick, Coinflip, robcool, fastfreddie, tightbudget, DBSTrader2, nickelsciolist, relaxn, Eagle eye, soldi, silverman68, ElKevvo, sawyerjosh, Schmitz7, talkingwalnut2, konsole, sharkman987, sniocsu, comma, jesbroken, David1234, biosolar, Sullykerry, Moldnut, erwindoc, MichaelDixon, GotTheBug
  • TreashuntTreashunt Posts: 6,747 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Man, they were tough on that one.

    Frank

    BHNC #203

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    That is one of those great 58’s. Seems like we just had a thread about this.

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    They were tough on it. I would have thought it would go higher because of the reverse.

    Ken
  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,831 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bearcave said:
    They were tough on it. I would have thought it would go higher because of the reverse.

    I see a bit of wear just above the ear, but thought they would let it “slide”.

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Smudge said:
    I see a bit of wear just above the ear, but thought they would let it “slide”.

    You were right on, 58 it is. I seen that but thought it would go higher because of the reverse.

    Ken
  • mr1931Smr1931S Posts: 6,420 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Choice uncirculated all day where I come from.

    Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.

  • mannie graymannie gray Posts: 7,259 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @bearcave said:

    @Smudge said:
    I see a bit of wear just above the ear, but thought they would let it “slide”.

    You were right on, 58 it is. I seen that but thought it would go higher because of the reverse.

    The reverse will very very rarely "carry" the coin.
    The reverse is seen as a possible detractor and not as a plus.
    One of the few exceptions would be a reverse Morgan toner which might get a bump from 62 to 63 if it has bag, textile, or crescent toning.
    But then the point is moot: the color will sell the coin and not the grade.

  • bearcavebearcave Posts: 3,996 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Good to know. I've been out to long.

    .> @mannie gray said:

    The reverse will very very rarely "carry" the coin.
    The reverse is seen as a possible detractor and not as a plus.
    One of the few exceptions would be a reverse Morgan toner which might get a bump from 62 to 63 if it has bag, textile, or crescent toning.
    But then the point is moot: the color will sell the coin and not the grade.

    Ken

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Format
SpoilerCodeQuote
Heading 2Heading 1
Emoji
:):D:(;):/:o:s:p:'(:|B):#:*<3o:)>:)
Url
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...