Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Calling Error Experts. What is the specific name for this strike thru error.

Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

This Morgan dollar has a void where something was between the planchet and the die. This is a fairly large defect. Nevertheless, it is not rare. What is interesting on this coin is the impressed outline of the denticals below the void. It appears that a piece of the struck rim from another coin fell onto the planchet.

What do you call this. What happened to cause it? THANKS!

Comments

  • Namvet69Namvet69 Posts: 9,246 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Feeder finger damage? Or a reeded edge strike from an object? Help me Obi wan, you are my only hope.

    BST: endeavor1967, synchr, kliao, Outhaul, Donttellthewife, U1Chicago, ajaan, mCarney1173, SurfinHi, MWallace, Sandman70gt, mustanggt, Pittstate03, Lazybones, Walkerguy21D, coinandcurrency242 , thebigeng, Collectorcoins, JimTyler, USMarine6, Elkevvo, Coll3ctor, Yorkshireman, CUKevin, ranshdow, CoinHunter4, bennybravo, Centsearcher, braddick, Windycity, ZoidMeister, mirabela, JJM, RichURich, Bullsitter, jmski52, LukeMarshall, coinsarefun, MichaelDixon, NickPatton, ProfLiz, Twobitcollector,Jesbroken oih82w8, DCW

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 18, 2019 5:06PM

    Struck Thru Press Operator Fart? ;)

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • TwoSides2aCoinTwoSides2aCoin Posts: 44,562 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks more like a clashed die than struck through.

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,929 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Wooden false teeth would leave that........yep.

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    You funny guys should be ashamed of yourselves. :(

    When I find out the correct answer, I'll post it and then we can make the jokes. :wink:

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Struck thru a feather?

  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Struck on a defective planchet.

    Delamination occured prior to striking.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Would like to see the full reverse.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • BroadstruckBroadstruck Posts: 30,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 18, 2019 8:02PM

    I see lamination striations so not a strike through.

    To Err Is Human.... To Collect Err's Is Just Too Much Darn Tootin Fun!
  • DNADaveDNADave Posts: 7,303 ✭✭✭✭✭

    May be similar to a dropped letter? Grease impacted into the collar falls out and gets struck into the coin.

  • davewesendavewesen Posts: 6,644 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I read that in the 1800's they used sawdust to clean dies - oil and rust - and some beginning strikes of the die still had some sawdust that was struck through until fell off. Do you see anything that looks like wood grain?

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The horizontal gray incuse patch could be anything, even a chunk of sawdust. It is not a lamination. The incuse beads are very unusual. I suspect part of a struck coin fell off after striking and got between the planchet and dies of the next strike.

    The reverse is normal.

  • CoinstartledCoinstartled Posts: 10,135 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Please post a pic of the whole coin.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 20, 2019 10:29AM

    Sorry, this is all that is needed for some error coin expert to educate selfish me as to what this is. If or as soon as one does, I'll post their opinion.

    I've already said that I believe a piece of the rim from a struck dollar broke off the side of a coin and was impressed into the next coin that was struck (denticles and a curved mark with original planchet surface). The horizontal unstruck area above the mark is where the dropped fragment prevented the dies from touching the planchet. That's the only answer I can think of to explain this. I know my limitations! I what to hear from the knowledgeable folks.

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 20, 2019 10:35AM

    If you are trying to say struck thru reeding, then I disagree which does not look like that IMO.

    Oh, perhaps you are saying stuck thru very thin peeled off lamination of the denticles, well I have never seen that so I couldn't tell you.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    If you are trying to say struck thru reeding, then I disagree which does not look like that IMO.

    That's what I'm thinking.

  • scubafuelscubafuel Posts: 1,937 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I had a friend in med school for pathology. The instructor should show them micro images of tissue and challenge them to figure out what was going on. They’d guess some rare disease and then he’d zoom out to show them it was actually a cross section from a Ballpark hotdog.
    Context is important.

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    If you are trying to say struck thru reeding, then I disagree which does not look like that IMO.

    That's what I'm thinking.

    See my update ...."Oh, perhaps you are saying stuck thru very thin peeled off lamination of the denticles, well I have never seen that so I couldn't tell you."

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DNADave said:
    May be similar to a dropped letter? Grease impacted into the collar falls out and gets struck into the coin.

    I thought of that, but the frosted texture of the indents implies something firmer. I can’t decide between a lamination peeled off the rim of a previously struck coin then getting struck into this coin, or a foreign object getting struck into a previous coin at the rim and then falling onto the reverse die.

    Bottom line, struck through a struck fragment of unknown origin.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • FredWeinbergFredWeinberg Posts: 5,923 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Viewing on my iPad and not on my larger computer screen – it looks like a lamination to me from that small area photo – a photo of the entire reverse would be helpful:

    Retired Collector & Dealer in Major Mint Error Coins & Currency since the 1960's.Co-Author of Whitman's "100 Greatest U.S. Mint Error Coins", and the Error Coin Encyclopedia, Vols., III & IV. Retired Authenticator for Major Mint Errors for PCGS. A 50+ Year PNG Member.A full-time numismatist since 1972, retired in 2022.
  • I definitely don't think this error is struck through a lamination at denticles. For denticles to be included in a lamination from another coin, they should curve in the opposite direction.

    It looks to me like this coin was struck through a lamination from the reverse of another Morgan Dollar, laminated half in the feathers and half in the flat field.

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    If you are trying to say struck thru reeding, then I disagree which does not look like that IMO.

    Oh, perhaps you are saying stuck thru very thin peeled off lamination of the denticles, well I have never seen that so I couldn't tell you.

    Thanks and yes. I've never seen anything like it before and cannot think of anything else it could be. As to thin...something had to cause the mark above the beads. Probably a chunk of the field attached to the denticals.

  • ctf_error_coinsctf_error_coins Posts: 15,433 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 20, 2019 6:38PM

    @Insider2 said:

    @ErrorsOnCoins said:
    If you are trying to say struck thru reeding, then I disagree which does not look like that IMO.

    Oh, perhaps you are saying stuck thru very thin peeled off lamination of the denticles, well I have never seen that so I couldn't tell you.

    Thanks and yes. I've never seen anything like it before and cannot think of anything else it could be. As to thin...something had to cause the mark above the beads. Probably a chunk of the field attached to the denticals.

    Does the strike thru pattern line up exactly with the denticles pattern?

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,700 ✭✭✭✭✭

    If we could SEE THE ENTIRE REVERSE we could compare the markings with the denticles!!!!

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • Aspie_RoccoAspie_Rocco Posts: 3,618 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Looks a lot like denticles on the lower portion.

  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Zipper Wing.

    thefinn
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 21, 2019 9:23AM

    If I had the ability, I'd superimpose the image of a rim on the the strike thru image.

    I'm really sorry to be such a __________________________, after all I'm the one who is asking for help; BUT IMHO, I have never understood the requests to see rims, reeding, edges, obverses, reverses, holders, entire coins, or whatever when ONLY a tiny part of a coin is involved. A clash mark, overstrike, striking errors, etc. may be some of the exceptions. I'll see if I can get the coin back.

    Anyway, thanks for the helpful posts. :)

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file