This is one I would like to see in hand to render my grade opinion.
Guessing 62 based on the images (chatter and slightly impaired luster), but could be 58 to 63.
MS63
My YouTube Channel
63
I grade it:
NICE!
Obverse looks like a 58 slider....reverse looks like a 63. Net 62?
I don't see luster breaks along Liberty's profile. 63
62.8
No decimals, ColonelJ.....that would make JA's job that much harder...
ICGFP
I Can't Grade From Pictures
edited to add: The head is almost nada Damage? Metal flow? Dramatic loss of localized frost after a dip?
I am considering echoing @RogerB at 45++
Might make AU --- but difficult to tell from photos.
I would’ve said 62.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
That's a nice one!
Comments
This is one I would like to see in hand to render my grade opinion.
Guessing 62 based on the images (chatter and slightly impaired luster), but could be 58 to 63.
MS63
My YouTube Channel
63
I grade it:
NICE!
BHNC #203
Obverse looks like a 58 slider....reverse looks like a 63. Net 62?
I don't see luster breaks along Liberty's profile.
63
62.8
No decimals, ColonelJ.....that would make JA's job that much harder...
ICGFP
I Can't Grade From Pictures
edited to add: The head is almost nada
Damage? Metal flow? Dramatic loss of localized frost after a dip?
I am considering echoing @RogerB at 45++
Might make AU --- but difficult to tell from photos.
I would’ve said 62.
Sometimes, it’s better to be LUCKY than good. 🍀 🍺👍
My Full Walker Registry Set (1916-1947):
https://www.ngccoin.com/registry/competitive-sets/16292/
That's a nice one!
My YouTube Channel