Home U.S. Coin Forum

What machine do you use to test gold and silver items?

I thought I saw a pic posted in one of the messages here which showed such a machine. Looking interesting

Comments

  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm backward. Specific Gravity and eye-ball. You gave me a good idea for a new discussion!

  • derrybderryb Posts: 37,498 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 5, 2018 7:45AM

    Sigma Precious Metals Verifier (PMV).

    Verifies known content. You tell it what you are trying to verify, it verifies the PM content. Reads through slabs. Happy with it.

  • AUandAGAUandAG Posts: 24,857 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Water, air, and a scale. (specific gravity)

    bob :)

    Registry: CC lowballs (boblindstrom), bobinvegas1989@yahoo.com
  • RogerBRogerB Posts: 8,852 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Interesting video. The stuff about pre-1945 and post-1945 US coinage alloy differences is bunk.

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Sigma Precious Metals Verifier (PMV).

    Verifies known content. You tell it what you are trying to verify, it verifies the PM content. Reads through slabs. Happy with it.

    That's what I use for 'known' items. :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,749 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Use sigma for bars, coins, etc.
    Have even found it to be helpful on flatware using sterling setting

    scrap jewelry and stuff , good ol fashion acid testing

    would like to have owned a xrf gun, but just couldn't stomach the cost , especially lately with low amount of scrap coming in, and also I am getting to where I just as well pass on scrap, most of it comes from questionable sources, and prefer to not even have those folks coming in any longer.

  • ashelandasheland Posts: 23,578 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Sigma usually, but like Insider says a lot of time in hand you can just tell.

  • messydeskmessydesk Posts: 20,191 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Why, a 3,000,000 lb. Southwark-Emery Universal Testing Machine, of course.

  • Wabbit2313Wabbit2313 Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭✭

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • PerryHallPerryHall Posts: 46,640 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Most of the time I use quality loupe, a good light source, my eyes, and my brain.

    Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
    "Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
    "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire

  • This thread is hilarious. How accurate do most of these machines say they are? I would really be interested to know how they work!

    A government accident left me a former man, a potato. That photo on my profile is a low resolution selfie. I like coins.

  • coinpro76coinpro76 Posts: 366 ✭✭✭

    Acid text and XRF Spectrometer

    all around collector of many fine things

  • oih82w8oih82w8 Posts: 12,481 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited September 5, 2018 11:36AM

    "I use a Hewlett-Packard model 5710a dual-column gas chromatograph with flame analyzing detectors."

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULATYrEpiJM

    oih82w8 = Oh I Hate To Wait _defectus patientia_aka...Dr. Defecto - Curator of RMO's

    BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
  • Insider2Insider2 Posts: 14,452 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BustyPotato said: "This thread is hilarious. How accurate do most of these machines say they are? I would really be interested to know how they work!"

    They are probably a lot more accurate than our eyes and hefting a bar in our hand to feel its weight.

    @coinpro76 said: "Acid text and XRF Spectrometer."

    I don't think any real "pros" test rare coins with acid.

  • SmudgeSmudge Posts: 9,720 ✭✭✭✭✭

    For rare coins I use the plastic test.

  • GluggoGluggo Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have a sigma pro for metal content. For thickness I use Epoch 600, Positector UTG, or 36DL.

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @BustyPotato This thread is hilarious. How accurate do most of these machines say they are? I would really be interested to know how they work!

    This little machine measures the resistivity of precious metals, each of which has a very different and distinguishable resistivity. This form of examination makes duplication nearly impossible, as the makeup of a gold with 90% purity and one with 91.67% would be distinctively read.

    Should an inauthentic piece of bullion be crafted in order to fool the scanner, the results would be clearly obvious to any observer- it would be impossible for something crafted in this manner to hold the same visual appeal of a true piece of bullion.

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    So, I guess the best answer is to use ALL of the 'tools' available to you, many of which are mentioned above :smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @Insider2 said:
    I'm backward. Specific Gravity and eye-ball. You gave me a good idea for a new discussion!

    I can't **weight **:smile:

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • CaptHenwayCaptHenway Posts: 32,564 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Specific gravity. Experience. Sometimes a ring test. On rare occasion with old, tarnished silver, smell.

    Numismatist. 50 year member ANA. Winner of four ANA Heath Literary Awards; three Wayte and Olga Raymond Literary Awards; Numismatist of the Year Award 2009, and Lifetime Achievement Award 2020. Winner numerous NLG Literary Awards.
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:
    Sigma Precious Metals Verifier (PMV).

    Verifies known content. You tell it what you are trying to verify, it verifies the PM content. Reads through slabs. Happy with it.

    Get a nice pure copper bar or round and put it on checking it under ".999 Fine Silver". It can't differentiate between very pure copper and silver. The manufacturer admitted to that, and that the Sigma PM Verifier is just one of many tests to use to verify metal and purity. My go to is specific gravity.

    thefinn
  • 1630Boston1630Boston Posts: 14,110 ✭✭✭✭✭

    The two biggest concerns with the original PMV are pure copper testing as silver, and copper (or silver) alloys testing as gold. I have yet to see a silver-plated copper fake, but theoretically this could be done and would fool the PMV by itself. And there are already counterfeit gold bars (mostly the fractional bars in plastic cards) that read as gold. By using the thickness measuring and dimension checking features of the PRO, you can indeed distinguish copper from silver and copper alloys from gold, even when the resistivity values are the same. And typically the two resistivity values you get with the PRO will differ enough on a plated item to raise suspicion (the values should be very close to the same for a pure solid piece of metal).

    https://youtu.be/E0De1GtrW2I

    Successful transactions with : MICHAELDIXON, Manorcourtman, Bochiman, bolivarshagnasty, AUandAG, onlyroosies, chumley, Weiss, jdimmick, BAJJERFAN, gene1978, TJM965, Smittys, GRANDAM, JTHawaii, mainejoe, softparade, derryb, Ricko

    Bad transactions with : nobody to date

  • coinpro76coinpro76 Posts: 366 ✭✭✭
    edited September 5, 2018 1:51PM

    @Insider2 said:
    @coinpro76 said: "Acid text and XRF Spectrometer."

    I don't think any real "pros" test rare coins with acid.

    The thread states "What machine do you use to test gold and silver items?"

    Not coins but Items good sir, any real "Pro" would know if a rare coin was authentic enough by handling (ie weight,appearance,) it to not have to subject it to a drill press and fire assay

    God forbid, if you ever have to test any gold items besides coins feel free to send them to the coinpro for authentication ;)

    all around collector of many fine things

  • derrybderryb Posts: 37,498 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @thefinn said:

    @derryb said:
    Sigma Precious Metals Verifier (PMV).

    Verifies known content. You tell it what you are trying to verify, it verifies the PM content. Reads through slabs. Happy with it.

    Get a nice pure copper bar or round and put it on checking it under ".999 Fine Silver". It can't differentiate between very pure copper and silver. The manufacturer admitted to that, and that the Sigma PM Verifier is just one of many tests to use to verify metal and purity. My go to is specific gravity.

    Your eyes should always be your first test. If they can't tell the difference between pure copper and fine silver, you have no business relying on the PMV.

  • GRANDAMGRANDAM Posts: 8,679 ✭✭✭✭✭

    I have been wanting one of these Sigma Precious Metal Verifiers ever since they came out.

    I have watched the prices come down a bit and I just pulled the trigger on one for $730 PLUS 10% eBay Buck of $73 so $657 net cost.

    Pretty good deal I think. Now I will have to check all my bullion and make sure I haven't got taken over the years.

    GrandAm :)
  • thefinnthefinn Posts: 2,657 ✭✭✭✭✭

    @derryb said:

    @thefinn said:

    @derryb said:
    Sigma Precious Metals Verifier (PMV).

    Verifies known content. You tell it what you are trying to verify, it verifies the PM content. Reads through slabs. Happy with it.

    Get a nice pure copper bar or round and put it on checking it under ".999 Fine Silver". It can't differentiate between very pure copper and silver. The manufacturer admitted to that, and that the Sigma PM Verifier is just one of many tests to use to verify metal and purity. My go to is specific gravity.

    Your eyes should always be your first test. If they can't tell the difference between pure copper and fine silver, you have no business relying on the PMV.

    What about silver-plated copper? Duh. I have used the Sigma PM Verifier before. Great instrument, but it does make mistakes, which is why I called them about the copper issue.
    That attitude you have that this one MACHINE will keep you safe will set you up for failure. Beware!

    thefinn

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file